videojuegos
Re: videojuegos
Preordered the collector edition of Fo4 at my local gamestop.
I hope I'll be able to register the game on steam afterward, it isn't mandatory already. Getting DLCs and keeping the game updated might be a pain otherwise.
I hope I'll be able to register the game on steam afterward, it isn't mandatory already. Getting DLCs and keeping the game updated might be a pain otherwise.
No.
-
- Not a Brony (Probably lol)
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:17 am
Re: videojuegos
Ah yes. The "Missions" feature, which people are saying will be 3-4 hours worth of content at the most.joviwan wrote:Like all three of Battlefront's presentations explicitly stated--multiple times--that there was going to be a single-player experience.
For someone who spent countless hours playing Galactic Conquest, Campaign, and Instant action in BF2, it's very disappointing.
Re: videojuegos
joviwan wrote:ugh, FF7 remake. What a waste of time.
Re: videojuegos
Multiplayer is terrible anyway because people.Darksi4190 wrote:Ah yes. The "Missions" feature, which people are saying will be 3-4 hours worth of content at the most.joviwan wrote:Like all three of Battlefront's presentations explicitly stated--multiple times--that there was going to be a single-player experience.
For someone who spent countless hours playing Galactic Conquest, Campaign, and Instant action in BF2, it's very disappointing.
Like seriously I hated doing any FPS on multi and if it didn't have a single-player campaign I was like "lol nope" though I guess this has some kind of co-op so maybe, we'll see.
Re: videojuegos
Which nebulous "people" are you referring to? How do you "know" it will be 3-4 hours worth of content? How do you "know" it wont be repeatable?
Re: videojuegos
PUGs are highly variable but when I think of multiplayer I first think 'Gosh that looks like fun to play with my friends.'
-
- Not a Brony (Probably lol)
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:17 am
Re: videojuegos
It's what all the rumors are saying, and rumors are all I have to go on since DICE has said nothing about the single player content save that it exists, will be called "missions," and "you'll be happy with it."joviwan wrote:Which nebulous "people" are you referring to? How do you "know" it will be 3-4 hours worth of content? How do you "know" it wont be repeatable?
Re: videojuegos
I'm snipping because I didn't mentioned the 3-4 hours content bit.joviwan wrote:Which nebulous "people" are you referring to?
Anyway by "people" I mean the typical CoD fratboy or the usual trash talkers who enjoy pwning newbs and all that crap. I hate them and it makes my gaming less fun when I have to listen to them, or turn off the sound to avoid them.
But mostly it's that I suck at playing against actual people, as opposed to AIs, and dying every 30 seconds after I spawn isn't a lot of fun.
I much prefer coop over competitive multiplayer, essentially. Because I suck at the latter. Terribly.Stofsk wrote:PUGs are highly variable but when I think of multiplayer I first think 'Gosh that looks like fun to play with my friends.'
Re: videojuegos
Oh, sorry rogue, i wasn't referring to you
I have no umbrage with people who hate multi. People suck.
I have no umbrage with people who hate multi. People suck.
Re: videojuegos
I find MP hate to be silly. It's not my first preference and I do prefer gaming alone for the most part, but I won't kick a game out of bed because it has multi.
Re: videojuegos
I don't hate multiplayer, myself, and for many games it's a primary draw. I just also don't mind when people are put off by it, because I do kind of get it.
-
- Not a Brony (Probably lol)
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:17 am
Re: videojuegos
Don't get me wrong. I love Multi, when I have a reliable staple of friends to play with. I put plenty of hours into Halo: Reach, Halo 4, Counter-Strike, etc.
The issue with the new Battlefront is that i've never been able to build that kind of player group with a Dice game before. All of my IRL friends stopped playing Battlefield at 2142, and none of my online friends play it either. with Battlefield 3 and 4, I played the 3-4 hours of singleplayer stuff, did maybe 3-4 hours of multi, then used them as coasters and paperweights. I see no indication that things will be any different with Battlefront. If i'm not going to get my money's worth out of a game i'm not going to buy it. Maybe if SB or SV throws together a squad or clan for it i'll reconsider.
The issue with the new Battlefront is that i've never been able to build that kind of player group with a Dice game before. All of my IRL friends stopped playing Battlefield at 2142, and none of my online friends play it either. with Battlefield 3 and 4, I played the 3-4 hours of singleplayer stuff, did maybe 3-4 hours of multi, then used them as coasters and paperweights. I see no indication that things will be any different with Battlefront. If i'm not going to get my money's worth out of a game i'm not going to buy it. Maybe if SB or SV throws together a squad or clan for it i'll reconsider.
