New Testingstan

evilsoup wrote:I'm shamefully ignorant of the Spanish civil war, but weren't the Communists there largely backed by the Soviets? Or at least, weren't they following leninist/stalinist ideology, which would conflict with anarchism pretty badly?

OSCSSW wrote:I've been reading some of your posts of last week. Looks like you not knowing "Jack sh!t" about a subject, especially one that is none of you damn Brit business, has stopped you from making an A$$ out of your self. So why don't you just go on and shoot that big ignorant mouth of yours off about kerry as secDef?

Or

Try shutting up long enough to read what people who know that traitor actually have to say about the SOB? Oh I'm sorry, for a second I thought I was speaking to man and not
an obnoxious little kid.

Winston Smith wrote:You know, I'm probably gonna regret this, but lay off the guy SC. He's asking questions, which is important. And US politics is vitally important in the UK.

OSCSSW wrote:Poor baby. Did I hurt his/hers/it's or your feelings sweetheart?

What the US does is none of your damn business in the UK. ISA, US internal politics are no business of yours. I am sick and tired of reading what you Brits think the US is doing wrong.
Your own "F"ed up HAS BEEN, FAST BECOMING THIRD WOLRLD SH!T HOLE of a once
great nation is your own doing. Why would anyone but a blithering idiot stand for a failure
telling us what we, the last super power, should do? I call it abject arrogance on your part based on a very, very well deserved inferiority complex.

When you straighten out the UK then, I just might want to waste time reading what you think. Until then you and garbage mouth M...UK can just shut the hell up.

Got it now or do I have to use crayons?


ISA The interanl politics of a sovereign state are none of your business.

Theodore wrote:OK, green table time. Senior Chief, you will not abuse your shipmates. We discuss things in a civil manner. I refer you to Stu's thoughts on the subject:

Will everybody please remember that ths community consists mostly of friends who have known each other a long time A very long time by Internet standards. So, please try and keep the environment here one of cordiality. That doesn't mean opinions can't be expressed strongly or forcefully but an appropriate degree of restraint is desirable. There might be flare-ups now and then to clear the air but they should be the exceptions not the rule and the administration will cool them down.

I'm sure nobody here wants this community to degenerate into the kind of sewer where obscene language and screaming personal insults substitute for discussion. There are far too many communitys like that already and I would hate to see us join their ranks. The problem is that its relatively easy to hold a level of "goodness" but very hard to stop a descent into the abyss once the slide starts. So, if we seema bit picky sometimes, our intentions are good even if they might not seem that way at the time.

If you cannot live up to these standards then you may wish to put in for a transfer.

OSCSSW wrote:

Theodore wrote:OK, green table time. Senior Chief, you will not abuse your shipmates.

Theo, my reply to comrad Chris was not in response to his question on kerry/SecDef. I am addressing the long list of postings made by him during my week's absence that I consider totally arrogant and insulting coming form a Brit. He is a foreigner taking up the cause of our current criminal regime and the other DNC traiors. IMO, by defending and supportung their actions and ideas he is attcking the constitutionof the USA and as a foreignerr He has ZERO right to do so with impunity.

Theodore wrote:Theo that decison is way above your paygrade.

Jimlad you still think it was an over reaction?

OK mate what if I wrote "YOUR queen is a crack whore and she rules a nation of idiots too dumb to govern themselves!" How does that sit with you?

That is the way I think of what Comrade Chris has been writing about my constitution by backing the policies of our criminal regime and the DNC.

Get it now Jimlad?

Stu, that's my response to Theo's "caution" Take whatever "discipinary action"---))))
you think is warranted.

Theodore wrote:Yeah...I really don't think so. Sayonara, Chief.

Oxymoron wrote:As for the Ron Paul => lesser evil thingy, that was I think the main aspect of his *air quote* support *air quote* of Ron Paul.

I have always perceived ADR as being sympathetic to Libertarianism to varying degrees.

adr wrote:I don't like labels because they never perfectly fit, but people have a habit of assuming they do (bringing guilt by association stuff).

Losonti Tokash wrote:lol yes ron "I think we all know how fleet of foot black people can be" paul was clearly the best choice

Gands wrote:Could this be the end of OLD WHITE MAN SAYS?

adr wrote:I don't like labels because they never perfectly fit, but people have a habit of assuming they do (bringing guilt by association stuff).

Negative Knub wrote:he may be anti war and all of that good shit, but he's still an anti-government stooge.

Darksi4190 wrote:Seriously? The dude with the turban-bomb avatar got booted?

Maybe there is some hope for that place after all.