New Testingstan

i've decided to make flagg the board's official unofficial guinea pig

Zod wrote:i've decided to make flagg the board's official unofficial guinea pig

I'm going to murder you.

Flagg wrote:

Zod wrote:i've decided to make flagg the board's official unofficial guinea pig

I'm going to murder you.

Promises promises.

just wait till the next admin shuffle

i'm sure he will have his revenge

adr wrote:hahah alyeska apparently thinks it's a serious thing to say "YOU HAVE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIM THAT A NEW COPYRIGHT LAW WON'T BE THE END OF THE WORLD"

there is no evidence the world won't end because of stricter copyright laws

gentlemen you may now freak the hell out

I must have missed the memo where overheated rhetoric is considered a perfectly adequate substitute for a cogent point.

well i'm in no position to talk about overheated rhetoric

what's funny is that the positive argument that the law will lead to the end of the world cannot actually be proven without assuming some really dubious premises

but the negative can be shown to be highly likely by induction, ie. no previous law has caused the end of the world, copyright has small effects on the environment, democracy existed before the internet, humanity survived the bronze age collapse etc. etc.

to be fair i don't think by "doomsday scenario" he literally meant the end of the world

but yeah

if it's not the end of the world as we know it, it's not exactly a doomsday scenario now is it

q

e

d

pwned

one could argue that anything changes the world as we know it, or at least a small part of it

one could argue that, but one would be a bit of a prick.

Flagg wrote:

adr wrote:hahah alyeska apparently thinks it's a serious thing to say "YOU HAVE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIM THAT A NEW COPYRIGHT LAW WON'T BE THE END OF THE WORLD"

Throw not being able to prove a negative in that fuckers face and do the turnaround making him prove that it is.

He would be better served to inform Alyeska that the burden of proof is on him to prove that this hilarious bill is doosmday incarnate.

Knubfuck wrote:

Flagg wrote:

adr wrote:hahah alyeska apparently thinks it's a serious thing to say "YOU HAVE TO BACK UP YOUR CLAIM THAT A NEW COPYRIGHT LAW WON'T BE THE END OF THE WORLD"

Throw not being able to prove a negative in that fuckers face and do the turnaround making him prove that it is.

He would be better served to inform Alyeska that the burden of proof is on him to prove that this hilarious bill is doosmday incarnate.

That's what I just said you illiterate.

starku wrote:can you imagine any secret plan that would reduce the clown-car factor of the rubber stamping

No. But people[/i] heartless jerks have told me I lack imagination. I was hoping for insight. Maybe Red has some kind of idea, I dunno.

PS: Welcome to the herd, Flagg. I knew you were just in denial this whole time.

RogueIce wrote:

starku wrote:can you imagine any secret plan that would reduce the clown-car factor of the rubber stamping

No. But people[/i] heartless jerks have told me I lack imagination. I was hoping for insight. Maybe Red has some kind of idea, I dunno.

PS: Welcome to the herd, Flagg. I knew you were just in denial this whole time.

Go fuck yourself.

Flagg wrote:

RogueIce wrote:

starku wrote:can you imagine any secret plan that would reduce the clown-car factor of the rubber stamping

No. But people[/i] heartless jerks have told me I lack imagination. I was hoping for insight. Maybe Red has some kind of idea, I dunno.

PS: Welcome to the herd, Flagg. I knew you were just in denial this whole time.

Go fuck yourself.

Look on the bright side. He could've give you a pony avatar on top of the title.

:mrgreen:

RogueIce wrote: Look on the bright side. He could've give you a pony avatar on top of the title.

:mrgreen:

I did. He changed it back. I may change it back again sooner or later. I haven' t figured out how to lock avatars yet.

Zod wrote:

RogueIce wrote: Look on the bright side. He could've give you a pony avatar on top of the title.

:mrgreen:

I did. He changed it back. I may change it back again sooner or later. I haven' t figured out how to lock avatars yet.

Hope I get a screenshot when you do.

Flagg wrote: That's what I just said you illiterate.

You CAN prove a negative. If I told someone that there are no apples in my refrigerator and I was asked to prove that, all I have to do is allow him to examine my refrigerator to see that none are present.

PS There are negative proofs in math.

all this green is starting to annoy me

adr wrote:all this green is starting to annoy me

Make it a nice soothing blue?

Knubfuck wrote:

Flagg wrote: That's what I just said you illiterate.

You CAN prove a negative. If I told someone that there are no apples in my refrigerator and I was asked to prove that, all I have to do is allow him to examine my refrigerator to see that none are present.

PS There are negative proofs in math.

the problem is most of the time people want negative proof of something that's unreasonable

Knubfuck wrote:

Flagg wrote: That's what I just said you illiterate.

You CAN prove a negative. If I told someone that there are no apples in my refrigerator and I was asked to prove that, all I have to do is allow him to examine my refrigerator to see that none are present.

PS There are negative proofs in math.

Shut up retard hand.

Zod wrote:the problem is most of the time people want negative proof of something that's unreasonable

Indeed. "Prove to me God doesn't exist!"

i warned em

also i dig the colour

maybe a bit redder y'know