videojuegos

Message

joviwan · #1176 Post by **joviwan** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:14 am

has anyone here played Strike Vector? It looks cheap and possibly fun but I don't want to buy a useless game.

Darksi4190 · #1177 Post by **Darksi4190** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 2:30 pm

"Multiplayer Only."

Not interested.

evilsoup · #1178 Post by **evilsoup** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:05 pm

ugh interacting with other humang beongs

Oxymoron · #1179 Post by **Oxymoron** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:00 pm

For me it would be more along the line of "ugh, lacking a reliable internet connection"

Gands · #1180 Post by **Gands** » Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:37 am

Forza 5 is good fun.

But you what the best thing is about this game? I can drive a 1963 Beetle, and a Love Bug paintjob is readily accessible. Best racing game ever.

Oxymoron · #1181 Post by **Oxymoron** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:44 am

the definition of ergonomics

Manus Dei · #1182 Post by **Manus Dei** » Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:38 pm

"Do you always look at it encoded?"
"Well, you have to. The image translators work for the construct program, but there's way too much information to decode Dwarf Fortress. You get used to it...I, I don't even see the code. All I see is...carp, undead elephant, skeletal whale, fortress flooded with lava..."

>:3 · #1183 Post by **>:3** » Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:25 pm

Manus Dei wrote:"Do you always look at it encoded?"
"Well, you have to. The image translators work for the construct program, but there's way too much information to decode Dwarf Fortress. You get used to it...I, I don't even see the code. All I see is...carp, undead elephant, skeletal whale, fortress flooded with lava..."

Oxymoron · #1184 Post by **Oxymoron** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:56 pm

Playing the new Wolfenstein game on PC.

When you get over the fact it's over 41GB in size and manage to actually install it, it's pretty fun to play.

The scenario and background are, as expected, really far out there, but this only make it funnier

I'll wait until I finished it, but so far that's a good old-school shooter in the vein of the new Shaeow Warrior (the tongue in cheek being far more subtle and less in your face - if you take the game at face value it could the impression of taking itself seriously).

Big Orangutan · #1185 Post by **Big Orangutan** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 1:06 pm

Yeah, there's a lot of good things said about that game, a surprise hit of 2014, with lots of Thanas trolling Nazi blasting action.

evilsoup · #1186 Post by **evilsoup** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 1:10 pm

over 41GB in size

what
really?

Kryten · #1187 Post by **Kryten** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:09 pm

evilsoup wrote:
over 41GB in size
what
really?

Just checked my steam copy; 45GB.

evilsoup · #1188 Post by **evilsoup** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:23 pm

what the fuck
how long did that take to download?

Oxymoron · #1189 Post by **Oxymoron** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:43 pm

Well, I specifically bought a physical copy. Which installed only 29GB of the 41GB of the game. Had to download the rest over two weeks, from the base's free wifi.

Kryten · #1190 Post by **Kryten** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:45 pm

About six hours? I'm just glad I wasn't at uni halls when I got it, or it would have easily taken over a day.

evilsoup · #1191 Post by **evilsoup** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:25 pm

jesus
oh well, I guess I'm just out of the loop when it comes to AAA games

Losonti Tokash · Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:43 pm

i remember years back when a game lost points in a pcgamer review because the install size was over 1gb

Oxymoron · #1193 Post by **Oxymoron** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:02 pm

At least the game's size justify itself with stunning visuals (if run at max settings) and interesting level design (visually, gameplay wise it's corridor-shooting with enough space left for allowing a number of different possible approaches in most situations).

Almost all levels feel unique (the ones in Berlin share similiraties, but that's normal).

Losonti Tokash · Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:05 pm

storage is also absurdly cheap nowadays so it's not like you regularly need to delete it to make room

joviwan · #1195 Post by **joviwan** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:24 pm

Titanfall is also absurdly huge, though in that game's case it's because of uncompressed audio. But yeah, triple-A games are now being made with bluray discs (read: consoles) in mind, so they have no qualms about filling that space up.

It's pretty rare for a game with any kind of marketting to come in at less than 10 gigs these days.

Darksi4190 · #1196 Post by **Darksi4190** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:26 pm

Sadly I think I need to pick up Wolfenstien for 360 as i'm not certain my Intel Core i5-3750K cpu is quite up to running modern games at high settings anymore.

joviwan · #1197 Post by **joviwan** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:29 pm

Your processor shouldn't even skip a beat. RAM and GPU are the more likely bottlenecks.

Darksi4190 · #1198 Post by **Darksi4190** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:31 pm

Ram i'm good on with 8 Gigs of DDR 3, GPU is an Nvidia GTX 660 Ti.

joviwan · #1199 Post by **joviwan** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 6:16 pm

That video card should play games just fine, too, as far as I can tell. If you get shitty framerates at Ultra settings, turn off v-synch and anything that says "occlusion" to get frames back.

#1200 Post by **RogueIce** » Mon Jul 07, 2014 10:23 pm

Losonti Tokash wrote:storage is also absurdly cheap nowadays so it's not like you regularly need to delete it to make room

I use a laptop.

New Testingstan

videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos

Re: videojuegos