Page 352 of 488
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:33 am
by starku
dont' be mean adr loves her
probably because they're both giant spergers
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:04 am
by Zod
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:04 am
by Director of Celestial Intelligence
It has to be, she's always been an ITG.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:05 am
by Gands
What is ITG?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:05 am
by starku
the best part is where she characterises her 'tolerance' as preventing world war three
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:06 am
by Aaron
Internet tough guy I suppose.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:08 am
by starku
she's an internet pissing me off
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:10 am
by Aaron
I wish she'd go back to talking about her birds.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:10 am
by Director of Celestial Intelligence
Gands wrote:What is ITG?
Internet Tough Guy/Girl.
It's basically that person you see on every discussion forum saying "If I'd been at Virginia Tech I would've just shot him with my
SIG P220 Carry Equinox" or "They should've covered OBL in pigs blood and displayed him in downtown NY".
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:15 am
by starku
he means 'shep'
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:41 am
by Director of Celestial Intelligence
starku wrote:he means 'shep'
That's not fair, we only have evidence that Shep would shoot someone in the back, we have no reason to believe he'd ever shoot them from the front.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:42 am
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Aaron wrote:Get a hair cut you damn hippy!
Well that's just like, your opinion man...
Sup A, how's you and the wife?
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:27 am
by adr-admin
from the D chatroom
(00:06:34) enjoysmath: ?boobies
(00:06:34) dbot: boobies == ( ( o ) ) ( ( o ) )
(00:07:24) enjoysmath: ?dance
(00:07:25) dbot: dance == (>'-')> <('-'<) ^('-')^ v('-')v <('-'<) ^( )^ (>'-')> ^(^-^)>
so this bizarre newb from last month came in and set those two idiotic thingies
the chatroom has a bot that will let you set links and definitions and pull it up on demand
most people use it for linking to the faq or their projects etc
here's an example of what it is normally used for
(00:30:55) Destructionator: ?IFTI
(00:30:56) dbot: IFTI == implicit function template instantiation
(00:31:16) Destructionator: ?UFCS
(00:31:18) dbot: ufcs == Uniform/Unified Function Call Syntax: foo(someArray) <=> someArray.foo()
btu this guy used it for the above crap
and the weirdest thing is he just pulls them up at random
like the chat room is silent
and then he posts ?boobies out of the blue and then it goes silent again
what the christ
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:09 am
by Losonti Tokash
holy shit
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:20 am
by Gands
Wow, dragon was amusing.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:21 am
by starku
Pardon
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:22 am
by Gands
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:23 am
by Zod
sorry no pardons without an executive order
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:25 am
by Gands
Or OBC membership card
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:31 am
by starku
remember guys you can't bandy around psychiatric diagnoses willy nilly on sdn
well you can't if your flagg and eveyrone hates you
but fgalkin well
-dan
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 5:51 am
by Losonti Tokash
man i sure love how it's acceptable to just constantly call someone mentally I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 6:30 am
by xon
Zod wrote:sorry no pardons without an executive order
Considering Wong has a image of his wife wearing less than that linked pic in his sig, dragon really should appeal to Wong about it
But calling on a mod being a fucking hypocrite with double standards will probably mean the ban sticks.
Losonti Tokash wrote:man i sure love how it's acceptable to just constantly call someone mentally I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP
It's one fo the many failings for SDN. Way to much attacking the person rather than the argument.
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 6:50 am
by uraniun235
Oxymoron wrote:Mang, States with different laws on the same subjects... What an archaic bullshit.
"States Rights !!!"
if there was absolute federal supremacy i'm pretty sure the nation would be worse off in general
which isn't really a defense so much as it is an indictment of the country's culture and society
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:18 am
by Bakustra
Losonti Tokash wrote:man i sure love how it's acceptable to just constantly call someone mentally I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP
on this note, thanas, i would be very interested in your opinions on the thread i just posted in slam
also, dalton, your zero-tolerance policy seriously hampers any ability to discuss slurs intellectually
thought you might like to know
anyways, i probably could have brought up the use of cocksucker as an example of normalized homophobia and sexism, but im pretty sure that that would get me marked as trolling for use of sociology
Re: Godammed SDN
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:24 am
by F.J. Prefect, Esq
Actually if memory serves me right, Darth Wong started a thread asking that question about the usage of 'cocksucker' and other similar slurs. I don't remember how it went. I don't think i want to know, given that I may have posted in it and it's long enough ago that I was still probably pretty fucking stupid.