New Testingstan

ugh the fucking child BABY just pooped his pants

so he's been peeing on the toilet

and i axed him if he gottas poop there too

he says no

i say try anyway

he sits there for a bit but insists no need

so i let him up




he goes to the kitchen


and promptly poops his pants




my god

ps i talk about the babies a lot

they friend's children

three of htem ages 7 (yeah teen mom deal with it), 3, and 2



i babysit them most days and have for like ever

Yeah, this struggle has been ongoing for a while. I imagine the SC will slap it down if someone brings a case.

Aaron wrote:Are coffee and I seriously the oldest ones here?

39 on sunday

adr wrote:i'm 25

born in late 1986


but i'm so set in my ways already that i prolly come across as some cranky geezer!

I was born in late 1986! I'm also 25!

IMPOSSIBLE

It's more 'I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP' or 'amazingly narrowminded' than old actuslly

Zod wrote:Welcome to America, Canuckians.

It's the Stephen Conroy approach.
"We need to block the internet and filter everything that people do?"
"But why? Don't you realise the limitations of the technology and the infrastructure costs involved?"
"PAEDOPHILE! YOU JUST WANT YOUR CHILD PORN!"

Worked for the labour party
They even had people believing it for years

Who is Dread Not, and why hasn't he been banned?

Questor wrote:Don't they know that the Internet Entertainment Media is a HUMAN RIGHT!!!!!!1!11!!

ftfy

But seriously, that PirateBay thread is dumb.

Darth Nostril wrote:

Aaron wrote:Are coffee and I seriously the oldest ones here?

39 on sunday

Thank fuck, I'm not the oldest guy here then.

Still in the top five though.

starku wrote:It's more 'I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP' or 'amazingly narrowminded' than old actuslly

y u so hurtful

weemadando wrote:

Zod wrote:Welcome to America, Canuckians.

It's the Stephen Conroy approach.
"We need to block the internet and filter everything that people do?"
"But why? Don't you realise the limitations of the technology and the infrastructure costs involved?"
"PAEDOPHILE! YOU JUST WANT YOUR CHILD PORN!"

I was thinking more like "Gee this would never be abused by unscrupulous officials looking for personal gain to intimidate opponents."

NEVER

Zod wrote:

I was thinking more like "Gee this would never be abused by unscrupulous officials looking for personal gain to intimidate opponents."

Completely unsurprisingly such events have occurred even with Australia's current Internet blacklist.

"Why is this abortion information/euthanasia lobby site on the blacklist?"
"Decisions made are secret and non-appealable because you aren't meant to know the decision has been made."

Crazedwraith wrote:This facebook thread is hilarious. "shooting things is not a violent action" Classic.

I find it hard to tell sometimes Fanboy, adr, whether you're arguing against these things because you actually believe it's not true or just because SDN people said it.

A little of column A a little of column B. Anything to break up the fucking bandwagoning one sided circle jerks that turned the place into a festering pile of shit with small snippets of interesting scattered about.

Most threads on SDN:

"OMG look at my liberal outraeg!"

"I agree!"

"ME TOO!"

"Hey guys I clearly don't understand what's going on but ME TOO!"

"Bad people are bad! I am in your club too!"

"OH NOOOOooooooooo a bad person/thing/event?!?!?!"

Certainly. Though we seem to lack the constant drive to fuck our own populace up the ass.

Still, pretty sad tbat the CPC has only one thing I agree with.

And no I don't think that shooting the laptop was violent towards the girl, violent towards the laptop? Well I guess but its not like you can intimidate something that...isn't alive.

Whitney Houston for example.

Crazedwraith wrote:I find it hard to tell sometimes Fanboy, adr, whether you're arguing against these things because you actually believe it's not true or just because SDN people said it.

how dare you insinuate that there's any trolls on the internet

Darth Fanboy wrote:A little of column A a little of column B.

Me too!!

the deliciousness of grapes is proof that there is a god

Darth Fanboy wrote:And no I don't think that shooting the laptop was violent towards the girl, violent towards the laptop? Well I guess but its not like you can intimidate something that...isn't alive.

Whitney Houston for example.

And you don't think there's going to be a difference in the impact to the kid between 'take away the laptop' and 'violently blast the laptop to shit'? Yes, the end result, not having a laptop is the same but it doesn't mean the impact of the kid is the same in both cases.

The impression I got from that video? They're both assholes, being over emotional and over reacting to things. The difference between them being one of them is a teenager (and really that 'i'm not your slave' shtich really is the teenage cliche) and one of them is the supposedly mature responsible adult.

Take away the laptop sure. Permantly if it is, as the video's suggested a repeated offense.

I won't even pretend to be a gun person. But isn't just blasting away in your lawn a bit of reckless thing to do?


eta

adr wrote:
how dare you insinuate that there's any trolls on the internet

im sorry i dont know what came over me

you realise trolling is actually a bad thing rite