Page 97 of 488

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:16 am
by weemadando
*milknose*

"discrimination against other races is totally different to discrimination against fags because black people look different."

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:24 am
by Agent Bert Macklin
He'll just run away like he always does without any penalties. But I can call Helpdesk Moron a "cunt" and be banned. It's pretty awesome.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:26 am
by Zod
weemadando wrote:*milknose*

"discrimination against other races is totally different to discrimination against fags because black people look different."

nobody tell chockles about abortion clinic bombers

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:50 am
by Agent Bert Macklin
Cunt Cockula apologies for the Muslim derailment but not for his bigotry. It's too bad people like him don't have their voting privileges revoked and then sent to a labor camp where they would be useful. I guess he's too busy smoking around his kid.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:54 am
by Phantasee
You're an idiot.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:10 am
by Bakustra
Phantasee wrote:You're an idiot.
you can't lead people to enlightenment, phant

all you can do is show them the way

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:13 am
by Bakustra
anyways, back to draggin-thread:
Gormless wrote:There are as many as there are possibly alignment combinations in the D&D rules (in fact, that's a key element to one of the best fixes to the alignment system I've ever seen).
since this does not link to a 72-point red DON'T USE ALIGNMENTS, this is wrong
Dormless wrote:Dealing with them, well, read Stuart's Armageddon. Or not, it kinda wastes a perfectly good plot by having terrible prose ("Balls" lol). But you get the idea.
hahahahahahahahahaaa

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:16 am
by Agent Bert Macklin
Phantasee wrote:You're an idiot.
His views just piss me off.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:43 am
by Zod
B-A-K-U-S-T-R-A wrote:anyways, back to draggin-thread:
Gormless wrote:There are as many as there are possibly alignment combinations in the D&D rules (in fact, that's a key element to one of the best fixes to the alignment system I've ever seen).
since this does not link to a 72-point red DON'T USE ALIGNMENTS, this is wrong
Dormless wrote:Dealing with them, well, read Stuart's Armageddon. Or not, it kinda wastes a perfectly good plot by having terrible prose ("Balls" lol). But you get the idea.
hahahahahahahahahaaa
nerds get confused when you try and explain morality beyond simple binary concepts like good and evil

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:54 am
by Flagg
B-A-K-U-S-T-R-A wrote:
Phantasee wrote:You're an idiot.
you can't lead people to enlightenment, phant

all you can do is show them the way

And gas them, apparently.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:03 am
by Bakustra
i hope to see some angry posts from gormless when he checks draggin-thread again

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:09 am
by Flagg
B-A-K-U-S-T-R-A wrote:i hope to see some angry posts from gormless when he checks draggin-thread again
Gas him, too. Gas for everyone!

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:20 am
by Gands
that dragon thread is painful to read

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:13 am
by Flagg
Gands wrote:that dragon thread is painful to read
Duh. LOSING!

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:54 am
by Gands
everyone seems so emotional

do not understand

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:06 am
by Djinnkitty83
That dragon thread hurts. We need more people pulling out the hilarious backdoors and logical consequences of following DnD rules to the letter there.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:48 pm
by adr-admin
i just read that straha vs rogue thread

and wow


my fav parts

3.) In what way is the history of sexuality, of all things, related to the discussion at hand?


and

3.) "Biopower?" What the fuck is this, the Matrix? :lol: I'm not impressed by random lunatics making up scary-sounding words as a means of leveraging their brain-dead ideas.



incredible.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:12 pm
by Veef
no one can beat Palpatine with enough prep time

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:21 pm
by Aaron
The same could be said of Roy Batty, and he's actually an interesting character. As opposed to the cackling raisin.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:25 pm
by Bakustra
Djinnkitty83 wrote:That dragon thread hurts. We need more people pulling out the hilarious backdoors and logical consequences of following DnD rules to the letter there.
I love that nobody got my original post or even challenged the Diplomancer, instead focusing on the Peasant Railgun. But I have a number of other plans of attack.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:17 pm
by Veef
Aaron wrote:The same could be said of Roy Batty, and he's actually an interesting character. As opposed to the cackling raisin.
I love that Rutger Hauer ;-;

Especially in Blind Fury

Also did you notice after the UNLIMITED POWAAAAAAH scene, Palpatine has a little orgasm on screen

For kids

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:10 pm
by Djinnkitty83
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... &start=750

Hahahahaha...

Dalton revives the RLM thread from the dead to... bitch about it... though without naming any names.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:17 pm
by adr-admin
indeed

i wanna axe

"to whom are you sepaking and plz define 'the shit'"

but i kinda want it to just go on to see what the mods do. it's just a matter of time before jimmy comes back anyway

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:22 pm
by Zod
Djinnkitty83 wrote:http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... &start=750

Hahahahaha...

Dalton revives the RLM thread from the dead to... bitch about it... though without naming any names.
i'm honestly more amazed that the africa egypt thread got necroed in slam

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:36 pm
by Djinnkitty83
I can't stop laughing at this:
Dalton wrote:Cut the shit or I will detail some of the more unpleasant moderators to come in here and clean house.
In context, it's like a goldmine of why this thread exists in the first place.

1) The thread was dead for three days, and before that the discussion had turned quite civil again, with the main antagonistic elements having fled. The 'shit' was effectively cut until he necro'd it. Way to shoot yourself in the foot.
2) It took thirty pages and well over a month of shit (plus specific requests from posters) before any reaction. Way to stay on top of the situation.
3) Mods have already been and gone in the thread with no real change to the substance, one of them being regarded as one of the more 'unpleasant' mods. Way to posture.
4) Pretty much every major participant in the discussion has flat out stated that they don't care if the thread gets locked or HoS'd. Way to restore faith in the management.