Godammed SDN

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger.
Message
Author
adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3001 Post by adr-admin »

Get ur fill of sci-fi, science, and MOCKERY OF STUPID PEOPLE

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3002 Post by Zod »

RedImperator wrote:There's two components to "the affairs of other boards" rule. The first is (was) the ban on making threads to snipe at other boards, which honestly was mostly to keep the peace between SDN and SB in the early days of the board. While I don't think it's generally good or healthy for a majority of a board's traffic to be about other boards (he says, on Testingstan, in this thread), I don't think there's any reason "don't talk about other boards" should be a general principle, either. I don't see it as being much different from a thread that made fun of, say, Darkstar's website, or a dumb conservative's blog. If the target deserves it, then have at it--and HPCA definitely deserves it.

The second is part of a broader, longstanding policy that people shouldn't be punished on SDN for things they say and do elsehwere on the Internet, unless what they do elsewhere directly impacts SDN. Now, that doesn't mean you have to pretend that whatever they said elsewhere doesn't matter. You can use what they say elsewhere as evidence of intent, for example, which is what just happened with ADR. You can take issue with how ADR's statements here were used against him on SDN in this particular case, but there isn't and has never been some kind of blanket rule that you can't take someone's statement's elsewhere as evidence he or she intends to break the rules on SDN.

You can lump these two ideas together under the same broad category, but I don't think it's being inconsistent to say "You can make fun of other boards here, but we won't punish you for things you say elsewhere on the Internet". I don't see any logical reason why you can't have both policies. And as far as the first one goes, while I've said for a while (both here, in public on SDN, and in the mod forum) that I think the administration makes unnecessary trouble for itself by not communicating clearly, if a rule hasn't been enforced in years and isn't in the official board policies anymore (the AR, ID, and DR rule list), it's really not fair to call its continued nonenforcement "inconsistent".
You'd think they'd wait until someone actually breaks the rules instead of just jumping on the first post they don't like and going "AHA!".
Image

User avatar
starku
UNPROVOKED CYNICISM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3003 Post by starku »

even mike hung shit on people for their HPCA hypocrisy

but now it's just a team of people two disinterested or busy to administer so...

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3004 Post by Veef »

adr wrote:Get ur fill of sci-fi, science, and MOCKERY OF STUPID PEOPLE

Aaron
El Duderino
Posts: 2833
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:07 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3005 Post by Aaron »

Well Rob has a little guy so no wonder.

User avatar
starku
UNPROVOKED CYNICISM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3006 Post by starku »

my local policeman is really busy too

i'm happy he complains about it all the time as he selects crimes to prevent

:lol:

Aaron
El Duderino
Posts: 2833
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:07 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3007 Post by Aaron »

Well dude, i think its time the intellectual crucible died.

User avatar
starku
UNPROVOKED CYNICISM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3008 Post by starku »

i told you forums don't die

well unless the owner gets cross and takes them down

they just become stagnant rather than vibrant, looking backwards instead of forward, obsessed with challenge instead of facing challenge, destroying instead of producing, etc

like life really

i guess we'd call it 'emo' :V

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3009 Post by Veef »

so is SDN gonna start combing its hair weird and doing the finger guns like Toby McGuire in Spiderman 3

User avatar
Flagg
Posts: 2123
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:45 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3010 Post by Flagg »

VF5SS wrote:so is SDN gonna start combing its hair weird and doing the finger guns like Toby McGuire in Spiderman 3
There was no Spiderman 3.
CUNTS! FOR! EYES!
The Liberal Hate Machine

User avatar
starku
UNPROVOKED CYNICISM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3011 Post by starku »

man connor had another change of mind with his bizarre obsession with 40k
brace yourself for another 50 threads

xon
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:09 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3012 Post by xon »

adr wrote:
xon wrote:Ugh, I need to stop posting in that Income Inequality thread.
What are you talking about, and what does this have to do with income distribution


LOLOL
How am I suposed to reply to him without decending into a pointless nitpicking war when the guy demonstrates he doesn't understand wealth vs income?!

Losonti Tokash
Posts: 1456
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3013 Post by Losonti Tokash »

i just don't engage, i have limited resources that could be better used on people who are receptive

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3014 Post by adr-admin »

Play numbers: net assets vs annual income. It's a pretty flat line through the middle class.

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3015 Post by Veef »

starku wrote:man connor had another change of mind with his bizarre obsession with 40k
brace yourself for another 50 threads
he ruined LoGH right

User avatar
starku
UNPROVOKED CYNICISM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3016 Post by starku »

no that was vympel

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3017 Post by Veef »

hatch disappears on ship turret

liquid metal hulls

User avatar
Phantasee
I'mma let you finish
Posts: 1429
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:45 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3018 Post by Phantasee »

but mercury poisoning
My photographs: Instagram VSCO Grid

User avatar
starku
UNPROVOKED CYNICISM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3019 Post by starku »

logh just takes place in an area of space with a very high level of ambient light

OBVIOUSLY

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3020 Post by Veef »

the Spartanians are so cool

User avatar
uraniun235
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:54 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3021 Post by uraniun235 »

VF5SS wrote:the Spartanians are so cool
i love that they have the same rear exhaust design as the big starships

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3022 Post by adr-admin »

hahaha i could probably post virtually anything and be accussed of trolling

amazing

xon
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:09 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3023 Post by xon »

adr wrote:Play numbers: net assets vs annual income. It's a pretty flat line through the middle class.
That would work.

I was also thinking of demonstrating that the gini index is naive as it uses "just" mean income with some bucketting and is very vulnerable to bucket sizing as well as outliers, but that requires understanding maths which might be a little hard for someone who appears to be having problems with the simple definition of income vs wealth.

But, it appears to be quite pointless.
adr wrote:hahaha i could probably post virtually anything and be accussed of trolling

amazing
That thread is horrible.

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#3024 Post by adr-admin »

and now i'm contributing to it going even further downhill


stats aint my strong suit but there's no need to even get into that shit

xon
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:09 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#3025 Post by xon »

Yes, before hitting stats the debate needs to move past simple addition & subtraction.

I'm expecting my ref (http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html) to be called out for some stupid reason. It's actually remarkably hard to find historical wealth distribution info for the USA.

Locked