You should have went with 'I'm writing a book'Just for my education, as you never know when those things might be useful...
I'm not going to become an accessory to murder, mang
You should have went with 'I'm writing a book'Just for my education, as you never know when those things might be useful...
Fucking AOxymoron wrote:In unrelated new, I'm now craving for a kebab.
Watch at your own risk : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MCbTvoNrAgadr wrote:bbc thing about nuclear armageddon?
i've heard of it but never seen it
I think it's usually more anger at religious institutions and people than anger at God, though it does often seem to come with a side of "if the God these people believe in did exist, I wouldn't like Him either!"Civil War Man wrote:This kind of angry atheist usually strikes me as something akin to the atheist caricature that shows up in movies where a character's beliefs are relevant to the plot. Their stance is not necessarily due to genuine disbelief, but because they are angry at the (usually Judeo-Christian) god that they claim to disbelieve.
I can see this. My grandmother was kind of like this. Religion caused her nothing but misery, to the point where for a while she could have been more accurately described as anti-theist. It wasn't about the existence or non-existence of God at all. She had a special kind of hate for Catholicism in particular, which not coincidentally was the religion she was raised in.Jung wrote:I think it's usually more anger at religious institutions and people than anger at God, though it does often seem to come with a side of "if the God these people believe in did exist, I wouldn't like Him either!"
I can also see this. Even at my smuggest, I wasn't as bad as most. But I was raised in a place where a lot of people identify as religious, but tend to have more of a live-and-let-live theology than fire-and-brimstone. I mean, in the lead up to the recent same sex marriage bill, I saw a commercial that had a local Presbyterian priest talking about how good it would be for the state.It makes sense to me that the worst smug/evangelical atheists would often be the ones for whom atheism is a repudiation of things they previously believed. They bought into some kind of toxic religion that wasn't doing good things for them, or they had negative experiences with religious people, and for them atheism was a salvation from that or a repudiation of their abusers.
Just speaking from personal experience, I think a lot of the negativity I have/had toward religion comes from having once bought into a pretty toxic version of conservative Christianity and remembering how it made me a both unhappier and worse person.
I'd have to agree with this. Even the most angry among those who were formerly part of another religion temper it with some understanding, because no matter how much they look down on it, they remember that they were once a part of it and have some understanding of how other people can be a part of it too. The extreme end of smugtheists, on the other hand, give off a strong vibe of a complete lack of understanding and empathy about religious fervor of almost any level.Dooey Jo wrote:I would think most angry athiests have had very few actual experiences with religions, and most of their "stupid fundie" stories stem from youtube comment battles (of course in the old days they would stem from forum excursions or newsgroups). Their anger, while surely not faked as such, is a way to ensure group cohesion, like in all other hilariously macho groups.
thx i'll totes check it out prolly over the weekendOxymoron wrote:Watch at your own risk : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MCbTvoNrAg
See, now I want to be back in Munich. When I was there the nearest kebab shop was 100 meters from my hotel.Aaron wrote:Fucking AOxymoron wrote:In unrelated new, I'm now craving for a kebab.
Oh, god, I would pay some serious money for good kebabs right now. The nearest good place I know of is about 45 minutes away this time of day though.Oxymoron wrote:In unrelated new, I'm now craving for a kebab.
If that were true, he'd never go after anyone.Gands wrote:Doesn't Bats usually only go after those lower on the social ladder than he?
He goes after anyone he thinks he can win against.Gands wrote:Doesn't Bats usually only go after those lower on the social ladder than he?
Stofsk wrote:He goes after anyone he thinks he can win against.Gands wrote:Doesn't Bats usually only go after those lower on the social ladder than he?
EDIT: Marina, I read your post and one thing I'd like to add is that ST ships have displayed some high acceleration as well, which may be suitable for consideration by you. In TMP the Enterprise goes to full impulse from earth orbit and is seen in the next scene flying past Jupiter and we're told something like an hour or two has passed. In 'Best of Both Worlds' the figures are even higher, the Borg Cube was spotted by an outpost on Jupiter and Riker asked Wesley how long it would take them to reach earth at their current speed, and he said 27 mins. Extraordinarily, when the Enterprise-D drops out of warp its seen flying past Saturn and Crusher gave an ETA for their interception at 23 mins.
Also, proving itself the episode that keeps on giving, The Die Is Cast also shows high acceleration figures from the Defiant and one of the few examples of BVR combat we see in TNG era Star Trek. The Defiant covers a distance of over 50,000km in just a few seconds, and in that whole time they're being fired upon by a couple of Jem'hadar fighters.