Page 23 of 45

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:45 pm
by Aaron
Oh! Saluting while holding a rifle? I don't even remember how we did it. I think I've done it once.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:51 pm
by The Spartan
That why I gave you a picture. :prof:

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:47 pm
by Bounty
I may have been thinking about ships.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:24 pm
by Aaron
Oh man, what the fuck?

A friends 17 year old daughter is pregnant, three months. She used to babysit for us and always wanted to go to Veterinary school.

That's pretty much gone now. I hope she doesn't end up in poverty for years.

Fuck.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:13 pm
by timmy
What she needs to do is make the father work night shift so that he can bring in family income while being available during the day to care for the child, freeing her up to go to ventinary school.

He will not mind this sacrifice of sleep and sanity provided she actually goes on to become a vet afterward and doesn't just get locked into a perpetual cycle of tertiary study.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:17 pm
by Aaron
I sense bitterness.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:17 pm
by Oxymoron
Or... what about calling for external help ? How's government help for "baby-sitters" and nurseries ?

Does she live far from her family ?

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:26 pm
by Aaron
Poor. Though subsidized care does exist, I have no idea if universities have child care.

Family wise her mom is here, though we are an hour from Ottawa and 6 hours from the only uni in ontario that offers the course.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:31 pm
by Oxymoron
The price of living in such a huge country, I suppose.

A shame. For once family could have had a use, however minimal it could have been.


There could be community solutions - families organizing things betweens themselves to do shifts guarding each other's kids.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 10:59 pm
by timmy
Aaron wrote:I sense bitterness.
You sense well.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:28 am
by Darksi4190
Ugh. I'm starting to wonder if getting off this Effexor shit is actually going to kill me. Over the past week i've experienced nausea, a little vomiting, disorientation, night sweats, inability to sleep, and an occasional sharp pain in my head like someone is jamming a needle into my brain.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:26 am
by Darksi4190
Christ. Now i've started getting chills too. And my entire body is getting the "pins and needles" feeling like i'm not getting enough blood to my extremities. I hope this doesn't get any worst.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:21 am
by Gands
I've been there dude.

Just hang in there. It will improve, and so shall you.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:39 am
by Aaron
Just stick with it, it took a couple weeks after weaning off totally for the withdrawal to end.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:37 pm
by Oxymoron
Fuck C's pointers and fuck anyone who shipped us an application that coredump when it receive an expected and conform input.

I am not a C programmer I shouldn't have to debug such a trainwreck...

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
by Oxymoron
Also, fuck people for still using ipv4 and considering it standard.

It makes working on ipv6-dependent code more painful than it should.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
by Oxymoron
Fuck everything.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:02 pm
by RyanThunder
needs a like button

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:46 pm
by Oxymoron
You know what I like ?

functions which return the wrong type of data (Int instead of Char)

even when the source code of said function, once examined, show it shouldn't be happening. Ever.



Also, god damn is printf a finicky little bitch.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:30 pm
by adr
hahaha now you C why D rox

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:41 pm
by Oxymoron
At least now I know the code's algorithm isn't at fault, it's just some black magic at work somewhere in the spaghetti mess of GCC's libraries.

I won't have to ask myself existential questions when translating said algorithm into Python :science:

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:05 pm
by Dooey Jo
in c, if the return type of a function isn't specified it will default to int

and if it doesn't have a return statement, whatever's in eax when the function ends may pretend to be the return value on x86 architectures

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:09 pm
by adr
iirc int and char are implicitly convertable both ways in C too. and arithmetic may cause the char to be promoted to an int. C's rules can be fairly surprising even when you know them.

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:15 pm
by Oxymoron
what I know is that printf REALLY didn't like to be presented a %d when it was expecting a %s

by the way, the function at fault was/is inet_ntop

Re: Lament 2: Cry Harder

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:23 pm
by Dooey Jo
if you turn the warning level on gcc to -Wall (or use -Wformat) it will warn about such type errors in printf-like functions :engleft: