Page 4 of 488
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:34 pm
by adr-admin
Yeah, those make more sense.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:54 pm
by Stofsk
As far as this debate is concerned, I'm on the side of filesharing. Big organisations like the RIAA and MPAA engage in so many shady practices and their influence spreads far beyond their borders to the point that it affects the laws sovereign nations formulate to deal with this 'problem' that frankly I think doesn't really exist.
In a perfect world copyright infringement should not exist. That's because in a perfect world we'd all be living in a Star Trek style utopia where big corporations can't sue the shit out of people for downloading a fucking playlist.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:57 pm
by Zod
i don't actually have a clue what thread is being talked about but knowing the site you can practically write an automated script for the typical filesharing debate
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:20 pm
by uraniun235
Zod wrote:i don't actually have a clue what thread is being talked about but knowing the site you can practically write an automated script for any debate
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:23 pm
by Zod
uraniun235 wrote:Zod wrote:i don't actually have a clue what thread is being talked about but knowing the site you can practically write an automated script for any debate
eh, depends
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:27 pm
by uraniun235
insert an 'almost' in there and call it good?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:49 pm
by Djinnkitty83
VF5SS wrote:Djinnkitty83 wrote:I actually get the same vibes trying to debate them on this that I get from conspiracy theorists and creationists:
as I said to Amoebamang, we should start calling Jim and his ilk priests of the prequels or Preistquels if you will.
Maybe Prequepulicans
or Prequelcrats
Prequeltarians?
Missed this.
Prequationists.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:00 pm
by Aaron
I would think that Vader and Palps would indicate the danger in letting people with magic powers both develop them and serve in the government.
Vader especially indicates that Jedi are fallible. Along with Ben and Jinn using their powers for stupid trivial shit.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:01 pm
by Zod
Aaron wrote:I would think that Vader and Palps would indicate the danger in letting people with magic powers both develop them and serve in the government.
Vader especially indicates that Jedi are fallible. Along with Ben and Jinn using their powers for stupid trivial shit.
obviously it was the dark side throwing them off
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:04 pm
by Aaron
Force make people I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP.
Lvl 15?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:08 pm
by Black_Mage
Nietzslime wrote:isn't flash like a timelord now
lolol dc reboot
Wouldn't surprise me.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:21 pm
by artemas
Stofsk wrote:
In a perfect world copyright infringement should not exist. That's because in a perfect world we'd all be living in a Star Trek style utopia where big corporations can't sue the shit out of people for downloading a fucking playlist.
Are you a fucking Communist, Stofsk?
EDIT: man, these smilies are lame. i wanted to put that cross-armed little dude.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:59 pm
by Stofsk
artemas wrote:Stofsk wrote:
In a perfect world copyright infringement should not exist. That's because in a perfect world we'd all be living in a Star Trek style utopia where big corporations can't sue the shit out of people for downloading a fucking playlist.
Are you a fucking Communist, Stofsk?
what are you, my mother?
man these smilies suck
seriously though i'm pretty much a bleeding heart leftie so... yeah?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:02 pm
by artemas
clean up your room!
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:22 pm
by Gands
Is it time for a copyright moratorium yet?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:38 pm
by Aaron
Wait till an old boy flip outs and starts shit posting, then we can have a moratorium.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:05 am
by artemas
wait
stofsk
does your mother actually ask if you're a fucking commie?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:11 am
by Losonti Tokash
man yesterday i had someone complain that one of the songs we have with the preschoolers was changed to be politically correct
it's to teach them to count so they sing about bumblebees buzzing around and shit
apparently it used to be "1 little 2 little 3 little indians"
i think as i'm getting older this stuff is really starting to piss me off because i didn't used to mind being called one, but it probably also has something to do with the context
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:15 am
by Aaron
I remember that song.
But I hear failing to encourage casual racism means you hate America.
Also, aren't Stofsks folks from communist Hungry? That could colour things a tad.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:24 am
by Stofsk
yeah mum teases me about my politics i tease her about her english
we have some animated discussions, sometimes the dog barks because he wants to share his opinion too, then she makes me pancakes with ice cream
i'm not really a commie but i'm the leftest out of my family so calling me a communist is kind of a joke
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:39 am
by artemas
ah ha! the bat is out of the cag
re old song
i wonder what the exact reason to change it was?
like was it new immigrants from India, with native concerns invisible, or final cognizance of relaxed, yet callous, racism?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:51 am
by Losonti Tokash
man casual racism against asian indians is fairly acceptable because they apparently look like arabs
but the only place i've seen them in any kind of concentration is the northeast us, midwest basically has like zero which is a shame since those women are fine as hell
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:01 am
by Phantasee
Good luck with those, buddy. The South Asian communities are relaxing a little now* but go back five years and you'd be hard pressed to find more than a couple willing to date outside the community. Go back ten and you'll be lucky to find more than a couple willing to openly date any guys, and another five to find a time when nobody in those communities dared to go at it in secret. In smaller communities? Well they'll always be more insular in general and probably more strict with their kids.
*Well, the girls are relaxing, and it's kind of a critical mass situation where I don't think the parents can really do anything anymore. Plus CBC Documentaries about honour killings have kinda put a damper on anyone considering it.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:03 am
by Losonti Tokash
man if only all the indian girls at rutgers weren't dating white guys? :V
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:18 am
by Phantasee
That's New Jersey. It's not the same situation as the Midwest (you're in Nebraska still?). In Canada the people have been around in more cohesive communities so they've retained some of their values longer. In the US it seems they've been less numerous overall and less concentrated, so they've assimilated faster. So the assimilation has taken longer here with major centers like Toronto and Vancouver going first and it filtering out to smaller centres over time. Also I believe there are more Hindus/South Indians in the US Indo-American population versus more Sikhs/Punjabis/North Indians in the Indo-Canadian population, with some cultural and religious differences in the mix.
Man, some days I miss sociology.