Page 123 of 488

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:00 am
by Count Chocula
Who's raheem morris?

also false anger does not translate well on bbs WHODATHUNKIT

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
by Flagg
Count Chocula wrote:Who's raheem morris?
Coach of the Tampon Gay Fuckingqueers, and your boyfriend.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:15 am
by Phantasee
inclusive language please

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:16 am
by Count Chocula
oH, THAT guy. I'm busy and tend to lose track of who's who.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:31 am
by Flagg
Phantasee wrote:inclusive language please
Canuk. :P

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:47 am
by Aaron
Well at least he's willing to talk from the veiwpoint of a conservative. Plus I like his 2012 sig.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:53 pm
by adr-admin
Dark Hellion wrote:Why bother with pointing this out though? It should have been obvious to anyone that this was just DXIII dropping some camouflaged flamebait and hoping someone would jump on it. He probably thinks he is being funny and clever by skirting the letter of the law to circumvent the spirit.

Maybe this shithead can finally be banned. I know there are a few others who could use it too. It would be nice to read N&P for one day and not have to wade through the pedantic shit that fills this forum.
Admiral Drason wrote:Chocula don't get too worked up I'm pretty sure DXIII is just trolling with that line.

LOLOL

It would be nice to read N&P for one day and not have to wade through the pedantic shit that fills this forum.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:37 pm
by Aaron
Yes, please make the board an even bigger circlejerk.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:59 pm
by RedImperator
adr wrote:
Dark Hellion wrote:Why bother with pointing this out though? It should have been obvious to anyone that this was just DXIII dropping some camouflaged flamebait and hoping someone would jump on it. He probably thinks he is being funny and clever by skirting the letter of the law to circumvent the spirit.

Maybe this shithead can finally be banned. I know there are a few others who could use it too. It would be nice to read N&P for one day and not have to wade through the pedantic shit that fills this forum.
Admiral Drason wrote:Chocula don't get too worked up I'm pretty sure DXIII is just trolling with that line.

LOLOL

It would be nice to read N&P for one day and not have to wade through the pedantic shit that fills this forum.
LOL. Dark Hellion is, always has been, and always will be, a butthurt tryhard.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:52 pm
by Sandman
Aaron wrote:Yes, please make the board an even bigger circlejerk.
I'm not sure that's actually possible at this point. I'm fairly sure there is an entry in a textbook somewhere about how communities very much like SDN tend to form as an inevitable side-effect of mutual ivory tower ego-stroking. And if there isn't, there ought to be. Coupled with the inherently combative attitude that the board has as one of the very first lines (the whole 'mockery of stupid people' thing), and it's very little surprise that the place turns into a gigantic group-masturbatory orgy an intellectual crucible.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:18 pm
by adr-admin
as an experiment i want to someday do an anonymous debate board, where there's no authorship information attached to posts

would the quality get worse as ppl become fuckwads w/ no accountability

or would the quality improve as there's nothing to judge except content so egos don't get involved?

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:19 pm
by starku
even obscuring authorship for a few hours or making it an action to find out would be interesting

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:26 pm
by starku
ps

not only has teo canonised the highschool concept of 'crushes' (ie wanting to bone someone but not having the spine to do anything about it)

but they have also declared anyone who 'has a crush' is inherently flawed and unable to manage a relationship


IN AN EXAMPLE WHERE THEY DISPLAYED DISATISFACTION WITH A RELATIONSHIP

forest for trees man it's HILARIOUS

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:26 pm
by Zod
adr wrote:as an experiment i want to someday do an anonymous debate board, where there's no authorship information attached to posts

would the quality get worse as ppl become fuckwads w/ no accountability

or would the quality improve as there's nothing to judge except content so egos don't get involved?
you could always just visit 4chan

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:27 pm
by starku
he probably isn't a child molester

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:15 pm
by Aaron
starku wrote:ps

not only has teo canonised the highschool concept of 'crushes' (ie wanting to bone someone but not having the spine to do anything about it)

but they have also declared anyone who 'has a crush' is inherently flawed and unable to manage a relationship


IN AN EXAMPLE WHERE THEY DISPLAYED DISATISFACTION WITH A RELATIONSHIP

forest for trees man it's HILARIOUS
man, is ARSE still a festering shitpit of swooning virgins and married fattiness who can't figure out how they scored in the first place?

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:16 pm
by uraniun235
starku wrote:ps

not only has teo canonised the highschool concept of 'crushes' (ie wanting to bone someone but not having the spine to do anything about it)

but they have also declared anyone who 'has a crush' is inherently flawed and unable to manage a relationship


IN AN EXAMPLE WHERE THEY DISPLAYED DISATISFACTION WITH A RELATIONSHIP

forest for trees man it's HILARIOUS
is this recent or was this a notorious thread from long ago, i almost never go into ARSE

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:17 pm
by starku
Currently active thread

Someone looking for advice = chance to show off our mastery of DATING SCIENCE???

It's almost as good as batman asking for help then being a shithead to everyone who tries

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:18 pm
by uraniun235
jesus looks like i'll have to take a look

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:18 pm
by Aaron
Don't, you'll never get that feeling of innocence back.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:23 pm
by uraniun235
oh it's just lagmonster and serafina, for a moment i thought it was going to be a big grand trainwreck of a thread where everyone jumps in to pile on

looks like ARSE in general is still a hole, though.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:51 pm
by Phantasee
Hahahaha Aaron you crack me up with that innocence line :lol:

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:05 am
by RedImperator
starku wrote:even obscuring authorship for a few hours or making it an action to find out would be interesting
Newspaper comment sections don't give me much hope.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:12 am
by starku
well applyign it to an existing communcity rather than random old people might be different

MAYBE

ok prolly not

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:16 am
by adr-admin
there's one way to find out


randomized usernames