New Testingstan

baks prolly

but it is quite delicious, he responds to someone calling him a tyrant...

...by engaging in tyranny

It's a fucking forum, you pussy. And it's private. So any claims of LOL TYRANNY have no merit.

Knubble tov wrote:It's a fucking forum, you pussy. And it's private. So any claims of LOL TYRANNY have no merit.

Who the fuck would Bakustra ask for help? NUA is the only one that actually understands him, he's speaking Greek to the rest of this forum.

And as it is, there's homogenous opinion on ethics over here, so it's not like we are all promoters of whatever it is Bakustra argued.

You're an idiot, Tucker.

Knubble tov wrote:It's a fucking forum, you pussy. And it's private. So any claims of LOL TYRANNY have no merit.

This is kind of funny, but they're not going to ban you again just because you post on this forum. Calm down.

*shrug* Arguing with Mike is a well known bannable offence.

The only question I have is whether I should have a memorial to him in my sig.

No, no Ford, they totally will. In fact, all of us who value our time over there should immediately deactivate our accounts.

F.J. Prefect, Esq wrote:

Knubble tov wrote:It's a fucking forum, you pussy. And it's private. So any claims of LOL TYRANNY have no merit.

This is kind of funny, but they're not going to ban you again just because you post on this forum. Calm down.

I know they aren't. I am just finding it funny that people who hate that place are complaining about getting banned and it's apparently tyranny.

Dude, there is a whole mock civility to the place when it comes to discipline, you know warnings and such. It's quite right to point out that when he gets upset he bans people.

Now if people keep that in mind, that it's just a veneer, then fine.

do i need to remind you all of the board rules?

apparently yes

I. I am the LORD your (former) King. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

II. Thou shalt praise me in all ye posts.

III. Obedience brings Victory and Victory is Life.

it's a weird affair

i have a half-mind to get back in that thread (AND TAKE UP THE BANNER OF OUR FALLEN HOMIES BAKS AND ADR BEST TROLLS 4EVA), but since wong literally ignored my post the first time around (maybe i should have thrown in a few 'fuck you assholes') and empiricism indicates will ban me if i try to pin him down again, idk how entertaining it could possibly be for you guys

adr wrote:lol b&wagon here i cum

*squirt*

finally, martyred at last!

when one hero falls

another will be right there to pick up the flag and carry on

so it be COMMANDED by your (former) KING

adr wrote:do i need to remind you all of the board rules?

apparently yes

I. I am the LORD your (former) King. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

II. Thou shalt praise me in all ye posts.

III. Obedience brings Victory and Victory is Life.

Promotion through attrition it is then!

Man, I know it's mike's board, but anything that even resembles censorship freaks me right the hell out. If he'd just banned ADR, I doubt i'd have a problem with it, but erasing all his posts like that, it's going too far.

If they ban a pile of people for posting here the only people that will remain there will be the sycophants and tryhards. I sincerely doubt many of the sensible people will want to stick around when the board culture and history try to say one thing while the actual behaviour says the opposite.

I don't see why I would be banned, unless it's for posting here, in which case no big deal. Their loss, in many more ways than just my quality posting.

adr wrote:when one hero falls

another will be right there to pick up the flag and carry on

so it be COMMANDED by your (former) KING

you can't expect to wield supreme power just cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!

Of course they recognize this as well so

adr wrote:rofl wong actually deleted all my posts

i wonder if that's actually why the board was down; scannign the database prolly ate up the hardware's availability

Wut ? Like, your posts in the thread, or in SDN everywhere ?

Everywhere.

Whatever man, I propose we forget about him being a big baby and proceed with Call of C

They already are Dan.

starku wrote:they've done it before

indeed, i recall one of them shortly after i joined and was still one of the tryhards myself

in 2005 or something


this newb came in and started saying something

i actually retorted with the "private property" party line and we went at it for a few pages

at some point hte newb got deleted - this was actually one of the very first uses of the delete thing as i recall, if not the first



now how funny will it be to dig that thread out of the hos

both sides were deletified!

Oxymoron wrote:

adr wrote:rofl wong actually deleted all my posts

i wonder if that's actually why the board was down; scannign the database prolly ate up the hardware's availability

Wut ? Like, your posts in the thread, or in SDN everywhere ?

Everywhere. He became an unperson.

Check his post record, he's only got one.

They outright erased every post he's ever made, even the ones before Wong left and he started talking shit about him (which yes, he has been doing. I don't think he's gone far enough to warrant banning or the erasure of his posts, but he does have something negative to say about wong at every opportunity.) This whole situation is spiraling into the shitter faster than I can blink.

Wonder how much that just broke the search.

ADR vaporised ? Shit's poetic in a way



So SDn is quickly becoming the "liberal" mirror image of HPCA, then ?



Fuck that place, let's play some Cutututulu