New Testingstan

adr wrote:i get sick of people failing to actually read what i say

You don't say anything.

§ 490.20 Making a terroristic threat.
1. A person is guilty of making a terroristic threat when with intent
to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a
unit of government by intimidation or coercion, or affect the conduct of
a unit of government by murder, assassination or kidnapping, he or she
threatens to commit or cause to be committed a specified offense and
thereby causes a reasonable expectation or fear of the imminent
commission of such offense.
2. It shall be no defense to a prosecution pursuant to this section
that the defendant did not have the intent or capability of committing
the specified offense or that the threat was not made to a person who
was a subject thereof.
Making a terroristic threat is a class D felony.

So how is it that the law can clearly state intent is not a defense, but people will still wring their hands over intent?

isn't throwing acid at women something all those countries full of brown people the US hates do

maybe we felt left out on that front

So has that guy that suggested that resigned yet? Or did they have the cajones to actually fire his ass?

Or are they rallying around him to protect him from the ebil librals?

F.J. Prefect, Esq wrote:

adr wrote:i get sick of people failing to actually read what i say

You don't say anything.

The backlash against adam is one of the fastest I've seen yet, remarkable.

Anyways, why was he banned from LA, posting an Iran state tv article?

Veef wrote:isn't throwing acid at women something all those countries full of brown people the US hates do

maybe we felt left out on that front

We cannot have an acid throwing gap!

ford turned against me months ago

i think destructionatorb is a pretty cool guy

its just that he has these silly notions mang

Oh he probably is a cool guy to hang out with, just like Choc, just don't talk politics.

i can sympathize with where he is coming from on his politics and my brain doesn't auto-lapse into hurr hurr you troll like those organisms at TEO tho

i don't think i am very cool to hang out with

i don't really.... do things

I think I'm a Rockefeller Republican (domestically). I'd say Red Tory but that's meant a lot of things over a lot of time in a lot of places, and I doubt Alberta's Red Tory of today means anything to anybody.

I think I used to be more left, but as it is Alberta (and Canada) aren't really right, either. I wonder how much of my political views have been shaped by being a member of the PCs for so many years without having clearly defined positions of my own on everything. Now I'm in a position where I can influence the party's policies and direction, and I don't really disagree with anything. I suppose that's partly from the party shifting left under the new leader. Used to be the reddest Tory in the room, and now I'm definitely not. Pretty sure the leader is more left than me.

It's kinda nice. But then I worry I'm getting set in my ways, ossifying, because I've found people that identify with a particular position or ideology tend to be blinkered to good ideas coming from other quarters.

adr wrote:i don't think i am very cool to hang out with

i don't really.... do things

fuck 'things'

Phantasee wrote:I think I'm a Rockefeller Republican (domestically). I'd say Red Tory but that's meant a lot of things over a lot of time in a lot of places, and I doubt Alberta's Red Tory of today means anything to anybody.

I think I used to be more left, but as it is Alberta (and Canada) aren't really right, either. I wonder how much of my political views have been shaped by being a member of the PCs for so many years without having clearly defined positions of my own on everything. Now I'm in a position where I can influence the party's policies and direction, and I don't really disagree with anything. I suppose that's partly from the party shifting left under the new leader. Used to be the reddest Tory in the room, and now I'm definitely not. Pretty sure the leader is more left than me.

It's kinda nice. But then I worry I'm getting set in my ways, ossifying, because I've found people that identify with a particular position or ideology tend to be blinkered to good ideas coming from other quarters.

I try and avoid labels, today my interests might be represented by the NDP, tomorrow the Libs or CPC. But I am a pretty concrete liberal.

i label myself an authoritarian conservative free market communist liberal anarchist

Shroom Man 777 wrote:i think destructionatorb is a pretty cool guy

its just that he has these silly notions mang

Eh trolls everyone and doesn't afraid of anythign.

Yeah, thats where he loses me, i actually agree with a lot of the pacifism stuff but I'm sick of trolls after 8 years of sdn.

OMFG eight years? I think I better get to the range this week.

adr wrote:i label myself an authoritarian conservative free market communist liberal anarchist

So on the Thomas Jefferson/George Washington end of the spectrum. Maybe on the GW putting down the Whiskey Rebellion end of the spectrum, but I may be reading you wrong. I most closely identify with Jeffersonian liberalism. Remember though, they both thougt that at times violence against enemies was necessary. Glad to see "pacifist" isn't in your label.

oh btw free market and communist can't coexist you try to hold both those beliefs at the same time in your head it'll 'splode like those guys in Scanners

Aaron wrote:Yeah, thats where he loses me, i actually agree with a lot of the pacifism stuff but I'm sick of trolls after 8 years of sdn.

OMFG eight years? I think I better get to the range this week.

yeah, i think adam totally has heart and picard lol

i need to familiarize myself with my P228 some more too

before long i'll just have to disengage from sdn b/c my patience needs to be refilled

i'm at the point now where like i come out assful on post #1

and then ppl expect ass so they come out assful too on post #2 and at this point most is already lost on both sides

then i see that as a justification for assfulness and crank it up for post #3



a while ago i used to try to be nice for post #1

and if it didn't work i'd assume i failed to communicate for post #2



but that takes patience and i haven't even been trying lately

go

The Spartan wrote:So has that guy that suggested that resigned yet? Or did they have the cajones to actually fire his ass?

Or are they rallying around him to protect him from the ebil librals?

as far as i know senator nan hayworth's offices have been incredibly silent and refuses to return phone calls

if i had to guess i'd say she's trying to figure out the best way to throw him under a bus and save her own ass

but no, nobody's been fired yet. i would say that's amazing but considering republicans today? meh

Shroom Man 777 wrote:

Aaron wrote:Yeah, thats where he loses me, i actually agree with a lot of the pacifism stuff but I'm sick of trolls after 8 years of sdn.

OMFG eight years? I think I better get to the range this week.

yeah, i think adam totally has heart and picard lol

i need to familiarize myself with my P228 some more too

That's a Sig?

Count Chocula wrote:Glad to see "pacifist" isn't in your label.

oh i forgot some sry

interventionalist pacifist religious atheist

synonomous antynoyma

literate dumbass

adr wrote:literate dumbass

This, unfortunately, is not an oxymoron.