New Testingstan

The fact that jub is whining about taking away people's rights because they might do something is just too much to pass up. I wasn't going to post in that thread but goddamn. The hypocrisy is just so blinding.

No. Thinking about them will soil my brain. I'm still trying to recover from the guy who ate the most cockroaches in a contest to win a snake...then died.

Count Chocula wrote:No. Thinking about them will soil my brain. I'm still trying to recover from the guy who ate the most cockroaches in a contest to win a snake...then died.

Only in Florida dude.


Maybe the Phillipines.

Miami thank God. Up here we eat alligators...then turn them into belts and boots.

They do that in Miami too. Probably more gators in one square mile there than in all of Hillsborough county.

Can't argue that. It's funny...Miami's just about 300 road miles from Tampa. Over in Europe, that would put you into a completely different culture, language and traditions.

Oh yeah...same applies here. Never mind.

Fucking Miami. Andrew missed goddamnit. HE MISSED!

Things Jub is for:
Killing Muslims
Gun Control
Treating Native Americans like shit even more

Things Jub is against:
Restrictions on Pedophiles giving out candy on Halloween.

Flagg wrote:Things Jub is for:
Killing Muslims
Gun Control
Treating Native Americans like shit even more

Things Jub is against:
Restrictions on Pedophiles giving out candy on Halloween.

Sounds like a Biden For President kinda guy.

Count Chocula wrote:

Flagg wrote:Things Jub is for:
Killing Muslims
Gun Control
Treating Native Americans like shit even more

Things Jub is against:
Restrictions on Pedophiles giving out candy on Halloween.

Sounds like a Biden For President kinda guy.

I don't think Biden is pro-pedoph- Wait, I see what you did there...

Look Flagg, I know you like to make light of things, but this election is about, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S, jobs.

This is SRS BZNZ. Ohio's the critical state this time around, and dammit there ain't no alligators in Akron.

I'm not so sure Ohio's really that critical depending on how well Obama pulls in elsewhere.

So, Cartman, and Zod I suppose, how exactly are you right and Jubbie wrong in that thread? Jub's an inconsistent idiot, but he's been consistent in that thread, and moreover, he appears to be right. And while it might be fun to jump on the 'hurhur Jub's an idiot' bandwagon, wouldn't dismissing his valid points in one thread because of his idiocy in another be considered...

... ad hominem?

Ohio is critical to Romney not Obama. Obama can easily win without Ohio, but Mitt can't win at all without Ohio.

Djinnkitty83 wrote:So, Cartman, and Zod I suppose, how exactly are you right and Jubbie wrong in that thread? Jub's an inconsistent idiot, but he's been consistent in that thread, and moreover, he appears to be right. And while it might be fun to jump on the 'hurhur Jub's an idiot' bandwagon, wouldn't dismissing his valid points in one thread because of his idiocy in another be considered...

... ad hominem?

Oh wait

You missed the obvious tie-in to Goodyear's famous Eagle "Gatorback" tires, which are still in production. You are a joke

Why you gotta be so mean? It's ma birfday!

Djinnkitty83 wrote:So, Cartman, and Zod I suppose, how exactly are you right and Jubbie wrong in that thread? Jub's an inconsistent idiot, but he's been consistent in that thread, and moreover, he appears to be right. And while it might be fun to jump on the 'hurhur Jub's an idiot' bandwagon, wouldn't dismissing his valid points in one thread because of his idiocy in another be considered...

... ad hominem?

Dude said that if there were more prostitutes, there wouldn't be any pedophiles, because the only reason people molest children is sexual frustration in Jubjubes' internal world. I think this categorically disqualifies him from rightness.

Djinnkitty83 wrote:So, Cartman, and Zod I suppose, how exactly are you right and Jubbie wrong in that thread? Jub's an inconsistent idiot, but he's been consistent in that thread, and moreover, he appears to be right. And while it might be fun to jump on the 'hurhur Jub's an idiot' bandwagon, wouldn't dismissing his valid points in one thread because of his idiocy in another be considered...

... ad hominem?

He's willing to dismiss gun ownership as a right for purely arbitrary personal reasons. So why is it suddenly so heinous to remove sex offenders ability to participate in Halloween? What's the difference if they both have the goal of protecting people?

Also, I'm pretty sure we ban pedophiles from the internet already, which makes jub's whining all the more hilariously ignorant.

Why the fuck isn't NAMBLA illegal? Oni, do you know?

Quackustra wrote:Dude said that if there were more prostitutes, there wouldn't be any pedophiles, because the only reason people molest children is sexual frustration in Jubjubes' internal world. I think this categorically disqualifies him from rightness.

And this is why I hate Jubs. I find myself agreeing with part of his position, but then he goes off the deep end and says something stupid like that.

But again, my point holds: Just because he's an idiot about prostitutes doesn't mean he's right that further making convicted sex-offenders (under the ridiculously inconsistent laws which define what is a 'sex offender') social pariahs doesn't help them with rehabilitation, is statistically proven to have little to no effect on child-molestation rates, and actually likely hurts the cause by publicly singling them out as visible scapegoats to make people think the problem's solved and drawing their attention away from the vast majority of sexual abuse cases that involved close friends and family of the victim.

...Not to mention that it's not just random-kiddie-fiddlers who get affected by this, but people who were caught urinating in public, 20 year olds caught dinking around with 17 year olds, and hypothetically, a minor caught taking nudie pics of themselves, as these are all people who can end up on those lists as well.

Y'know, shit that's been brought up in the first three pages of that thread, but that Cartman hasn't addressed in the slightest, despite them kind of wiping out his entire 'think of the children' hysteria. But hey, 'hur hur, stoopid fattie TEO nerds amirite'. Who cares if we're actually right or not, so long as we're over here making fun of them.

Oh and I can't believe I missed this gem in that thread:

Cartman, on page 2 wrote:Nice ad hominem motherfucker. Get the fuck out of the thread.

The irony, it burns.

Zod wrote:He's willing to dismiss gun ownership as a right for purely arbitrary personal reasons.

Which has nothing to do with the sex-offender thread, which means dismissing him in that thread for idiocy in the gun-control thread is, wait for it, an ad-hominem attack.

So why is it suddenly so heinous to remove sex offenders ability to participate in Halloween? What's the difference if they both have the goal of protecting people?

Well, plenty of others have helpfully pointed it out in that thread, but I'll summarize here: Because it doesn't fulfill that goal. Because it hits a shit-ton more people than the types who randomly grab and fiddle kids (who are actually a tiny percentage of pedophiles, once again pointed out in that thread), because it's trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist, because it feeds into a misplaced hysteria and draws attention away from the real problems, because it marks a lot of people on the inconsistent farce that is the sex-offender registry as social pariahs, fucking over whatever rehabilitation they made, and well over 90% of them didn't even get on there for being random-kiddie-fiddlers.

Is there anything I missed?

Djinnkitty83 wrote:
...Not to mention that it's not just random-kiddie-fiddlers who get affected by this, but people who were caught urinating in public, 20 year olds caught dinking around with 17 year olds, and hypothetically, a minor caught taking nudie pics of themselves, as these are all people who can end up on those lists as well.

Let me answer your point with a question. Do you believe violent felons should be allowed to buy guns?