Godammed SDN

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger.
Message
Author
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
has no method to his madness.
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:32 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5026 Post by Darth Fanboy »

Mr.Coffee wrote:Also, Fanboy's apparently my boyfriend now. I call big spoon!
:giggidy:

User avatar
Questor
Posts: 793
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:51 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5027 Post by Questor »

LOL

You see, this is when you can tell they're messed up. They're trying to take the attention by calling you gay. The irony of that is just hilarious.*

You know, it makes me wonder what would happen if you used your powers for good (or evil) instead of the lulz.

*(For anyone from TEO reading this, or just the humor challenged) The irony is that the christian right vilifies homosexuals by calling them child molesters and implying that one leads to the other. You could also throw in some Catholic irony, too.
Last edited by Questor on Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mr.Coffee
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:53 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5028 Post by Mr.Coffee »

Loving the human sacrifice/slaver jab. Stay classy, DF!

User avatar
Darth Fanboy
has no method to his madness.
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:32 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5029 Post by Darth Fanboy »

Mr.Coffee wrote:Stay classy, DF!
NEVER!

User avatar
Mr.Coffee
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:53 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5030 Post by Mr.Coffee »

You stay classy, gooddamn it, or I'll dress you in the gimp suit and lock you in the barrel again!

User avatar
Questor
Posts: 793
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:51 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5031 Post by Questor »

Did Terriblename just make a square-rectangle mistake?

User avatar
Mr.Coffee
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:53 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5032 Post by Mr.Coffee »

He basically said long windedly that as long as you're not actually fucking kids that thinking about fucking kids is okie fine.

User avatar
Questor
Posts: 793
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:51 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5033 Post by Questor »

S.L.Acker wrote:Stofsk, being a mod doesn't mean you get a pass on actually arguing a point.
And the Slacker calls out a mod!

User avatar
Mr.Coffee
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:53 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5034 Post by Mr.Coffee »

It's almost like they want to get banned but are to chickenshit to just come out and say it.

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5035 Post by Zod »

Except, rape is sex against one's consent, ie, that one is out of control of. So they're the same.
itt terralthra minces semantics

but just for fun let's see what webster has to say
Definition of CONSENT
intransitive verb
1
: to give assent or approval : agree <consent to being tested>
2
archaic : to be in concord in opinion or sentiment
— con·sent·er noun
— con·sent·ing·ly adverb
See consent defined for English-language learners »
See consent defined for kids
by gum i do believe you can consent to relinquishing control

is this why bdsm fetishists use safe words
Image

User avatar
Darth Fanboy
has no method to his madness.
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:32 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5036 Post by Darth Fanboy »

Zod that avatar really enhances all of your posts, gotta say.

User avatar
Darth Fanboy
has no method to his madness.
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:32 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5037 Post by Darth Fanboy »

I feel like I have gone above and beyond the call to get a moderator to look into that thread

(no offense Stofsk you are too cool to lump in with those guys)

User avatar
weemadando
Posts: 534
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:36 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5038 Post by weemadando »

I may have been reading it wrong, but did it really go down the "people fantasise about rape therefore rape is normal and ok" hole?

Because seriously, if that's your best defence against paedophilia arguments, you're going poorly.

User avatar
Darth Fanboy
has no method to his madness.
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:32 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5039 Post by Darth Fanboy »

YOU GUYS
Pedobeario wrote: Would you like to present your case for children being unable to consent?

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5040 Post by Zod »

INFORMED consent

no seriously

INFORMED consent

INFORMED is the key word when discussing consent
Image

User avatar
Darth Fanboy
has no method to his madness.
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:32 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5041 Post by Darth Fanboy »

Do I seriously like, need to say everything in length like that? I guess so.

Like, if I don't say "informed consent" am I somehow implying that any child capable of saying the words "yes and no" can consent to sexual activity?

Good news for the Catholic Church I guess

User avatar
Questor
Posts: 793
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:51 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5042 Post by Questor »

Oh... My... God...

We have unmasked a secret pedobear cult. I wonder exactly when this triggers my mandatory reporting requirements?

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#5043 Post by Oxymoron »

weemadando wrote:"people fantasise about rape therefore rape is normal and ok"
"people fantasise about beating their wife/husband therefore conjugal violence is normal and ok"
"people fantasise about dominating others violently therefore being an asshole is normal and ok"
"people fantasise about murdering each other therefore murder is normal and ok"
:hurfhurf:


God, I could continue like this all day long.
No.

Dooey Jo
Posts: 568
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:35 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5044 Post by Dooey Jo »

oh wow, in like ten minutes the thread got both the "appeal to board rules" and "comparison to creationists" badges

there should be a TEO bingo or something
DracuLax - when even Death can't scare the shit out of you

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5045 Post by Zod »

Darth Fanboy wrote:Do I seriously like, need to say everything in length like that? I guess so.

Like, if I don't say "informed consent" am I somehow implying that any child capable of saying the words "yes and no" can consent to sexual activity?

Good news for the Catholic Church I guess
consider who you're dealing with in that thread

you might have to use smaller words
Image

User avatar
Darth Fanboy
has no method to his madness.
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:32 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5046 Post by Darth Fanboy »

Dooey Jo wrote:oh wow, in like ten minutes the thread got both the "appeal to board rules" and "comparison to creationists" badges

there should be a TEO bingo or something
You don't know how bad I have felt like dropping "CONCESSION ACCEPTED" When Cesario and Slacker basically admitted pedophila is cool AS LONG AS YOU KEEP IT UPSTAIRS!

Should change my Av to Pedobear and then the location to "Hanging out with Cesario"

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#5047 Post by Oxymoron »

Darth Fanboy wrote:Should change my Av to Pedobear and then the location to "Hanging out with Cesario"
Yes. That would be quite the fun, indeed.
No.

User avatar
Mr.Coffee
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:53 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5048 Post by Mr.Coffee »

Do it, send me the av and we'll bandwagon that son of a bitch.

Infinity Biscuit
Battering Ram of Love
Posts: 928
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:36 pm

Re: Godammed SDN

#5049 Post by Infinity Biscuit »

weemadando wrote:I may have been reading it wrong, but did it really go down the "people fantasise about rape therefore rape is normal and ok" hole?

Because seriously, if that's your best defence against paedophilia arguments, you're going poorly.
You did read that wrong because the argument Terra's trying to make is "a lot of people fantasise about terrible things (like sexually assaulting adults or kids or elephants), so cut fantasy some slack if no one actually goes through with anything" which I think is fairly reasonable? I mean he's not saying that having those inclinations is a good thing.

That line of thought is left to Cesario and Slacker!

Best defense against pedophilia arguments is obviously "Ancient Greeks made shota manga"

(seriously I have trouble actually accepting that people would try to argue that sexually assaulting kids is a good thing help)
Image

User avatar
Mr.Coffee
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:53 am

Re: Godammed SDN

#5050 Post by Mr.Coffee »

Actually, I think Slacker just topped Ancient Greece with his "why boner" concept.

Locked