Godammed SDN

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger.
Message
Author
User avatar
uraniun235
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:54 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6201 Post by uraniun235 »


Zablorg
Baron of the Burrito
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 2:06 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6202 Post by Zablorg »

Civil War Man wrote:
adr wrote:
But D13 is also quite stubbornly arguing that you need something called "free will" in order to have morality.
Is that guy claiming it's possible to have morality when all of your thoughts and actions have been predetermined? :wtf:
look i'm pretty sure determinism is totally real

(even if our actions are not predetermined then they are determined by raw chance and that's not much better when you think about it)

but it's only worth considering in a really meta sense

throwing your hands up and saying "I AM NOT A FREE AGENT" isn't productive towards anything anyone actually cares about

Dooey Jo
Posts: 568
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:35 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6203 Post by Dooey Jo »

"free will" can be taken to mean that you have a choice you can reason about, even though what you ultimately choose may be predetermined or predictable. it can also be taken to mean other things, but even then it's not like you can just declare discussions about physicalism and causality to be settled.

but in light of such uncertainties, perhaps it would be more fruitful to discuss why free will is important to the discussion. of course, if there is no choice, then discussing what the "right" choice is, is pointless. you can't say 1+1 "should" be 5, after all. but maybe you can come up with a definition of choice which is consistent with whatever view of reality you ascribe to, even if "free will" may not be
Civil War Man wrote:Stock market crashes
No sign of debris
Assume vaporization
200 gigaton stock market crash.

Enough to kill Star Trek ten times over :smug:
DracuLax - when even Death can't scare the shit out of you

Aaron
El Duderino
Posts: 2833
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:07 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6204 Post by Aaron »

uraniun235 wrote:http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... 2&t=153797

lol baffalo strikes again
That made me cringe.

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6205 Post by adr-admin »

free will is one of those things i see as super abstract

whether there's some physical gizmo that BOOM FREE WILL CAN BE FOUND HERE ON THE MRI

i don't really care

the concept w0rx

User avatar
Civil War Man
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:36 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6206 Post by Civil War Man »

I usually stay away from SLAM, but while checking out the clusterfuck in the secular morality thread, I saw one about the double standard between what constitutes militant atheism and militant theism. And I realized that a lot of first world Dawkins-like atheists have a pretty massive persecution complex going on.

I mean, since atheism isn't any form of belief system or anything like that, it's pretty hard to actually be persecuted on a systemic level outside of banning anything that isn't explicitly religiously affiliated. No one is trying to block the construction of a secular community center by claiming it's trying to impose some vague atheist law on the country. No one is trying to pass a constitutional amendment denying atheists the right to marry.

But oh no a poll says a lot of people don't trust atheists. :duchess:

Just as a disclaimer, I'm not denying that there's persecution of some atheists on a personal level in this country, but it is not nearly as systemic, and almost never as bad, as the shit muslims and gays have to put up with.

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6207 Post by Zod »

Civil War Man wrote:I usually stay away from SLAM, but while checking out the clusterfuck in the secular morality thread, I saw one about the double standard between what constitutes militant atheism and militant theism. And I realized that a lot of first world Dawkins-like atheists have a pretty massive persecution complex going on.

I mean, since atheism isn't any form of belief system or anything like that, it's pretty hard to actually be persecuted on a systemic level outside of banning anything that isn't explicitly religiously affiliated. No one is trying to block the construction of a secular community center by claiming it's trying to impose some vague atheist law on the country. No one is trying to pass a constitutional amendment denying atheists the right to marry.

But oh no a poll says a lot of people don't trust atheists. :duchess:

Just as a disclaimer, I'm not denying that there's persecution of some atheists on a personal level in this country, but it is not nearly as systemic, and almost never as bad, as the shit muslims and gays have to put up with.
Try talking about atheism on any kind of news site's discussion section. The amount of vitriol and ignorance towards atheists is hilariously sad.
Image

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6208 Post by Oxymoron »

I've heard things about a supposed "American Victimization Culture" (the "Help, I'm being oppressed" syndrome), a thing in the American culture that supposedly push everyone to try to, by default, portrait themselves as victims, for whatever reasons (maybe the idea that if you are a victim then you can't be the one committing something wrong ?).


Can it come from something like this ?
No.

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6209 Post by Zod »

Oxymoron wrote:I've heard things about a supposed "American Victimization Complex", a thing in the American culture that supposedly push everyone to try to, by default, portrait themselves as victims, for whatever reasons (maybe the idea that if you are a victim then you can't be the one committing something wrong ?).

Can it come from something like this ?
I think Christianity can take the blame here.
Matthew 5:10-12 (NKJV) Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, For theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Image

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6210 Post by Oxymoron »

I see. And I suppose the Civil Rights issues, and then the whole crop of activist movements that that came after (abortion, gay rights, etc...) took up on it.
No.

