New Testingstan

yeah, it's no la marseillaise that's for sure

"what do you think Australia's national anthem should be?"
"waltzing matilda, because it's about stealing"

Before I joined TEO, I never realized that reading was so hard, even for the literate.

I guess that explains the reading comprehension sections of standardized tests. I would bet that 50% of TEO would fail a reading comprehension test at the high school level.

Ugh!

thejester wrote:"what do you think Australia's national anthem should be?"
"waltzing matilda, because it's about stealing"

Stofsk wrote:

thejester wrote:"what do you think Australia's national anthem should be?"
"waltzing matilda, because it's about stealing"

a true australian patriot

Pretty much every main character is a psychic wreck and a lot of the series focused on them when the focus should have been on the SciFi action.

I'm watching SciFi, not a soap opera in space. Yes, the pew-pews and the stardrives and the laser swords do take precedence over the relationship garbage.

And that's all you need.

man i hate nbsg but i feel like defending it when people like batman criticise it

Oxymoron wrote:

Dooey Jo wrote:sometimes i use lazorz to blind them when i'm too tired to chase them

THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE GENEVA CONVENTION

they are illegal terrists you cannot touch me

If we're rolling out potential new Aus National Anthems I want Better

http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... 2&t=154301

ok good job guys

which one of you did this

Why do people even bother to debate video games? It's not like a couple of cutscenes and the gameplay presents decent material for analysis.

tell that to the robomormons amirite

Well, Btech has the books, but they have their own problems. People actually try to debate BTech with game mechanics? Not debate the quality of the game or something else subjective, but an actual vs. debate?

MAXIMUM POSTURING

Some guys on starfleetjedi tried to get workable ranges and stuff out of the 40k tt stuff.

Darksi4190 wrote:Well, Btech has the books, but they have their own problems. People actually try to debate BTech with game mechanics? Not debate the quality of the game or something else subjective, but an actual vs. debate?

you didn't see the Zeon vs Clans thread

using game stats to create relativistic velocity AC20 rounds

Man that was pretty crazy

'Basically they'll just obliterate colonies with sublight kinetic kill weapons' 'Is this anything at all like the actual setting' 'Who cares'

best part is when Painrack joined

and was confusing himself

He asked the big questions
Like

On which planet are giant axes manufactured, and by whom

they also try to argue teh MEGA ARMORZ by using the game stats right

except a PPC is only five times the damage of machine gun bullets

BUT IT HAS A RANGE OF LIKE A FOOTBALL FIELD!!!!

beam saber split an asteroid

use the asteroid calc maker thing lawl

Why am I involving myself in a I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP shit flinging match in the Apple thread? Why am I debating something I fundamentally agree with because Ryan Thunder and HMS Conqueror are absolute morons?

apple sucks ass

it should be attacked at every opportunity