To get back on the original subject : what do you think of Max's argument that integrating women in the infantry might prove to be a logistical hassle (ie : having to provide different facilities for men and women, as well as different living quarters, etc.) ?
Wouldn't that be solved easily enough by not segregating men and women in these cases ? Or am I missing something essential ?
Every other trade does it, the infantry can suck it up.
But I tented with woman. The only thing segregated was the shitter, which was just a hole so we took turns and the shower which is piss easy to do. And there weren't that many woman anyway, less then 25% of the total force.
Max is being a Marine, in other words he's being an idiot.
- So apparently, we are now forced to accept not only sissies, but also goddamn women. Let me tell you one thing : I don't care if you have dicks or cunts or whatever. You are all the same to me. You are nothing. You are the basest kind of lifeform in this planet, and I am your motherfucking GOD. Until asked to speak, you WILL SHUT YOUR MOUTH. Did I make myself clear ?!
Instant Sunrise wrote:I made a personal rule many years ago that anybody who argued the semantics between pedophile and ephebophile was not worth listening to.
It has yet to fail me.
fun fact- ephebophilia means that you specifically get off on the thought of underage sex, so in order for the semantics to even be arguable (eg meaningfully different) you have to start out with lies or misrepresentations
someone who's attracted to pubescent children, rather than pre-pubescent children
someone who wants to bang 14-year-olds
there is a difference in how they're reacted to vs paedophiles, though, so it's not an entirely meaningless distinction. For example, there was a teacher who ran away to France with a 15-year-old student of his recently, and the general reaction from people I know was :I well you've really fucked up your life now haven't you buddy
whereas if she was a 10-year-old the consensus would have been 'go kill yourself in a fire pls'
So, a journalist, writer and member of the French Academy, just went back from Mali and told on national television what is current the situation there.
It's basically 1984 meets Fallout's Raiders.
Well, I want to make an "official" statement : as long as the current situation continue, I will present no opposition toward an armed intervention in the Region to restore order and justice, be it by the African Union or the European components of NATO.
I will only oppose for the United States to be a part of such an operation. They would only fuck everything up, like they always do.
I may view myself as a Pacifist, but even I have standards.