Re: videojuegos
Because it has multi or because it's primarily multi? To me that's a key difference.Stofsk wrote:I find MP hate to be silly. It's not my first preference and I do prefer gaming alone for the most part, but I won't kick a game out of bed because it has multi.
I mean, I'll play Halo and certain CoDs if I find their SP content good enough. Heck I even enjoy Rainbow Six Vegas 2. But take a game like APB: Reloaded which is essentially MMOFPS and pretty much the only thing to do ever is PvP and yeah...I lost interest in that one quick.
So maybe I should refine my position to be less about SP vs MP, and say I prefer PvE over (primarily) PvP, even in a non-MMO context (MP with allies vs AI opponents in a strategy game, for example). Even if I have an alleged "team" and it's not just a massive FFA.
Re: videojuegos
To be fair re: APB: Reloaded: that game is fucking awful, completely independent of what kind of game it was. Like, there are plenty of good PvP multi-games
APB was not one of them
APB was not one of them
Re: videojuegos
I replayed Alpha Protocol. Yes, it's buggy. Yes, the AI is I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP. Yes, the controls are clunky. But I really, really wish someone would take the concept of a dynamic storyline and run with it. I think I saw less than 50% of the story from my original run and there were whole subplots I missed the first time around because I played like a fucktard.
Also, game design tip: if you have a game that allows you to play the whole thing stealthily, and which makes a stealth build 100% viable, don't make the finale a shoot-'em-up. I only got through the last few checkpoints by first exploiting bugs (lol chopper won't move when I'm behind this rock) and then just waiting behind a corner while my I-win-button bullet time skill reloaded.
Also, game design tip: if you have a game that allows you to play the whole thing stealthily, and which makes a stealth build 100% viable, don't make the finale a shoot-'em-up. I only got through the last few checkpoints by first exploiting bugs (lol chopper won't move when I'm behind this rock) and then just waiting behind a corner while my I-win-button bullet time skill reloaded.
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.
Re: videojuegos
+1 for the autocomplete being even better in context
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.
- Crazedwraith
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:25 am
Re: videojuegos
I've forgotten what that replacement filters on. Was it retard? I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP or something? Oh yay for the thought police.
To the Brave passengers and crew of the Kobayashi Maru... Sucks to be you
Re: videojuegos
You know you're getting old when you don't remember the injokes of the board you were a member on on day one.
Or when you're a member of a board. What's the cool thing these days? Voat?
Or when you're a member of a board. What's the cool thing these days? Voat?
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.
Re: videojuegos
MethBounty wrote:What's the cool thing these days? Voat?
It used to be cigarettes
Re: videojuegos
I'm playing SWTOR again. And even paid for a subscription.
What is wrong with me?
What is wrong with me?
-
- Not a Brony (Probably lol)
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:17 am
Re: videojuegos
I know rite?
Re: videojuegos
I've come around on subs for MMOs. Especially after freemium has become the standard. I'd rather just pay for a month and then move on to another game.
Re: videojuegos
I wish there were more options for LTS, TBH. Mainly because I feel like if I miss a few days playing I wasted money, which is annoying.Stofsk wrote:I've come around on subs for MMOs. Especially after freemium has become the standard. I'd rather just pay for a month and then move on to another game.
But then the specific thing about TOR is that I mostly started (re)playing for the story. Mechanically I just don't find it all that fun. But some of the class stories are enjoyable.
I guess there are probably cutscene videos aplenty on YouTube, but there's no guarantee any particular video will pick the dialogue choices I want to see, so I really do have to play it myself. Alas.
- Big Orangutan
- Hipster
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 8:37 pm
Re: videojuegos
I find GTA Online a little hard and slow to get into, and online multiplayer hasn't developed the reputation of experienced multiplayers freezing out newbies for nothing.joviwan wrote:I don't hate multiplayer, myself, and for many games it's a primary draw. I just also don't mind when people are put off by it, because I do kind of get it.
*Insert Pretentious Quote Here*
Re: videojuegos
TOR's current subscription perks are really great if you want to run through a Bioware story. And TOR does offer something that basically no other game does right now: A co-op RPG.
Playing with your friends spontaneously is fucking hell, and as an MMO, TOR fails hard here. But syncing up with one friend regularly works pretty close to brilliantly.
Playing with your friends spontaneously is fucking hell, and as an MMO, TOR fails hard here. But syncing up with one friend regularly works pretty close to brilliantly.