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6211 Post by Zod »

Oxymoron wrote:I see. And I suppose the Civil Rights issues, and then the whole crop of activist movements that that came after (abortion, gay rights, etc...) took up on it.
Take a look at the latest birth control healthcare fiasco with the Catholic shitheads.

They're claiming it's their "Rosa Parks" moment and that their beliefs are being attacked.
Image

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6212 Post by adr-admin »

one time i saw some people praying in front of me

so i shot and killed them for infringing upon my freedom from religion

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6213 Post by adr-admin »

get your strawmanning ass out of this thread adr

this is your final warning

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6214 Post by Oxymoron »

adr wrote:get your strawmanning ass out of this thread adr

this is your final warning
"Strawman"
"Red Herring"
"Burden Of Proof"
...

Is there a TVTropes for debating ? Cuz' I've always got the impression that if one exist, these people come from it.
No.

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6215 Post by adr-admin »

omg omg omg omg omg omg

that's a brilliant idea

User avatar
Civil War Man
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:36 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6216 Post by Civil War Man »

Zod wrote:
Oxymoron wrote:I see. And I suppose the Civil Rights issues, and then the whole crop of activist movements that that came after (abortion, gay rights, etc...) took up on it.
Take a look at the latest birth control healthcare fiasco with the Catholic shitheads.

They're claiming it's their "Rosa Parks" moment and that their beliefs are being attacked.
On the birth control issue, it's pretty hilarious how Fox news had an all-male panel to discuss birth control, and that congress had a hearing on birth control where all of the people testifying were men.

Anyway, the thing that really drove home the persecution complex thing was how they have this thread about how atheists are portrayed as militant for admitting they even exist and how it's so unfair right next to a thread where deedub banned a guy for questioning his views on morality. Made even more hilarious because the "you are banned" post descended straight into paranoid conspiracy theory delusion by accusing Legault of being a secret Christian fundamentalist who was pretending to be an atheist in order to destroy the atheists on an internet message board.

Dooey Jo
Posts: 568
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:35 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6217 Post by Dooey Jo »

teh christians are sending sleeper agents to question our logics!!
DracuLax - when even Death can't scare the shit out of you

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6218 Post by Oxymoron »

Civil War Man wrote:Made even more hilarious because the "you are banned" post descended straight into paranoid conspiracy theory delusion by accusing Legault of being a secret Christian fundamentalist who was pretending to be an atheist in order to destroy the atheists on an internet message board.
If you think that your "beliefs" can be so easily challenged, maybe you should seriously consider putting them into question yourself, don't'cha think ? :smug:
No.

Dooey Jo
Posts: 568
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:35 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6219 Post by Dooey Jo »

the most intellectually honest thing is to ban all dissent :poop:
DracuLax - when even Death can't scare the shit out of you

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6220 Post by Oxymoron »

I propose a Versus debate :

SDN Vs. HPCA

What happen ? :fukyu:
No.

User avatar
starku
UNPROVOKED CYNICISM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6221 Post by starku »

adr wrote:one time i saw some people praying in front of me

so i shot and killed them for infringing upon my freedom from religion
Near where I got married in my secular atheist civil union there were some Muslim women wearing headscarves

Of course I called the police

User avatar
uraniun235
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:54 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#6222 Post by uraniun235 »

guess who wrote:This also begs the question of whether our modern humanitarian society, by being so reluctant to use execution or forced sterilization upon even the most heinous of criminals, is inadvertently encouraging the cancer-like growth of sociopathic behaviour in our population. If sociopathic behaviour is a genetic trait (and there is increasingly disturbing evidence that it is), then it would make sense to try to eliminate its growth in our gene pool.

User avatar
Bakustra
Religious Fifth Columnist Who Hates Science, Especially Evolution
Posts: 1216
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:32 pm
Location: Wherever I go, there are nothing but punks like you.

Re: Godammed SDN

#6223 Post by Bakustra »

man, i love that darkwing duck is an eugenicist too

he really is a winner, isn't he?

User avatar
Bakustra
Religious Fifth Columnist Who Hates Science, Especially Evolution
Posts: 1216
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:32 pm
Location: Wherever I go, there are nothing but punks like you.

Re: Godammed SDN

#6224 Post by Bakustra »

Oxymoron wrote:I propose a Versus debate :

SDN Vs. HPCA

What happen ? :fukyu:
on the last incarnation of this board i described tropers vs. slade fanboys as a cage match between ground sloths

im not sure what this is in comparison- possibly a boxing match between weasels

User avatar
starku
UNPROVOKED CYNICISM
Posts: 2043
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#6225 Post by starku »

uraniun235 wrote:
guess who wrote:This also begs the question of whether our modern humanitarian society, by being so reluctant to use execution or forced sterilization upon even the most heinous of criminals, is inadvertently encouraging the cancer-like growth of sociopathic behaviour in our population. If sociopathic behaviour is a genetic trait (and there is increasingly disturbing evidence that it is), then it would make sense to try to eliminate its growth in our gene pool.
are you serisous

Locked