Losonti Tokash wrote:Whoops sorry I picked the most publicized and egregious examples of police brutality that still resulted in no or pathetically lenient punishments. I like that we now have over half a dozen police murders and attempted murders on this page but you still think it's the poor cops being demonized. I personally know a man who had his mouth held open by police so they could spray a fire extinguisher into it but hey we don't know what was going on in their heads. They might not be qualified to safely use force but they can write a traffic ticket just fine which is why we give them a deadly weapon anyway.
Are you just too fucking stupid to understand why "rush to judgement" is a bad idea in general, or is this a specific blind spot for you?
You picked idiotic examples and didn't check them whatsoever:
A) You claimed the examples were from LA, which only one of them was in any specific way.
B) You complained about nothing happening to people who have been charged with murder, because the trial has not taken place yet.
C) You complained specifically about the punishment handed out by a jury in a case where the offender was on trial. What exactly are you asking of the state, star chambers? If so, why should these modified procedures only apply to police?
PS it shouldn't fucking take political pressure to get cops prosecuted for this shit which is even more evidence for how fucked police culture of protection is.
No shit. Did I say it should, or did I say that it does?
evilsoup wrote:t's not even limited to the police. All large organisations have the natural reaction to cover up fuck-ups. Though when the police fuck up, I guess it tends to be worse, since their job can involve committing violent acts.
Bakustra wrote:unnily enough, it is also quite possible for american police forces to be primarily composed of ordinary, average joes, with only a minute fraction actually committing murders and brutally assaulting people, and yet have the majority be complicit in such crimes.
This is where the point I'm trying to make comes from. It takes an extraordinary person to become a whistleblower or informer on their colleagues. It takes an unusual person to put aside all previous experience and knowledge and truly look at something - anything - and make any kind of determination against a member of a peer group, especially one as tight knit as a workplace. Neither of those are attributes of "average joes."
Is there a lot to do to change the culture of the police? Yes.
I think one of the best things that could be done is to finish the divorce of the "public order" aspects of police departments - the traffic cops, first responders, guards, for example - from the "investigative" aspects. Perhaps you could attach the investigators to the District Attorney's office (in the US system). Doing this would create better separation between the people investigating a crime and the groups where the abuses tend to occur. It wouldn't create a perfect system, but I do think it would be a step in the right direction in reducing the "circle the wagons" mentality that occurs whenever any organization has to investigate itself for any reason.
Ironically, this type of separation is routine in the United States for police, but the lines are drawn extremely inefficiently on geographic/organizational lines rather than functional ones. Take Los Angeles, for example. You have the LA Port Police, LA Airport Police, LA GSA Police, LAPD, LAUSD Police, and the LA Park Rangers, not to mention CHP, LA County Sheriffs, FBI, US Marshals, Secret Service, Customs and Border Patrol, Federal Reserve Police, US Forest Service Rangers, Federal Protective Service, Park Police, DEA, and ATF,
AMTRAK and Postal Police and probably a few I haven't thought of. If that's not a recipe for disfunction and confusion, I don't know what is.