New Testingstan

Posted: **Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:26 pm**

white_rabbit has the most fatty nerd sig image ever

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:47 am**

I have sigs deactivated. It's a good way to live.

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:03 pm**

"Stanley Kubrick makes George Lucas look like Uwe Boll."

i've been waiting weeks for an excuse to say that

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:08 pm**

adr wrote:"Stanley Kubrick makes George Lucas look like Uwe Boll."

i've been waiting weeks for an excuse to say that

kubrick's kind of a hit or miss, but some of his movies really are a lot better than anything lucas has done

a clockwork orange was great

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:29 pm**

yeah. i liked a lot of his stuff. (and i liked a lot of what george lucas did too)

i just found that hilarious

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:33 pm**

whom does he make uwe boll look like?

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:51 pm**

Dooey Jo wrote:whom does he make uwe boll look like?

anybody who forgets to take the lens cap off

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:50 pm**

so jim raynor doesn't care about the debate

the one he made a 198 page pdf about

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:06 pm**

he cracks me up

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:14 pm**

chris have you read his rebuttal pdf thingo

becuase if you haven't i really recommend you do

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:16 pm**

i skimmed a few pages but it was p. boring nitpicky porcupining

though the best part was the "comics"

oh em gee

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:17 pm**

starku wrote:chris have you read his rebuttal pdf thingo

When you hit 198 pages the proper term is "manifesto"

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:19 pm**

adr wrote:i skimmed a few pages but it was p. boring nitpicky porcupining

though the best part was the "comics"

oh em gee

man that's what i thought was best

i mean i only skimmed it too

but he has reams of text attacking word use, misunderstood jokes, basically everything the rlm guy says, even if its not relevant to jims point

cwm 'manifesto' might be a good word because the document starts with a self-serving introduction and then goes pretty much nowhere

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:37 pm**

Next we'll hear hes been arrested outside RLM's house with a bucket of lube and a rubber fist.

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:46 pm**

starku wrote:cwm 'manifesto' might be a good word because the document starts with a self-serving introduction and then goes pretty much nowhere

I just used manifesto because writing a 198 page rebuttal to an internet review of a Star Wars movie puts one squarely in Unabomber territory.

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:48 pm**

well everyone who disagrees with him is an rlm fan right

even the ones who never watched anything on fuckin youtub

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:43 pm**

a spectre is haunting the internet - the spectre of tpm. all the powers of internet have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre.

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:30 pm**

"Zeon, let us not turn this into one of the "reengineer society in drastic authoritarian fashion" threads."

most unintentionally revealing comment ever posted on SDN y/n

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:31 pm**

thejester wrote:"Zeon, let us not turn this into one of the "reengineer society in drastic authoritarian fashion" threads."

most unintentionally revealing comment ever posted on SDN y/n

link

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:36 pm**

thejester wrote:"Zeon, let us not turn this into one of the "reengineer society in drastic authoritarian fashion" threads."

most unintentionally revealing comment ever posted on SDN y/n

hahahaha what

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:58 pm**

Zod wrote: link

Here

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:58 pm**

thejester wrote:"Zeon, let us not turn this into one of the "reengineer society in drastic authoritarian fashion" threads."

most unintentionally revealing comment ever posted on SDN y/n

it was so amazing that i actually posted in the thread

it's like you're peeping through a keyhole and BAM titties for a second

you're left wondering

did i see what i just saw
is this real?

Posted: **Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:51 pm**

i think this is even better

No, I just have the fault of often not stopping to realize how disconnected my worldview is from that of other people. It is very hard to remind one's self of that on a regular basis, and I am not particularly good at doing so. To me "severe punishment" would mean anything with lifelong consequences. This seemed somewhat obvious, and of course I know myself that I in fact only support the death penalty for a very small number of crimes. I'm quite certain in that respect you are trolling--I have debated on the death penalty many times on this board and it's somewhat clear that I was never advocating, even with your interpretation of the words I used, for people to be executed for failure to report. I think you are just trying to turn this thread into comedy gold for you and others to laugh at, so I'm not going to post in it again.

"trying to turn this thread into comedy gold for you and others to laugh at"

a certain clique indeed

also, i'm sorry i let someone through the spam filter

i didn't realize he could figure out the HAL code

Posted: **Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:25 am**

B-A-K-U-S-T-R-A wrote:
also, i'm sorry i let someone through the spam filter

i didn't realize he could figure out the HAL code

this is how 9-11 harbour leaks happened!

laxity

Posted: **Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:36 am**

starku wrote:did i see what i just saw
is this real?

I still get a chuckle whenever I remember her post in the Fukushima thread earlier this year. I HATE YOU!

New Testingstan

Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN