New Testingstan

We have pencil beams. I know because of CLASSIFIED.

That should be Stuart's slogan: CLASSIFIED.

Here's choice quote:

"If you really want to go that way, contact me privately and we'll talk about it. Warning, before you do get in, you will be subject to a remarkably tight background check."

starku wrote:

Aaron wrote:I wonder if he was this much of a loon when he was doing the nuke stuff.

you mean when he was producing made-up numbers to support military decision-making :V

lol, yeah.

I love how Pezook totally dropped the fag-bomb and no one has done anything.

Do you think he deserves a ban or do you just want him to be? It can't be that you care about anyone being offended.

Darth Fanboy wrote:Do you think he deserves a ban or do you just want him to be? It can't be that you care about anyone being offended.

Just funny that anyone without a green name does it and they are insta-banned and Pezook does it and not a peep.

It's SDN, no matter what or when if you're part of the OBC it don't fucking matter. You know this as well as anyone.

Knubble tov wrote:"Warning, before you do get in, you will be subject to a remarkably tight background check."

There is a sodomy joke to be made here, but I am above such things.

I think context is pretty important too.

I assume we're talking about this:

Sniper in real life = OMG ULTIMATE WARRIOR BADASS

Sniper in any multiplayer game = OMG CAMPING FAG NOOB

I'm sure there is irony in there somewhere

Which is a lot different to, I don't know, calling one of the gay members a fag because they've proved you wrong.

It's not a word choice I would have made but I don't see why there should be any kind of shitfit since he wasn't trying to insult anyone in particular and was mocking the immaturity of online gamers who would infact say such things word for word.

semi-related note. Youtube letting people comment on their videos is proof that the general public does not always need a voice, same for news pages.

Sem-semi related note, called someone a stinky cunt the other day, my reasoning being that they smelled like an unwashed woman's gentialia, does that make me a misogynist or am I absolved because of the accuracy of my statement?

I think it was Stofsk that I said this to one night: "If there was a button I could press that would kill anyone who has commented on YouTube more than ten times, I would press that button over and over and over again."

To paraphrase:

"If there was a button I could press that would ban SLAcker, I would press that button over and over and over again."

weemadando wrote:I think it was Stofsk that I said this to one night: "If there was a button I could press that would kill anyone who has commented on YouTube more than ten times, I would press that button over and over and over again."

folks, working for centrelink does this to you

its pretty sad that americans are literally so mentally brokne

we live in a country where the punishment for committing a war crime is less harsh than exposing the same

man if i drove drunk i would get a harsher punishment than that

but its impossibel to apply law to battlefields

also if someone gives an order to kill people, HOW CAN YOU WORK OUT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

hwo los

it is IMPOSSIBLE !!!!!!

these are the same fuckwits who will ask where the good germans were

Yeah that was a pretty weak ass justification. How is it that every other Western country can maintain standards that don't violate the law but the Yanks can't?

I guess the secret is that they don't care.

starku wrote:but its impossibel to apply law to battlefields

also if someone gives an order to kill people, HOW CAN YOU WORK OUT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

hwo los

it is IMPOSSIBLE !!!!!!

but you can't tell if they're the enemy when you shoot at them, the enemy doesn't have uniforms!1!1

"How can you shoot women and children?"
"Easy! You just don't lead them as much!"

Aaron wrote:Yeah that was a pretty weak ass justification. How is it that every other Western country can maintain standards that don't violate the law but the Yanks can't?

I guess the secret is that they don't care.

it doesn't matter

because if someone mishandles evidence or something, its totally ok that the criminals get off scot free and nobody can complain

RIGHT

starku wrote:

Aaron wrote:Yeah that was a pretty weak ass justification. How is it that every other Western country can maintain standards that don't violate the law but the Yanks can't?

I guess the secret is that they don't care.

it doesn't matter

because if someone mishandles evidence or something, its totally ok that the criminals get off scot free and nobody can complain

RIGHT

well if you put the soldiers in jail you're obviously not supporting the troops

that makes you un-amurrican

you know what happens to un-amurrican people around here?

OFF with your head TO GITMO!

It's that, and also a "Yeah, we did, so whattaya think you're gonna do about it?" attitude. Like, "we dare you."

starku wrote:

Aaron wrote:Yeah that was a pretty weak ass justification. How is it that every other Western country can maintain standards that don't violate the law but the Yanks can't?

I guess the secret is that they don't care.

it doesn't matter

because if someone mishandles evidence or something, its totally ok that the criminals get off scot free and nobody can complain

RIGHT

LOL O.J joke!

Or maybe not.

Still funny to meh

its like that british extradition thing

us extradites whoever they want on any pretense to try people in their special courts

refuses ever to allow their dudes to be extradited to face foreign courts or crimes in other countries

but the terrorists hate your freedoms

starku wrote:its like that british extradition thing

us extradites whoever they want on any pretense to try people in their special courts

refuses ever to allow their dudes to be extradited to face foreign courts or crimes in other countries

but the terrorists hate your freedoms

british extradition thing?