The Return of Testing Chat Thread

[Flagg]

Probably illegal anyways.

Dude go to Florida, shoot Chuckles, and put a hoodie on the corpse and you'll get away with it.

[Aaron]

Lol.

Murder isn't really my thing, besides, that only works on blacks.

[Flagg]

Lol.

Murder isn't really my thing, besides, that only works on blacks.

Magic marker and a can of grape soda. It works every time according to Shep. WAKKA WAKKA!

[Oxymoron]

I need a smiley that can synthesize these two ones :

[Aaron]

Jesus

[Djinnkitty83]

Is bloodypants actually trying to argue that all pedophiles are smart people who think everything through before acting on their uncontrollable urges?

Flagg: I suggest you take a step back, and think a bit before posting in this thread again. If you do, I want you to post a small summary of your argument, with some evidence/data to support it. "But, but, but ... PEDOPHILES! KIDS!" won't do it.

Quit being a hysterical twit, Cartman.

As for me, Rhi gave me some good advice: Trying to argue with the Cartman and Favra show is in ways similar to this halloween law: They're both stupid, reactionary idiots who lose what little sense of rationality they might have had when confronted with push-button words like 'pedophile' and 'fat'. They aren't going to change their minds because they are insane, and logic has no effect on that. In a sense, Cartman and Favra both represent some of the worst aspects of TEO brought over here, which I'm sure Shroomie would be happy to point out is not a good thing. Thus arguing with them is like the halloween law in that it takes time and energy and accomplishes no useful end, and distracts me from more productive pursuits, such as doing more stuff for her, or sadly, playing Everquest. Because playing Everquest is a more productive pursuit than trying to get the Cartman and Favra show to not be a pair of hysterical, tryhard dumbasses.

So fuck it, I'm out.

[Flagg]

Is bloodypants actually trying to argue that all pedophiles are smart people who think everything through before acting on their uncontrollable urges?

Flagg: I suggest you take a step back, and think a bit before posting in this thread again. If you do, I want you to post a small summary of your argument, with some evidence/data to support it. "But, but, but ... PEDOPHILES! KIDS!" won't do it.

Quit being a hysterical twit, Cartman.

As for me, Rhi gave me some good advice: Trying to argue with the Cartman and Favra show is in ways similar to this halloween law: They're both stupid, reactionary idiots who lose what little sense of rationality they might have had when confronted with push-button words like 'pedophile' and 'fat'. They aren't going to change their minds because they are insane, and logic has no effect on that. In a sense, Cartman and Favra both represent some of the worst aspects of TEO brought over here, which I'm sure Shroomie would be happy to point out is not a good thing. Thus arguing with them is like the halloween law in that it takes time and energy and accomplishes no useful end, and distracts me from more productive pursuits, such as doing more stuff for her, or sadly, playing Everquest. Because playing Everquest is a more productive pursuit than trying to get the Cartman and Favra show to not be a pair of hysterical, tryhard dumbasses.

So fuck it, I'm out.

Don't let the door hit you in the ass.

[Flagg]

The really funny thing is that Zods not the one who brought up guns, Jub is. Because restricting the rights of violent felons is ok, as long as they aren't pedophiles.

[Djinnkitty83]

I gotta admit, there is something satisfying about the ignore function.

[Aaron]

We have one?

[evilsoup]

yes
'foe list'

[joviwan]

Oh, wow, that's really handy. thanks for point that out.

[adr]

We have one?

http://testingstan.arsdnet.net/forum/uc ... &mode=foes

[Flagg]

So I don't have to put up with Oni's crossboard vendettapothy anymore? HURRA!

[Flagg]

Now, on to serious business:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=eRTugqDo1WM

[adr]

I'm watching The Five on Fox News right now. One of these guys just said "they appeased the mob, which incited the mob"

aren't appeasement and incitement antonyms? the bing dictionary says they are....


this guy is an asshole and an idiot. they started out fine talking about the state department's bullshit but have now gone right into regular islamophobia. ugh.

[Flagg]

I'm watching The Five on Fox News right now. One of these guys just said "they appeased the mob, which incited the mob"

aren't appeasement and incitement antonyms? the bing dictionary says they are....


this guy is an asshole and an idiot. they started out fine talking about the state department's bullshit but have now gone right into regular islamophobia. ugh.

[adr]

LOL "Job Creators Revolt" (where the job creators are big company CEOs) to Obama's "class warfare" as the "unofficial leader of occupy wall street"

this is great entertainment

[Flagg]

LOL "Job Creators Revolt" (where the job creators are big company CEOs) to Obama's "class warfare" as the "unofficial leader of occupy wall street"

this is great entertainment

FOX NEWS

[adr]

so if gold is such a great investment and so much better than dollars.... why are you willing to trade your gold for my dollars?

[Darth Tedious]

You could say that appeasing the mob encouraged them, but incite is a poor word choice

[adr]

yeah, which is surely what he meant. really as soon as someone says "appeasement" you can be sure they are saying it was a bad thing that just made things worse. which of course sucks in its own way

[Darth Tedious]

Yeah, having to appease someone doesn't imply a friendly relationship with them

[Count Chocula]

Lol.

Murder isn't really my thing, besides, that only works on blacks.

You'd also have to be an Hispanic man with a European surname.

[evilsoup]

race is a funny thing