Me.Aaron wrote:Who wasn't
The Return of Testing Chat Thread
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
In hindsight it is pretty funny.
-
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:11 pm
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
That entire period was like a 'be careful what you wish for' morality play put on by the entire board for DW.
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
I like that it's still labelled Senate V1.
Is there a sequel coming?
Is there a sequel coming?
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
I doubt it, its obvious at this point that he doesn't care about the board beyond the WoT thread.
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
I don't think he's allowed to do both FB and SDN, so he had to choose and we lost to FB.
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
Not much of a surprise, there's less drama on FB.Flagg wrote:I don't think he's allowed to do both FB and SDN, so he had to choose and we lost to FB.
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
That say something.Zod wrote:Not much of a surprise, there's less drama on FB.Flagg wrote:I don't think he's allowed to do both FB and SDN, so he had to choose and we lost to FB.
No.
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
Request to the Administration :
could we get rid of that insular bullshit anti-spambot question when registering ?
Connor got defeated by it when trying to register.
could we get rid of that insular bullshit anti-spambot question when registering ?
Connor got defeated by it when trying to register.
No.
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
i didnt wanna taek it down entirely (lest spambots come in too much) so tell me if you know the answer to this one
i'm so bad at thisName one of the colors in a rainbow
-
- Posts: 1456
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
adr is it super worth worrying about spambots since we can just, you know, not activate them
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
i guess so but that could be a hassle
but since you do most the activation anyway whichever way you prefer
but since you do most the activation anyway whichever way you prefer
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
turned off for now
In the name of the moon, I will punish you!
-
- Fuckin' New Guy
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:39 am
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
More like I got defeated by my complete and utter obliviousness to the interpersonal dynamics of a forum (any forum.)Oxymoron wrote:Connor got defeated by it when trying to register.
Still it only took me like fifteen times trying to enter variations of Stardestroyer.net before I gave up and pm'ed ya back. That counts for something, right?
-
- The Mang, the Myth, the Legend.
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:13 am
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
Unpossible, helmets too awesome.
-
- Fuckin' New Guy
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:39 am
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
Shroom Man 777 wrote:compute the gigajoules in the explosions within this video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RbIGuLXCziU
One I got done having seizuers with all the flashing, I figure its probably 1 GIGAJOULE at most. although thats of 'boom' joulage and not burny joulage, so its actually more effective for the given amount of joulage and requires far less ice to tend (although you might be picking glass fragments out of your eyes.)
It's also possible its not even in the giga-joulage range but only mega-joulage, but since its joulage of the 'bang' variety it could translate into comparable 'burny' joulage, I suppose depending on your conversion factor.
I saw through your little trap AND got to prove Aaron wrong. GO TEAM TECHNICAL!
-
- Posts: 1456
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
just delete them all like i already doPhantasee wrote:Yo Los if I start getting a bunch if activation emails I'm going to be very upset.
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
so the early learning stuff to get ahead in school. if you watch the kids tv you've seen it
my question: why bother? it's one thing if you were going to keep up the pressure throughout but these things are pre-school learning (at best) and then drop off
let's suppose it works as advertised. so your kid is ahead for kindergaten and maybe grade one.... then the regular school catches up to them. so the early lead is quickly surrendered
is that worth anything?
my question: why bother? it's one thing if you were going to keep up the pressure throughout but these things are pre-school learning (at best) and then drop off
let's suppose it works as advertised. so your kid is ahead for kindergaten and maybe grade one.... then the regular school catches up to them. so the early lead is quickly surrendered
is that worth anything?
In the name of the moon, I will punish you!
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
Maybe if you go to a non-public school? Or your public schools are in a good/rich district.adr wrote:so the early learning stuff to get ahead in school. if you watch the kids tv you've seen it
my question: why bother? it's one thing if you were going to keep up the pressure throughout but these things are pre-school learning (at best) and then drop off
let's suppose it works as advertised. so your kid is ahead for kindergaten and maybe grade one.... then the regular school catches up to them. so the early lead is quickly surrendered
is that worth anything?
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
Seeing as young children generally learn by playing, we sent ours to a pre-school/daycare that had lots of activities.
My wifes niece did all that and attends a private school, she's just as dumb as any other 14 year old i've met.
My wifes niece did all that and attends a private school, she's just as dumb as any other 14 year old i've met.
Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread
Assuming the guitar riffs are spherical masses of iron.Shroom Man 777 wrote:compute the gigajoules in the explosions within this video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=RbIGuLXCziU
I calculate a billion METALtons.