Godammed SDN
Re: Godammed SDN
Get ur fill of sci-fi, science, and MOCKERY OF STUPID PEOPLE
Re: Godammed SDN
You'd think they'd wait until someone actually breaks the rules instead of just jumping on the first post they don't like and going "AHA!".RedImperator wrote:There's two components to "the affairs of other boards" rule. The first is (was) the ban on making threads to snipe at other boards, which honestly was mostly to keep the peace between SDN and SB in the early days of the board. While I don't think it's generally good or healthy for a majority of a board's traffic to be about other boards (he says, on Testingstan, in this thread), I don't think there's any reason "don't talk about other boards" should be a general principle, either. I don't see it as being much different from a thread that made fun of, say, Darkstar's website, or a dumb conservative's blog. If the target deserves it, then have at it--and HPCA definitely deserves it.
The second is part of a broader, longstanding policy that people shouldn't be punished on SDN for things they say and do elsehwere on the Internet, unless what they do elsewhere directly impacts SDN. Now, that doesn't mean you have to pretend that whatever they said elsewhere doesn't matter. You can use what they say elsewhere as evidence of intent, for example, which is what just happened with ADR. You can take issue with how ADR's statements here were used against him on SDN in this particular case, but there isn't and has never been some kind of blanket rule that you can't take someone's statement's elsewhere as evidence he or she intends to break the rules on SDN.
You can lump these two ideas together under the same broad category, but I don't think it's being inconsistent to say "You can make fun of other boards here, but we won't punish you for things you say elsewhere on the Internet". I don't see any logical reason why you can't have both policies. And as far as the first one goes, while I've said for a while (both here, in public on SDN, and in the mod forum) that I think the administration makes unnecessary trouble for itself by not communicating clearly, if a rule hasn't been enforced in years and isn't in the official board policies anymore (the AR, ID, and DR rule list), it's really not fair to call its continued nonenforcement "inconsistent".
Re: Godammed SDN
even mike hung shit on people for their HPCA hypocrisy
but now it's just a team of people two disinterested or busy to administer so...
but now it's just a team of people two disinterested or busy to administer so...
Re: Godammed SDN
adr wrote:Get ur fill of sci-fi, science, and MOCKERY OF STUPID PEOPLE
Re: Godammed SDN
Well Rob has a little guy so no wonder.
Re: Godammed SDN
my local policeman is really busy too
i'm happy he complains about it all the time as he selects crimes to prevent
i'm happy he complains about it all the time as he selects crimes to prevent
Re: Godammed SDN
Well dude, i think its time the intellectual crucible died.
Re: Godammed SDN
i told you forums don't die
well unless the owner gets cross and takes them down
they just become stagnant rather than vibrant, looking backwards instead of forward, obsessed with challenge instead of facing challenge, destroying instead of producing, etc
like life really
i guess we'd call it 'emo' :V
well unless the owner gets cross and takes them down
they just become stagnant rather than vibrant, looking backwards instead of forward, obsessed with challenge instead of facing challenge, destroying instead of producing, etc
like life really
i guess we'd call it 'emo' :V
Re: Godammed SDN
so is SDN gonna start combing its hair weird and doing the finger guns like Toby McGuire in Spiderman 3
Re: Godammed SDN
There was no Spiderman 3.VF5SS wrote:so is SDN gonna start combing its hair weird and doing the finger guns like Toby McGuire in Spiderman 3
Re: Godammed SDN
man connor had another change of mind with his bizarre obsession with 40k
brace yourself for another 50 threads
brace yourself for another 50 threads
Re: Godammed SDN
How am I suposed to reply to him without decending into a pointless nitpicking war when the guy demonstrates he doesn't understand wealth vs income?!adr wrote:What are you talking about, and what does this have to do with income distributionxon wrote:Ugh, I need to stop posting in that Income Inequality thread.
LOLOL
-
- Posts: 1456
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: Godammed SDN
i just don't engage, i have limited resources that could be better used on people who are receptive
Re: Godammed SDN
Play numbers: net assets vs annual income. It's a pretty flat line through the middle class.
Re: Godammed SDN
he ruined LoGH rightstarku wrote:man connor had another change of mind with his bizarre obsession with 40k
brace yourself for another 50 threads
Re: Godammed SDN
no that was vympel
Re: Godammed SDN
hatch disappears on ship turret
liquid metal hulls
liquid metal hulls
Re: Godammed SDN
logh just takes place in an area of space with a very high level of ambient light
OBVIOUSLY
OBVIOUSLY
- uraniun235
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:54 am
Re: Godammed SDN
i love that they have the same rear exhaust design as the big starshipsVF5SS wrote:the Spartanians are so cool
Re: Godammed SDN
hahaha i could probably post virtually anything and be accussed of trolling
amazing
amazing
Re: Godammed SDN
That would work.adr wrote:Play numbers: net assets vs annual income. It's a pretty flat line through the middle class.
I was also thinking of demonstrating that the gini index is naive as it uses "just" mean income with some bucketting and is very vulnerable to bucket sizing as well as outliers, but that requires understanding maths which might be a little hard for someone who appears to be having problems with the simple definition of income vs wealth.
But, it appears to be quite pointless.
That thread is horrible.adr wrote:hahaha i could probably post virtually anything and be accussed of trolling
amazing
Re: Godammed SDN
and now i'm contributing to it going even further downhill
stats aint my strong suit but there's no need to even get into that shit
stats aint my strong suit but there's no need to even get into that shit
Re: Godammed SDN
Yes, before hitting stats the debate needs to move past simple addition & subtraction.
I'm expecting my ref (http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html) to be called out for some stupid reason. It's actually remarkably hard to find historical wealth distribution info for the USA.
I'm expecting my ref (http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html) to be called out for some stupid reason. It's actually remarkably hard to find historical wealth distribution info for the USA.