Trek Thread

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger.
Message
Author
User avatar
Big Orangutan
Hipster
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 8:37 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#901 Post by Big Orangutan »

RyanThunder wrote:I mean planetside missile silos and emergency shields for buildings and what not. I'm not asking for impregnability here.

Whatever the case, the Enterprise and Vengeance were both able to make dangerously close to a major population centre unchallenged. That's just not acceptable. Even if we accept that they can't stop something that big from hitting the ground (which isn't unreasonable), there wasn't even anything trying to stop them. Suppose one of their space docks falls out of orbit. What then?
Well they were technically friendly vessels who suffered unfortunate accidents from the point of view of Earth's mission control. Stopping crashing ships is different from stopping attacking ships (plus there were loads of emergency service vessels going into action).
Furthermore, airspace control. Khan zoomed right up to Starfleet Command with that gunship, completely unchallenged. The admirals had to request air defense teams to try to shoot it down.
That bit bothered me as well, I'd thought an emergency military meeting after a terrorist/guerrilla attack would take place in a bunker.
Though the whole stunk anyway and was part of Admiral Robocop's plan, trying to manipulate both Kirk and Khan.
*Insert Pretentious Quote Here*

User avatar
Flagg
Posts: 2123
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:45 am

Re: Trek Thread

#902 Post by Flagg »

Yeah the thing that still shits me about the first one was how Spock had to shoot down the Narada's drill platform. Why didn't the federation have some fighters? I mean we see them in the sequel.
CUNTS! FOR! EYES!
The Liberal Hate Machine

User avatar
evilsoup
Posts: 2354
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 12:01 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#903 Post by evilsoup »

...I don't remember any fighters in Into Darkness, where did they turn up?

For the next film, I bet they'll do the Mirror Universe stuff.
Image

User avatar
Flagg
Posts: 2123
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:45 am

Re: Trek Thread

#904 Post by Flagg »

evilsoup wrote:...I don't remember any fighters in Into Darkness, where did they turn up?

For the next film, I bet they'll do the Mirror Universe stuff.
At the end, they flew over the funeral.
CUNTS! FOR! EYES!
The Liberal Hate Machine

User avatar
RogueIce
#YOLO
Posts: 2089
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:57 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#905 Post by RogueIce »

You know, in all this speculation about what nuTrek III should do, I think everybody is overlooking the most important element they could have.

Uhura doing the fan dance. :giggidy:

User avatar
RyanThunder
Knows Best
Posts: 725
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:18 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#906 Post by RyanThunder »

Look to your avatar :picard:

Darksi4190
Not a Brony (Probably lol)
Posts: 1733
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Trek Thread

#907 Post by Darksi4190 »

RogueIce wrote:Uhura doing the fan dance. :giggidy:
You fool! Now you've put that vomit-inducing mental image from STV in my head. It will take me days to force it back out. Days of abject horror.

User avatar
Bounty
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#908 Post by Bounty »

Saw the new movie last night. In short: it's a good action movie, and apart from being very LOUD and FAST there isn't much wrong with it. The plot's convoluted but it all fits, the acting is actually pretty great (especially Cumberbatch - the guy does creepy like few people do creepy), the effects are super duper. There's a lot more humor and it actually works.

I'm just really disappointed that like the last movie, it's really navelgazing-y. The opening scenes are on an actual honest-to-god alien planet with alien natives and it was great, but after five minutes we're back to Earth and a villain trying to kill everybody. That stuff worked in the original film series because it came *after* a show about galloping into the great unknown, but here it's really grating.
Looks like they're setting up the third movie to be away from Earth, unless there's a five-year timeskip to the crew getting back from their wonderful space adventures...
It's also stuffed with blink-and-you-miss-it Trek references. Like, a lot of them.
also Kirk bangs twin Caitians
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.

User avatar
Big Orangutan
Hipster
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 8:37 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#909 Post by Big Orangutan »

Flagg wrote:Yeah the thing that still shits me about the first one was how Spock had to shoot down the Narada's drill platform. Why didn't the federation have some fighters? I mean we see them in the sequel.
Vulcan and Earth may have sent off militia/police interceptors to fight Nero's giant doomship off screen (then presumably shot down in short order).
*Insert Pretentious Quote Here*

User avatar
evilsoup
Posts: 2354
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 12:01 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#910 Post by evilsoup »

They may not have had those kinds of fighters in the first film
Image

Darksi4190
Not a Brony (Probably lol)
Posts: 1733
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Trek Thread

#911 Post by Darksi4190 »

How much time has passed between ST'09 and the end of Into Darkness?

