Page 167 of 488
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:02 am
by Flagg
Stofsk wrote:Nietzslime wrote:aw gee whiz i always miss the promotions
be the power behind the throne
it's all part of the game
You mod or you die!
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:37 am
by Darth Fanboy
ADR make me an admin. I want to change Flagg's username every couple of days or so.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:40 am
by adr-admin
by your command
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:43 am
by Zod
i just want to change flagg's avatar every couple of days
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:47 am
by adr-admin
lolz
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:48 am
by Nietzslime
i want to change the way we look at movies with 3d technology
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:50 am
by Zod
Nietzslime wrote:i want to change the way we look at movies with 3d technology
glasses free or get out
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:53 am
by adr-admin
UNLIMITED POWER
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:57 am
by Zod
YES
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:57 am
by Nietzslime
shep is apparently the voice of the mods
welp
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:04 am
by adr-admin
i couldn't help posting in one of the thousand sopa threads
whelp
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:53 am
by Flagg
Not funny. Fucking hilarious.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:59 am
by RogueIce
Stofsk wrote:Aaron wrote:Annoucements and HoS!
Man wtf?
Those are just forums every mod has powers in. They're just deciding on where to place D.Turtle and I.
Did they tell you this or are you guessing?
Either way it seems like kind of a sloppy way to assign mods.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:12 am
by RogueIce
RogueIce wrote:Stofsk wrote:Aaron wrote:Annoucements and HoS!
Man wtf?
Those are just forums every mod has powers in. They're just deciding on where to place D.Turtle and I.
Did they tell you this or are you guessing?
Ah hah, it's in OT. Because nobody reads Announcements. Except Announcements says nothing about it anyway, so even if we did it wouldn't be too useful.
RogueIce wrote:Either way it seems like kind of a sloppy way to assign mods.
This opinion then kinda remains unchanged. They said Lagmonster is retiring but apparently haven't taken off his supermod powers yet.
I grant that maybe they don't consider it important, but they did take the time to give the green to Stofsk and D. Turtle before deciding on their forums, so... Maybe the Staff just works in mysterious ways...
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:36 am
by Stofsk
hmm well i was hoping that the archangel gabriel would appear in a pillar of fire to herald my appointment
but i guess you can't have everything
~
why does this bug you anyway
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:49 am
by starku
maybe the hilariously inept nature of it
i'm sure once the afterglow wears off you'll get your perspective back
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:55 am
by RogueIce
starku wrote:maybe the hilariously inept nature of it
Stark sums it up well.
I'm not really
bothered by it, so much as just left with a feeling of "WTF were they thinking?" and trying, vainly, to append some reason for the really, really odd way they went about this.
Well okay, I am sorta bothered at D. Turtle being a mod because I think he's a bit of an ass and Thanas-lite less the redeeming qualities (granted this is just out of what I've seen of him in N&P, but isn't N&P the "serious debate" forum anyway?). That particular promotion just seems out of left field. Was there some secret application process I missed?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:51 am
by starku
can you imagine any secret plan that would reduce the clown-car factor of the rubber stamping
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:07 am
by Flagg
I'm really trying to care. Yet I don't.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:09 pm
by adr-admin
hahah alyeska apparently thinks it's a serious thing to say "YOU HAVE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIM THAT A NEW COPYRIGHT LAW WON'T BE THE END OF THE WORLD"
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:24 pm
by Zod
adr wrote:hahah alyeska apparently thinks it's a serious thing to say "YOU HAVE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIM THAT A NEW COPYRIGHT LAW WON'T BE THE END OF THE WORLD"
I figure it means the US would be a lot more like China considering how indiscriminate some companies are with their takedown notices.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:33 pm
by Flagg
adr wrote:hahah alyeska apparently thinks it's a serious thing to say "YOU HAVE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIM THAT A NEW COPYRIGHT LAW WON'T BE THE END OF THE WORLD"
Throw not being able to prove a negative in that fuckers face and do the turnaround making him prove that it is.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:38 pm
by adr-admin
be aware that most negatives can be proven
though that'd prolly work in this case
thanas locked the original thread though (kinda proving my point about there being a shitload of sopa threads; they never had to do that about the terrible tyranny topics) so unless alyeska continues it in the new thread i'll let it drop
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:52 pm
by Veef
I don't think Painrack-kun understands anything that isn't written in a Battletech book
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:01 pm
by Phantasee
Stofsk wrote:I only have mod powers in a handful of forums so far, like Testing, HoS, Announcements etc.
So everything important, plus HoS and Announcements.
Good work infiltrating the command structure, Stofsk.
PS Since when is there a limit on # of quotes in can embed in a post over here? I am very upset, ADR.