Page 228 of 488
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:46 am
by Questor
I meant a special one for Flagg and Bakustra.
so they can coordinate better, like they usually do.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:52 am
by Nietzslime
Chadz wrote:Is YB having a seizure?
pretty sure all his posting since 2004 is one long cluster of strokes
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:43 am
by adr-admin
Struck the prohibition on using the report button to flag debate rule violations. Just to make the policy clear: you can use the report button on posts where another member is flagrantly violating the debating rules. Do not abuse this function. The staff will generally give users the benefit of the doubt in marginal cases, but using the report button trivially may result in disciplinary action.
omg i betcha comedy will eventually come from this
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:44 am
by adr-admin
err assuming anyone actually reads the announcements LOL
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:47 am
by Aaron
Why do i get the feeling in that uk council thread that you can't be a proper athiest without condeming all religious stuff as loud as you can.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:56 am
by Zod
Are you going to sit here and say that Windows 3.1's source code should be locked in a vault for the rest of eternity just because Microsoft owns it?
baffalo sets the bar for stupid pro-piracy arguments
fucking christ
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:58 am
by starku
I'm starting to see why people call them 'freetards'
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:08 am
by Flagg
I can't make out what his argument even is beyond "It's old".
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:23 am
by Aaron
Does copyright and stuff not expire after a certain number of years?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:32 am
by Zod
Aaron wrote:Does copyright and stuff not expire after a certain number of years?
The current lifespan of copyright right now is effectively "as long as the owner's alive and then some".
the stupid part of baffalo's argument is that he's claiming if someone owns something it should be made available to the public just because they're not using it anymore
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:37 am
by Aaron
I must have been thinking of patents.
But I'm starting to understand the "freetard" label.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:36 pm
by Dooey Jo
man it would be pretty sweet if the source code of old games and shit was available freely
but i hear google thinks it's awesome when people use their trademark as a casual verb, so that eventually anyone can set up their own "googling" service
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:16 pm
by Dooey Jo
basically what it boils down to is that things must change somehow so that rich people should be allowed free access to entertainment
but not change so much that poor people should be allowed free access to food
i wonder who will produce the entertainment as profit margins drop
(ps it will be the poor people)
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:54 pm
by Mr.Coffee
Oh fuck... Shep is trolling the Terminal Lance forums over the Marine Sniper's using the SS logo thing. NukeBoy vs Jarheads. Should be entertaining depending on how far Shep takes it.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 1:59 pm
by Oxymoron
A single disabled postman against a bunch of veteran marines ? Sounds like an even fight...
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:04 pm
by Veef
is iron mang resistant to 20mm cannon rounds
nobody cares, batmang

Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:58 pm
by Veef
did the mexihav not ready anything i wrote in the lightsabre thread and claim all i is have nostalgia
i can't understand his post
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:23 pm
by Civil War Man
A ship is being named after Gabrielle Giffords.
OMG NAVY IS RUINED FOREVER
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:47 pm
by adr-admin
i'm used to seeing 'freetard' in open source contexts where it is less about copyright and more about shit
but yeah on this perception of harm thing i can see how it can be bad
but someday i hope to see hte opportunity to throw it back at them
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:57 pm
by adr-admin
If public prayer is such a minor issue, then I'm sure the religious people would not be too upset over losing it. If they do, then that puts the lie to the idea that it's a minor issue.
but different people have different perceptions of what is minor
omg
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:00 pm
by adr-admin
when i was young and my heart was an open book
i used to say "live and let live"
you know i did
you know i did
you know i did
but in this ever changing world in which i'm livn'
.... actually i kinda still say it
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:01 pm
by adr-admin
LIVE AND LET DIE
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
by Aaron
Mr.Coffee wrote:Oh fuck... Shep is trolling the Terminal Lance forums over the Marine Sniper's using the SS logo thing. NukeBoy vs Jarheads. Should be entertaining depending on how far Shep takes it.
I wish he would just fuck off and stop polluting the board.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:40 pm
by Losonti Tokash
what is occurring
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:49 pm
by Aaron