A couple of years? Is that enough time to design, test, and deploy a new type of fighter aircraft?

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#912 Post by Oxymoron »

In real life, probably not, or probably just a 'stop-gap' design.

Though with Future Technologies(tm) who knows ?
No.

User avatar
evilsoup
Posts: 2354
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 12:01 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#913 Post by evilsoup »

The ships could well have been in the testing stage when ST09 happened
or they could just be some kind of atmospheric fighters
Image

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#914 Post by Oxymoron »

So, complete ST newb question :

Does the United Federation of Planets even have a "military" so to speak ? I mean, I have been led to understand that Starfleet primary concern was exploration and flag-showing, not to be an offensive force.

Do the federated planets even have the right to maintain a self-defense force ?
No.

User avatar
Big Orangutan
Hipster
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 8:37 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#915 Post by Big Orangutan »

It makes sense that Earth, Vulcan, and other major member worlds maintain their own defence forces (similar to State Troopers or a localised Coast Guard) but that was never really explored properly in Old-Trek, before a under-aged Kirk got chased by that local hover bike officer (also you had Starfleet officers or enlisted men acting like street cops).

The Starfleet uniforms have been revamped a bit (with Starfleet having formal looking dove grey navy/air force looking dress uniforms).
*Insert Pretentious Quote Here*

User avatar
adr
Moon Prism Power, Make Up!
Posts: 1462
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#916 Post by adr »

We do know there's such things as "Vulcan ships" so probably yes to the federated q.
In the name of the moon, I will punish you!

User avatar
Bounty
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#917 Post by Bounty »

In TOS it was pretty unclear, mainly because everything about the universe tended to change from one episode to the next (Does Kirk work for Earth? UESPA? The Federation?). Then in TNG the Vulcans had their own defense fleet for a few episodes even though they were also a major part of Starfleet. Everything afterwards put space defense on Starfleet.

So it's really 'whatever the hell floats your boat'.
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.

Darksi4190
Not a Brony (Probably lol)
Posts: 1733
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Trek Thread

#918 Post by Darksi4190 »

A science fiction universe inconsistent with itself?

Inconceivable!

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#919 Post by Oxymoron »

[nerdrage]
No.

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#920 Post by Oxymoron »

How do you want to quantify anything in these conditions ! Seriously, guys...
No.

User avatar
Bounty
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#921 Post by Bounty »

It's still weird seeing an Enterprise that big. The new massive lobby set... Christ. Nice core though.
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.

User avatar
Big Orangutan
Hipster
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 8:37 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#922 Post by Big Orangutan »

Bounty wrote: The new massive lobby set... Christ.
I dig the circular atrium area as well, but it seemed like something more suited to the Enterprise-D (if they didn't have a relatively low TV budget). The engineering sector was greatly improved as well.
*Insert Pretentious Quote Here*

User avatar
RogueIce
#YOLO
Posts: 2089
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:57 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#923 Post by RogueIce »

Apparently the warp core is a real place, just with set dressing added.

User avatar
Flagg
Posts: 2123
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:45 am

Re: Trek Thread

#924 Post by Flagg »

RogueIce wrote:Apparently the warp core is a real place, just with set dressing added.
Yeah it's an actual fusion reactor test core.
CUNTS! FOR! EYES!
The Liberal Hate Machine

Manus Dei
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:56 am
Location: a few seconds of arrhythmic thrusting

Re: Trek Thread

#925 Post by Manus Dei »

All the white gave it a very NASA feel, which was cool.

Also Bumbledick Cuddlebunch was ace, the way he delivered the
"John Harrison was a fiction created the moment my pod was opened, a smokescreen created to hide my true nature. My name...is KHAN.
line was perfect.
Ralin wrote:Finally I realized that when Walker fights the Satanic ponies I need to mention how his 'lower horn' is glowing and sparkling as it draws in and focuses Equestria's ambient magic.

Post Reply