New Testingstan

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:49 pm**

adr wrote:red is the green name corrupting you

?

After all these years complaining about shitposters on SDN, I can finally do something about it.

I'm trying to be fair. I think Simon_Jester made an abominable argument in the abortion thread, but I know Simon_Jester is trying so I went easy on him. Baffalo, on the other hand...

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:49 pm**

man them white supremacists are mean

imma use my japanese laser sword

vrooosh!

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:55 pm**

RedImperator wrote:Baffalo, on the other hand...

oh yeah i lol'd

speaking of which i think microsoft actualyl does make money of win 3.1 still, believe it or not

extended service contracts

another thing is you can get it i think through msdn

one guy i worked with cited that as something he liked about the msdn subscription

nostalgia

though he surely would have still bought it regardless

but meh i don't think he knows even the first thing about copyright

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:08 pm**

oh simon_jester

tbh i'm ok with him

i think he's wrong a lot, but i think he's willing to actually discuss things too

it is ok to be wrong and/or ignorant if you're willing to talk about it

it is being sincerely arrogant that annoys me. that's the #1 reason why i dislike alyrium so much. even when he's right... he's such an ass about it

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:12 pm**

so barack obama = gul dukat

the hammer said this:

Recognition of the fact that a President has to make tough decisions, often times balancing the lesser of two evils, is simply acceptance of reality. I happen to believe that there is a good reason for the Presidents actions because the alternative would be to believe that he is breaking his campaign promise for comic book super villain reasons. It would also be ignoring the fact that Obama has taken steps towards improving prisoner treament and closing the facility. Dealing with Gitmo is an extremely complicated situation, so excuse me if I cut the President a little slack and grant him a little patience in getting the job done.

you remember that episode "waltz" of ds9

sisko and dukat are crashed on some moon together

dukat is losing his mind too

but they two of them talk about the bajoran occupation

and dukat was like "i had to do it it was the will of the central command" and "i improved the conditions for the workers"

sry i just love star trek

a lot

sue me

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:02 pm**

Well shit I guess when Bush did all those awful human rights violations he had really good reasons too.

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:10 pm**

adr wrote:oh simon_jester

tbh i'm ok with him

i think he's wrong a lot, but i think he's willing to actually discuss things too

it is ok to be wrong and/or ignorant if you're willing to talk about it

it is being sincerely arrogant that annoys me. that's the #1 reason why i dislike alyrium so much. even when he's right... he's such an ass about it

Simon Jester is Broomstick's understudy in case she ever goes away and the board is without the "obligatory parroting dipshit nothing to contribute except words someone else just said" motherfucker.

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:25 pm**

simon is like a parrot who simply repeats everything someone else just said and contributes nothing to a thread, he's training up to replace broomstick if she ever disappears

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:14 pm**

ADR is passive who knew

Red i don't even know what to say to baffalo.... He is so wrong he can't even understand what anyone is talking about

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:42 pm**

I'd like to know how much stuff he pirates that he couldn't otherwise get vs. How much he pirated because he wanted free shit.

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:51 pm**

starku wrote:ADR is passive who knew

Red i don't even know what to say to baffalo.... He is so wrong he can't even understand what anyone is talking about

Occasionally I will be debating someone and he'll make a reply so off-the-wall wrong that I assume I must have missed something somewhere, and it takes me a while to get any mental traction for my reply. I imagine this is what routinely debating Baffalo is like.

I dunno guys I'm starting to think it might be possible to firehose N&P into semi-respectability. Probably just setting myself up for disappointment.

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:53 pm**

starku wrote:ADR is passive who knew

you've heard of alpha-males right

introducing the OMEGA MALE

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:58 pm**

Darth Fanboy wrote:I'd like to know how much stuff he pirates that he couldn't otherwise get vs. How much he pirated because he wanted free shit.

what if we only pirate the shit out of one type of thing but buy everything else?

