New Testingstan

RogueIce wrote:

uraniun235 wrote:see, to my mind, the way to short-circuit non-provided answers would be to say "attempting to derail the train or repair the brakes or take any action besides the ones provided to you will, with absolute certainty, cause the train to crash into and painfully maim and kill busloads of innocent children, whose circumstances would have guaranteed that they would grow up to contribute in a meaningful and carbon-negative fashion to society. (feel free to take this ill-conceived joke of mine further)

Aren't nuns usually involved for some reason?

nuns are so passe

uraniun235 wrote:also this thread inspired me to go check out the internet's enclave of logical discussion, and holy lol is that place fuckin' dead or what

like compared to this ghost town or

hey that's usually my line 'soup

i could post more but I've kinda just been spamming facebook about marriage speculation and I don't think that's interesting

...to anyone

evilsoup wrote:

uraniun235 wrote:also this thread inspired me to go check out the internet's enclave of logical discussion, and holy lol is that place fuckin' dead or what

like compared to this ghost town or

compared to how active it used to be

I followed Frod to SV. It's nice over there.

SV is alright, at least it isn't full of itself like SDN

joviwan wrote:I followed Frod to SV. It's nice over there.

I've checked it out a couple of times, but most of the people I interact with stayed on SB, so there wasn't much point in switching.

what is sv?

Sufficient Velocity

http://forums.sufficientvelocity.com/

It's got a more active community and actively discourages caustic verbal abuse and toughguyism so it's nice.

oh i see thx

adr wrote:what is sv?

SB's version of here

Of course the drama that prompted SV's split was more important to more people than the Testingpocolypse on SDN, so they got more members than we did.

Hey, I like our little gang.

timmy wrote:Hey, I like our little gang.

+1

That's why I'm still here, yo.

y'all'r pretty ace.

Instinctively, we don't want to put women in dangerous situations because eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap etc. Now, if Ghostbusting is supposed to be intrinsically dangerous (which is how it was protrayed in the originals, albeit in a lighthearted way) then sending attractive women like Jessica Alba, Demi Lovato, Taylor Swift and Ryan seacrea- I mean Julianne Hough into danger MAY threaten the viewers suspension of disbelief, but, if you make it a straight up comedy... well, who DOESN'T want to see melissa Mcarthy slimed, or possessed/drunk and spewing pornographic and sacreligious filth? (i.e. her average saturday night)

Instinctively, we don't want to put women in dangerous situations because eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap etc.

like, read this line a couple times, it came out of a person's keyboard and deserves your full attention



"what about the EEEEEEEEGGGGGGSSSSSS " - my instinctive response to a woman crossing a road alone

I
um


ok nevermind, I guess that's from the other place
yeah that's pretty awful

it gets better for a while


then turns into a mess of huge broken-up posts and military acronyms because why not


anyway, that's my recent visit to SLAM story

The real question is, will our new lady Ghostbusters have tight jumpsuits zipped down to their navels?

I mean I'm sure the inevitable porn parody movie will. But the mainstream one?

eggs actually are really expensive

but they bind all good things together so i pay the price

have you tried sperm instead?


it's cheaper so you can use more of it even if it is not as good

#5 Feminism for all its ups and downs has one major flaw: If women are allowed reproductive choice (especially ABSOLUTE reproductive choice) they will choose to delay, avoid or terminate pregnancies. being that we need 2.1 babies per woman just to Maintain the population.... where do you think this leads? Especially with an economic system DESIGNED around population growth?

be fair though, it looks like everyone else in that thread is telling this guy to fuck off

timmy wrote:Hey, I like our little gang.

agreed

timmy wrote:Hey, I like our little gang.

yeah

Dooey Jo wrote:Instinctively, we don't want to put women in dangerous situations because eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap etc. Now, if Ghostbusting is supposed to be intrinsically dangerous (which is how it was protrayed in the originals, albeit in a lighthearted way) then sending attractive women like Jessica Alba, Demi Lovato, Taylor Swift and Ryan seacrea- I mean Julianne Hough into danger MAY threaten the viewers suspension of disbelief, but, if you make it a straight up comedy... well, who DOESN'T want to see melissa Mcarthy slimed, or possessed/drunk and spewing pornographic and sacreligious filth? (i.e. her average saturday night)

How on earth do you think that Ghostbusters is anything but a comedy