Page 202 of 488
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:35 am
by Darth Fanboy
Mr.Coffee wrote:Also, Fanboy's apparently my boyfriend now. I call big spoon!
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:35 am
by Questor
LOL
You see, this is when you can tell they're messed up. They're trying to take the attention by calling you gay. The irony of that is just hilarious.*
You know, it makes me wonder what would happen if you used your powers for good (or evil) instead of the lulz.
*(For anyone from TEO reading this, or just the humor challenged) The irony is that the christian right vilifies homosexuals by calling them child molesters and implying that one leads to the other. You could also throw in some Catholic irony, too.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:36 am
by Mr.Coffee
Loving the human sacrifice/slaver jab. Stay classy, DF!
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:37 am
by Darth Fanboy
Mr.Coffee wrote:Stay classy, DF!
NEVER!
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:39 am
by Mr.Coffee
You stay classy, gooddamn it, or I'll dress you in the gimp suit and lock you in the barrel again!
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:41 am
by Questor
Did Terriblename just make a square-rectangle mistake?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:43 am
by Mr.Coffee
He basically said long windedly that as long as you're not actually fucking kids that thinking about fucking kids is okie fine.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:45 am
by Questor
S.L.Acker wrote:Stofsk, being a mod doesn't mean you get a pass on actually arguing a point.
And the Slacker calls out a mod!
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:47 am
by Mr.Coffee
It's almost like they want to get banned but are to chickenshit to just come out and say it.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:49 am
by Zod
Except, rape is sex against one's consent, ie, that one is out of control of. So they're the same.
itt terralthra minces semantics
but just for fun let's see what webster has to say
Definition of CONSENT
intransitive verb
1
: to give assent or approval : agree <consent to being tested>
2
archaic : to be in concord in opinion or sentiment
— con·sent·er noun
— con·sent·ing·ly adverb
See consent defined for English-language learners »
See consent defined for kids
by gum i do believe you can consent to relinquishing control
is this why bdsm fetishists use safe words
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:55 am
by Darth Fanboy
Zod that avatar really enhances all of your posts, gotta say.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:56 am
by Darth Fanboy
I feel like I have gone above and beyond the call to get a moderator to look into that thread
(no offense Stofsk you are too cool to lump in with those guys)
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:00 am
by weemadando
I may have been reading it wrong, but did it really go down the "people fantasise about rape therefore rape is normal and ok" hole?
Because seriously, if that's your best defence against paedophilia arguments, you're going poorly.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:01 am
by Darth Fanboy
YOU GUYS
Pedobeario wrote:
Would you like to present your case for children being unable to consent?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:03 am
by Zod
INFORMED consent
no seriously
INFORMED consent
INFORMED is the key word when discussing consent
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:05 am
by Darth Fanboy
Do I seriously like, need to say everything in length like that? I guess so.
Like, if I don't say "informed consent" am I somehow implying that any child capable of saying the words "yes and no" can consent to sexual activity?
Good news for the Catholic Church I guess
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:05 am
by Questor
Oh... My... God...
We have unmasked a secret pedobear cult. I wonder exactly when this triggers my mandatory reporting requirements?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:06 am
by Oxymoron
weemadando wrote:"people fantasise about rape therefore rape is normal and ok"
"people fantasise about beating their wife/husband therefore conjugal violence is normal and ok"
"people fantasise about dominating others violently therefore being an asshole is normal and ok"
"people fantasise about murdering each other therefore murder is normal and ok"
God, I could continue like this
all day long.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:06 am
by Dooey Jo
oh wow, in like ten minutes the thread got both the "appeal to board rules" and "comparison to creationists" badges
there should be a TEO bingo or something
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:07 am
by Zod
Darth Fanboy wrote:Do I seriously like, need to say everything in length like that? I guess so.
Like, if I don't say "informed consent" am I somehow implying that any child capable of saying the words "yes and no" can consent to sexual activity?
Good news for the Catholic Church I guess
consider who you're dealing with in that thread
you might have to use smaller words
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:08 am
by Darth Fanboy
Dooey Jo wrote:oh wow, in like ten minutes the thread got both the "appeal to board rules" and "comparison to creationists" badges
there should be a TEO bingo or something
You don't know how bad I have felt like dropping "CONCESSION ACCEPTED" When Cesario and Slacker basically admitted pedophila is cool AS LONG AS YOU KEEP IT UPSTAIRS!
Should change my Av to Pedobear and then the location to "Hanging out with Cesario"
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:10 am
by Oxymoron
Darth Fanboy wrote:Should change my Av to Pedobear and then the location to "Hanging out with Cesario"
Yes. That would be quite the fun, indeed.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:13 am
by Mr.Coffee
Do it, send me the av and we'll bandwagon that son of a bitch.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:21 am
by Infinity Biscuit
weemadando wrote:I may have been reading it wrong, but did it really go down the "people fantasise about rape therefore rape is normal and ok" hole?
Because seriously, if that's your best defence against paedophilia arguments, you're going poorly.
You did read that wrong because the argument Terra's trying to make is "a lot of people fantasise about terrible things (like sexually assaulting adults or kids or elephants), so cut fantasy some slack if no one actually goes through with anything" which I think is fairly reasonable? I mean he's not saying that having those inclinations is a good thing.
That line of thought is left to Cesario and Slacker!
Best defense against pedophilia arguments is obviously "Ancient Greeks made shota manga"
(seriously I have trouble actually accepting that people would try to argue that sexually assaulting kids is a good thing help)
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:23 am
by Mr.Coffee
Actually, I think Slacker just topped Ancient Greece with his "why boner" concept.