Page 164 of 488

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:50 am
by Flagg
starku wrote:well gollum is the guy who wanted to destroy the ring and save the world so much he ate a finger

lets all raise a finger

thanks gollum
I don't remember it that way, but I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:11 am
by Nietzslime
Flagg wrote:
starku wrote:ps frodo turned evil

I love people who fail to realize that Samwise is the actual hero of the story and that Frodo is a wealthy spoiled fuckwit.
i don't know how much voluntarily traveling miles into a wasteland bearing a corrupting and ancient artifact and getting stabbed and hunted along the way can be considered spoiling a person

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:18 am
by Flagg
Nietzslime wrote:
Flagg wrote:
starku wrote:ps frodo turned evil

I love people who fail to realize that Samwise is the actual hero of the story and that Frodo is a wealthy spoiled fuckwit.
i don't know how much voluntarily traveling miles into a wasteland bearing a corrupting and ancient artifact and getting stabbed and hunted along the way can be considered spoiling a person
He was spoiled before that.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:29 am
by Nietzslime
Flagg wrote: He was spoiled before that.
i don't think you know what 'spoiling' means

(ps generally it means someone whose cozy lifestyle has left them unable to handle responsibilities or pressure somewhere well short of when they're near death inside an evil volcano being brainwashed by a fallen angel's magic ring)

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:56 am
by Flagg
Nietzslime wrote:
Flagg wrote: He was spoiled before that.
i don't think you know what 'spoiling' means

(ps generally it means someone whose cozy lifestyle has left them unable to handle responsibilities or pressure somewhere well short of when they're near death inside an evil volcano being brainwashed by a fallen angel's magic ring)
If you keep poking holes in my logic I'll find you. I'll find you and do things to you. Stuff. Weird stuff. Butt stuff.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:14 am
by Nietzslime
woah buddy

that was your cue to get super self-serious and antagonistic

don't you understand how internet debate works?!

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:20 am
by starku
In the spirit of justice

I name you both trolls

Now write a paper on what youve done

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:53 am
by Flagg
starku wrote:In the spirit of justice

I name you both trolls

Now write a paper on what youve done
I was just going to rip off a wiki article and post it here as my own content in response. Then I got there and they was closed. Just like my mom and the abortion clinic. :cry:

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:50 am
by xon
Dalton gets amazingly butthurt whenever Murdoch rag/tv channel get's called out on it's biases.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:02 am
by Flagg
It makes no sense to me considering he works for the competition.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:18 am
by Stofsk
i thought it was pretty clear he was just fed up with SpaceMarine shitting in every thread

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:20 am
by Flagg
Stofsk wrote:i thought it was pretty clear he was just fed up with SpaceMarine shitting in every thread
No, he's done it before. Even defending their "mistakes" where they would label scandal ridden Republicans as Democrats.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:30 am
by starku
what is funnier

aerius posting ignorant conspiracy theory nonsense

or idiots lapping it up and saying they are PREPARED

i mean every time i see beowulf say INVEST IN LEAD ROFFLE COPTORS GUNS R COOL

i want to post 'maybe you should invest in friends instead, because my gang is just going to steal whatever you own lol'

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:35 am
by Flagg
Dude we are getting like a foot of snow right. And it will all be melted off in like 3 days. But everyone is FREAKING THE FUCK OUT. It's hilarious.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:18 pm
by adr-admin
im thinking dalton just wants to make sure the little guy isn't being blamed for those errors

if there's something wrong it's the system not the ppl

and he is the ppl

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:27 pm
by Flagg
adr wrote:im thinking dalton just wants to make sure the little guy isn't being blamed for those errors

if there's something wrong it's the system not the ppl

and he is the ppl

Yeah, but he's the one blaming the little guy, saying it was a series of unfortunate dumbass mistakes rather than a concerted attempt to make Democrats look bad.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:50 pm
by adr-admin
dumbass mistakes aren't really anyone's fault

especially since the people have little notice on what they need and apparently work with tools from the stone age


i talked to him on facebook about a bad graph and was like "dont they just use excel so BOOM MADE" but he said they just whip them up in photoshop by hand

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:53 pm
by Zod
adr wrote:dumbass mistakes aren't really anyone's fault

especially since the people have little notice on what they need and apparently work with tools from the stone age


i talked to him on facebook about a bad graph and was like "dont they just use excel so BOOM MADE" but he said they just whip them up in photoshop by hand
a pattern of dumbass mistakes is rather suspicious though

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:59 pm
by Metatwaddle
i don't remember the details but the republicans labeled as democrats tended to be ones that had fallen out of fox news's good graces

like arlen specter when he was grilling alberto gonzalez, and larry craig after his fall from grace

(this was years before specter switched parties obviously)

two of them probably isn't enough for a conclusion but iirc there were others

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:08 pm
by Veef
On the Paul-ojiichan front

putting yourself all over your website makes you look like a douche

I agree with the point he's making

but I think he can tone down the "us vs them" mentality

it's the thing that keeps me out of political discussion cuz i don't want to alienate friends over these things

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:09 pm
by adr-admin
i wouldn't be surprised that (assuming the bias is statstically significant) it is caused by the kind of stories they like to tell

imagine you're the graphics guy

day after day the producers tell you to whip up these graphics

and most the time a negative story is a (d) fellow



so then one day they want a graphic for a negative story and it's an (r) but when you're in your photoshop rush you don't refer back to the paper for everything

and since most the negative stories are (d) you just type that without really thinking about it



and then the proofreader makes the same mistake so it makes it's way to the air





but this way no individual in the news office is consciously making the decision "we hate this guy now call him a democRAT"

but rather they fuck it up due to an existing habit

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:15 pm
by Zod
well i get the impression it was along the lines of "Hey, this guy's acting like a Democrat, so why do we keep calling him a Republican?"

"Great idea, switch his letter to "D", nobody'll notice!"

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:48 pm
by Phantasee
Fun fact: last night we confirmed Simple English Wikipedia works and today I discovered the mobile site is working just fine. We can all rest easy now, research is still doable.

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:27 pm
by Losonti Tokash
uh, so does regular wikipedia, so

anyway dalton works for a company that represents virtually identical interests to murdoch and such so not really a surprise he'd want to defend them

Re: Godammed SDN

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:50 pm
by Dooey Jo
wikipedia works if you turn off javascript

seems to be really slow though