(well okay two types of things, but not one type of thing as much anymore)

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:04 pm**

adr wrote:
starku wrote:ADR is passive who knew
you've heard of alpha-males right

introducing the OMEGA MALE

I saw that movie
He had a lot of guns

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:21 pm**

Darth Fanboy wrote:Simon Jester is Broomstick's understudy in case she ever goes away and the board is without the "obligatory parroting dipshit nothing to contribute except words someone else just said" motherfucker.

wait what? i don't like broomstick, but repeating what other people have said is not her shtick

actually i don't know what her shtick is these days because her posts make my eyes glaze over

but i know from scrolling past her posts that she'll often post more than everyone else in the thread before her, combined, so if she's just parroting she's finding a way to lengthen what everyone else has said

i think her problem is being tl;dr about stuff no1curr about, and using a vaguely sanctimonious, lecturing tone. she's sort of like alyrium but more long-winded and less angry and aggressive

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:23 pm**

Metatwaddle wrote:
Darth Fanboy wrote:Simon Jester is Broomstick's understudy in case she ever goes away and the board is without the "obligatory parroting dipshit nothing to contribute except words someone else just said" motherfucker.
wait what? i don't like broomstick, but repeating what other people have said is not her shtick

actually i don't know what her shtick is these days because her posts make my eyes glaze over

but i know from scrolling past her posts that she'll often post more than everyone else in the thread before her, combined, so if she's just parroting she's finding a way to lengthen what everyone else has said

sometimes that's exactly what she does

while pretending that what she said was completely original and not at all addressed by someone else earlier

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:25 pm**

my policy of not reading her posts is clearly paying off

i've harbored a grudge for her because i was in an abortion thread where she tried to wave around her first-wave feminist street cred and used gendered insults at me (cunt, etc.) in the same post

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:27 pm**

Metatwaddle wrote:
Darth Fanboy wrote:Simon Jester is Broomstick's understudy in case she ever goes away and the board is without the "obligatory parroting dipshit nothing to contribute except words someone else just said" motherfucker.
wait what? i don't like broomstick, but repeating what other people have said is not her shtick

actually i don't know what her shtick is these days because her posts make my eyes glaze over

but i know from scrolling past her posts that she'll often post more than everyone else in the thread before her, combined, so if she's just parroting she's finding a way to lengthen what everyone else has said

i think her problem is being tl;dr about stuff no1curr about, and using a vaguely sanctimonious, lecturing tone. she's sort of like alyrium but more long-winded and less angry and aggressive

She reminds me of a mom lecturing a teen, but the kid stopped listening.

Sorry, first wave feminism?

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:29 pm**

Is both
Shell come into a thread and lecture people on how knowledgable she is
Even if she isn't and she is just repeating what other people say

Frankly her need for validation in this way is painful to see

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:29 pm**

Metatwaddle wrote:my policy of not reading her posts is clearly paying off

i've harbored a long-standing dislike for her because i was in an abortion thread where she tried to wave around her first-wave feminist street cred and used gendered insults at me (cunt, etc.) in the same post

i've harbored a long standing dislike for her when she dismissed howedar in a NASA thread because he only had a BA in his field

and then she backed down once mike started saying the same thing everyone else was already saying

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:31 pm**

Don't make me bring up her claiming I wanted to torture her to death because I offered to run a guy through guild wars

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:32 pm**

starku wrote:Don't make me bring up her claiming I wanted to torture her to death because I offered to run a guy through guild wars

she said she didn't have to present evidence in a thread about file sharing once

that was an lol

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:33 pm**

Well, its not hard to see why. Honestly I have a long standing policy of not arguing with mods, it just makes things difficult and interferes with my laid back nature.

Wtf? She said that dan?

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:34 pm**

Aaron wrote:
Metatwaddle wrote:
Darth Fanboy wrote:Simon Jester is Broomstick's understudy in case she ever goes away and the board is without the "obligatory parroting dipshit nothing to contribute except words someone else just said" motherfucker.
wait what? i don't like broomstick, but repeating what other people have said is not her shtick

actually i don't know what her shtick is these days because her posts make my eyes glaze over

but i know from scrolling past her posts that she'll often post more than everyone else in the thread before her, combined, so if she's just parroting she's finding a way to lengthen what everyone else has said

i think her problem is being tl;dr about stuff no1curr about, and using a vaguely sanctimonious, lecturing tone. she's sort of like alyrium but more long-winded and less angry and aggressive
She reminds me of a mom lecturing a teen, but the kid stopped listening.

Sorry, first wave feminism?

hmm scratch that, that'd be second wave. she said she'd been going to pro-choice rallies before roe v. wade, that sort of thing

i always thought first wave feminism was like betty friedan but wiki says it's actually more mary wollstonecraft and susan b. anthony

and the 60s/70s were second wave

Posted: **Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:37 pm**

I have no idea who those people are, to wikipedia!

New Testingstan

Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN

Re: Godammed SDN