Page 210 of 488
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:51 am
by Nietzslime
i ignored my russell readings tonight to watch Z with my brother and eat cheese so i don't give a fuck
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:12 am
by Darth Fanboy
Maybe you should tell me to "get lost"
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:29 am
by RogueIce
Darth Fanboy wrote:I effing love firefly threads just because I can bullshit all I want and it really doesn't matter because the best anyone can argue is "yeah it did shitty BUT..."
Whedon is the Lord Thy God and Savior. Why doest thou speakest against Him?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:36 am
by Darth Fanboy
Because at least half of the characters he creates are insufferable shitpickles?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:42 am
by RogueIce
Add this plz kthx
Darth Fanboy wrote:Because at least half of the characters he creates are insufferable shitpickles?
I do not dispute this. Nor can I really agree because TBH my expose to Whedon is some of early to (maybe) mid Buffy and early Angel. That's about it.
Buffy totally breaks my suspension of disbelief though. I mean seriously, it seemed like every week there would be some student (or teacher) getting killed on campus in a probably gruesome manner and under suspicious circumstances.
I mean I know the principal and mayor were in on some conspiracy or whatever, but seriously. Considering all the things parents routinely get up in arms over involving education, you'd think the
routine suspicious deaths of students and faculty on campus would be one of them.
Especially when IIRC during some parent night attack they decided to blame it on gangs. An attack where, you know,
people died. Seriously if that was their regular cover story that school would be locked down so tight the schools from
Dangerous Minds and those other 'gang high school' movies would look like fucking Club Med.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:50 am
by Zod
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:07 am
by uraniun235
ugh please do not implement any of these
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:08 am
by Zod
uraniun235 wrote:
ugh please do not implement any of these
not even
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:11 am
by uraniun235
not even
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:56 am
by xon
Darth Fanboy wrote:Because at least half of the characters he creates are insufferable shitpickles?
Wow, that's generous.
I also find it really hard to maintain suspension of disbelief with the amazingly shit worldbuilding.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:01 pm
by Dooey Jo
is this part where i ask if this is a part of a film cliché?
omg double meta
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:32 pm
by Veef
anyone want to discuss why the comics industry is stupid
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:36 pm
by starku
because they don't rehash enought 25 year old ideas thats why
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:42 pm
by Veef
the most disposable medium in America is the least disposable type of entertainment
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:45 pm
by starku
imagine the terms 'comic book' and 'super hero' were inseparable in the public mind and proceed on that basis
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:21 pm
by Veef
it didn't used to be that way
i guess manga has the advantage of having the same word in a different language
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:38 pm
by Dooey Jo
i think you need to start calling them what they are
americomi
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:39 pm
by Veef
no the common tag on image sites is AMEKOMI
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:43 pm
by Dooey Jo
lies
ps i love how that teo thread is the first hit when you google "americomi"
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:56 pm
by RogueIce
Dooey Jo wrote:lies
ps i love how that teo thread is the first hit when you google "americomi"
What thread?
FYI I Googled it and TEO wasn't near the first hit, though it was on the first page. The link was for a SFDebris review thread that apparently mentioned the word in it.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:09 pm
by Dooey Jo
maybe you are doing it wrong (or maybe google has FILES ON US and tampers with our searches!)
oh awesome, apparently you can't just copy links from google
anyway here it is
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... 8&t=124692
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:50 pm
by adr-admin
Dooey Jo wrote:(or maybe google has FILES ON US and tampers with our searches!)
confirmed
seriously
oh awesome, apparently you can't just copy links from google
i love how slimy those assholes are
facebook too
you hover it and the url looks reasonable
but when you click, their script changes it so they can track you
(and slow down your net experience with a middleman)
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:50 pm
by adr-admin
uraniun235 wrote:not even
but i liek teh trollface
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:51 pm
by adr-admin
d/l'd some
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:56 pm
by Aaron
I knew it would be sidewanker.