Page 48 of 62

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:14 am
by joviwan
has anyone here played Strike Vector? It looks cheap and possibly fun but I don't want to buy a useless game.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 2:30 pm
by Darksi4190
"Multiplayer Only."


Not interested.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:05 pm
by evilsoup
ugh interacting with other humang beongs

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:00 pm
by Oxymoron
For me it would be more along the line of "ugh, lacking a reliable internet connection"

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:37 am
by Gands
Forza 5 is good fun.

But you what the best thing is about this game? I can drive a 1963 Beetle, and a Love Bug paintjob is readily accessible. Best racing game ever.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:44 am
by Oxymoron

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:38 pm
by Manus Dei
"Do you always look at it encoded?"
"Well, you have to. The image translators work for the construct program, but there's way too much information to decode Dwarf Fortress. You get used to it...I, I don't even see the code. All I see is...carp, undead elephant, skeletal whale, fortress flooded with lava..."

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 11:25 pm
by >:3
Manus Dei wrote:"Do you always look at it encoded?"
"Well, you have to. The image translators work for the construct program, but there's way too much information to decode Dwarf Fortress. You get used to it...I, I don't even see the code. All I see is...carp, undead elephant, skeletal whale, fortress flooded with lava..."
:brah:

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:56 pm
by Oxymoron
Playing the new Wolfenstein game on PC.

When you get over the fact it's over 41GB in size and manage to actually install it, it's pretty fun to play.

The scenario and background are, as expected, really far out there, but this only make it funnier
killing Nazies... ON THE MOON!
I'll wait until I finished it, but so far that's a good old-school shooter in the vein of the new Shaeow Warrior (the tongue in cheek being far more subtle and less in your face - if you take the game at face value it could the impression of taking itself seriously).

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 1:06 pm
by Big Orangutan
Yeah, there's a lot of good things said about that game, a surprise hit of 2014, with lots of Thanas trolling Nazi blasting action.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 1:10 pm
by evilsoup
over 41GB in size
what
really?

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:09 pm
by Kryten
evilsoup wrote:
over 41GB in size
what
really?
Just checked my steam copy; 45GB.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:23 pm
by evilsoup
what the fuck
how long did that take to download?

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:43 pm
by Oxymoron
Well, I specifically bought a physical copy. Which installed only 29GB of the 41GB of the game. Had to download the rest over two weeks, from the base's free wifi.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:45 pm
by Kryten
About six hours? I'm just glad I wasn't at uni halls when I got it, or it would have easily taken over a day.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:25 pm
by evilsoup
jesus
oh well, I guess I'm just out of the loop when it comes to AAA games

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 3:43 pm
by Losonti Tokash
i remember years back when a game lost points in a pcgamer review because the install size was over 1gb

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:02 pm
by Oxymoron
At least the game's size justify itself with stunning visuals (if run at max settings) and interesting level design (visually, gameplay wise it's corridor-shooting with enough space left for allowing a number of different possible approaches in most situations).

Almost all levels feel unique (the ones in Berlin share similiraties, but that's normal).

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:05 pm
by Losonti Tokash
storage is also absurdly cheap nowadays so it's not like you regularly need to delete it to make room

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:24 pm
by joviwan
Titanfall is also absurdly huge, though in that game's case it's because of uncompressed audio. But yeah, triple-A games are now being made with bluray discs (read: consoles) in mind, so they have no qualms about filling that space up.

It's pretty rare for a game with any kind of marketting to come in at less than 10 gigs these days.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:26 pm
by Darksi4190
Sadly I think I need to pick up Wolfenstien for 360 as i'm not certain my Intel Core i5-3750K cpu is quite up to running modern games at high settings anymore.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:29 pm
by joviwan
Your processor shouldn't even skip a beat. RAM and GPU are the more likely bottlenecks.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:31 pm
by Darksi4190
Ram i'm good on with 8 Gigs of DDR 3, GPU is an Nvidia GTX 660 Ti.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 6:16 pm
by joviwan
That video card should play games just fine, too, as far as I can tell. If you get shitty framerates at Ultra settings, turn off v-synch and anything that says "occlusion" to get frames back.

Re: videojuegos

Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 10:23 pm
by RogueIce
Losonti Tokash wrote:storage is also absurdly cheap nowadays so it's not like you regularly need to delete it to make room
I use a laptop. :failure: