Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:13 am
The funny thing is when smokers whine that they're being picked on. Oh boo hoo poor babies can't force everyone else to breathe your rancid shit.
"you said you'd ban me last" "i lied"
https://testingstan.arsdnet.net/forum/
It boils when you became a cynic due to your home environment over the last decade: the stepfather treats everyone like crap sans his biological son; treats your mother like property and uses the bible as justification and pitches shitfits when she visits with her family in another state; yells at you when you're mad; yells at you when you're happy; never congratulates you on anything; etc.starku wrote:I wonder where knubs gets his violent feelings
This'll end well.S.L.Acker wrote:Sorry but you must not get that the sort of loli which could actually be legal contains no little kids at all. It does contain drawn images that may depict kids. This isn't the same as child porn, for the very simple reason that it doesn't abuse anybody.Mr. Coffee wrote:Make all the lame excuses you want, they're still jerking off to images of little kids, Duckie. Don't give a fuck, that shit ain't right.
Also, this notion of sex between people of wildly different ages being wrong isn't some universal truth. Many ancient cultures had man/boy relationships that were considered normal. So you can't even argue that all sex between adults and children is abusive, though given modern beliefs any such contact today would cause harm if only because everybody will tell the child they have been harmed.
i'm really wondering whose sock puppet slacker isGands wrote:This'll end well.S.L.Acker wrote:Sorry but you must not get that the sort of loli which could actually be legal contains no little kids at all. It does contain drawn images that may depict kids. This isn't the same as child porn, for the very simple reason that it doesn't abuse anybody.Mr. Coffee wrote:Make all the lame excuses you want, they're still jerking off to images of little kids, Duckie. Don't give a fuck, that shit ain't right.
Also, this notion of sex between people of wildly different ages being wrong isn't some universal truth. Many ancient cultures had man/boy relationships that were considered normal. So you can't even argue that all sex between adults and children is abusive, though given modern beliefs any such contact today would cause harm if only because everybody will tell the child they have been harmed.
on the other hand if they're going to do it anyway, better that it's a drawing and not actual kiddy pornMr.Coffee wrote:Seriously guys, it's ok, it's not child porn cause it's a drawing, amirite.
To use the Furry as an example, it's ok because they're not actually trying to fuck animals. Yet we both know that the only difference between a Furry and a Dog Fucker is a bottle of tequila and a lifetime of regret.Zod wrote:on the other hand if they're going to do it anyway, better that it's a drawing and not actual kiddy pornMr.Coffee wrote:Seriously guys, it's ok, it's not child porn cause it's a drawing, amirite.
slacker's still a fuckwit for trying to justify being a pedophile though
*evolutionary psychology*Aaron wrote:Well it's kind of relevant if it's helping kill his mom.
What is it with you guys and shitheads for step-fathers, there's three on this board.