The Return of Testing Chat Thread

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger.
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
RyanThunder
Knows Best
Posts: 725
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:18 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1751 Post by RyanThunder »

Straha wrote:
RyanThunder wrote:@Straha: Maybe you just thought I was being brief, but you should notice that I actually snipped out the part about factory farm conditions.

Which I do have a problem with for the reasons you mentioned. What I do not have any problem with whatsoever is any number of animals being slaughtered for food, as long as its sustainable.
You're not answering the question. Why is it good to murder 10 Billion living beings every year?
Presumably because people eat them.

Is there an objectively good reason for doing it? Not one that I can think of.

But then we should all probably live off of some kind of fungal food grown in vats or something. On the moon, or in orbit, for good measure, maybe.

User avatar
RyanThunder
Knows Best
Posts: 725
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:18 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1752 Post by RyanThunder »

Okay I should've done this a page ago, but what, precisely, are you proposing we do?

Losonti Tokash
Posts: 1456
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1753 Post by Losonti Tokash »

It's really not that difficult IF you can afford it. Fact is that veganism is generally a way more expensive diet than an omnivorous one.

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1754 Post by Zod »

So could someone explain how veganism is somehow more sustainable than our current methods? Can it realistically replace our existing food supply and still manage to provide enough nutrition for six billion people? Or is it just philosophical grand-standing as opposed to a practical solution?
Image

User avatar
adr
Moon Prism Power, Make Up!
Posts: 1462
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1755 Post by adr »

Have you ever seen one of those producer/consumer pyramids in a 3rd grade biology book?
In the name of the moon, I will punish you!

Losonti Tokash
Posts: 1456
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1756 Post by Losonti Tokash »

Zod wrote:So could someone explain how veganism is somehow more sustainable than our current methods? Can it realistically replace our existing food supply and still manage to provide enough nutrition for six billion people? Or is it just philosophical grand-standing as opposed to a practical solution?
Do you have any idea how much more energy goes into meat production than agriculture (meant for human consumption)?

User avatar
RyanThunder
Knows Best
Posts: 725
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:18 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1757 Post by RyanThunder »

Bah, forget vegetarianism. Let's all just get regular injections of raw, lab-manufactured nutrients and forgo eating altogether. Much more efficient. :D

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1758 Post by Zod »

Losonti Tokash wrote:
Zod wrote:So could someone explain how veganism is somehow more sustainable than our current methods? Can it realistically replace our existing food supply and still manage to provide enough nutrition for six billion people? Or is it just philosophical grand-standing as opposed to a practical solution?
Do you have any idea how much more energy goes into meat production than agriculture (meant for human consumption)?
Are you including the amount of energy it takes to combat topsoil erosion and degradation? (The answer is that neither one is really sustainable on its own if the population keeps growing.)
Image

User avatar
RyanThunder
Knows Best
Posts: 725
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:18 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1759 Post by RyanThunder »

Well, he does have a point; that producing a pound of beef takes a lot more resources than producing a pound of bread.

But yeah, pop control is critical. This would just be mitigating the side effects of that.

Infinity Biscuit
Battering Ram of Love
Posts: 928
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:36 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1760 Post by Infinity Biscuit »

Zod wrote:Are you including the amount of energy it takes to combat topsoil erosion and degradation? (The answer is that neither one is really sustainable on its own if the population keeps growing.)
You do realise that livestock don't just take energy from power plants or something, right? All that energy comes from vegetation, and every pound of vegetable you give to an animal is a fraction of a pound of usable food we get from it. Any resource issue crops have, animal products have three to twelve times over.
Image

User avatar
uraniun235
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:54 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1761 Post by uraniun235 »

I'm curious about one thing, though: let's say for a moment that one day we were to unanimously commit to no longer eating any meat products at all, ever again. The resources going into the mass production and distribution of meat are immediately freed up for the production of vegetarian food. This is going to produce a tremendous spike in the total supply of food, and in turn prices will crash; this theoretically enables poor people to better afford food and not have to starve.

But what happens then? Will all food producers accept this price level as the new normal? (Which leads to another question, how does this affect the standard of living for any agribusiness that isn't already a huge corporation?) Will some/a lot of them go out of business until prices return to where they previously were?

Would hunger actually be reduced in the long term by this action? Or would our economic system continue to deny people that which we have in abundance?
Last edited by uraniun235 on Sun Dec 16, 2012 5:59 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
uraniun235
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:54 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1762 Post by uraniun235 »

Infinity Biscuit wrote:
Zod wrote:Are you including the amount of energy it takes to combat topsoil erosion and degradation? (The answer is that neither one is really sustainable on its own if the population keeps growing.)
You do realise that livestock don't just take energy from power plants or something, right? All that energy comes from vegetation, and every pound of vegetable you give to an animal is a fraction of a pound of usable food we get from it. Any resource issue crops have, animal products have three to twelve times over.
It's not quite as binary as that. Yes, we pour a lot of human-consumable resources into the raising of livestock, but that doesn't mean that all meat products have to be derived from that. For example, keeping chickens in concert with a backyard garden can be substantially beneficial and provide a plentiful source of protein (eggs) and fertilizer, while helping with pest control and being damn cheap to keep fed. Cattle can graze on grasses which really don't do a whole lot for humans and which grow fairly readily with little labor and even on land which would not necessarily support other agriculture (at least not without substantial influx of resources).

The tremendous amount of resources that goes into meat is less an argument against any meat consumption whatsoever, and more against the sheer quantity of meat we gluttonously ingest as a society.

Infinity Biscuit
Battering Ram of Love
Posts: 928
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:36 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1763 Post by Infinity Biscuit »

The use of livestock in marginal lands, not being fed grain or straw from cropland does mean you're not using land resources you could otherwise, right, but you're still using more water, contributing more to erosion, and other things like that than if you didn't use that land at all. I think at that point it could be debatable as no longer quite so lopsided since if you go that far the effects are fairly minimal, but Zod was apparently thinking it could actually be better in those regards to raise meat, and not even necessarily restricting it to marginal areas.

On a personal level I have little objection to humanely-raised animals on marginal lands (or chickens in areas they can feed themselves), since my primary issue with meat is ecological. But I feel it's better to come at the issue from the assumption that the meat will cost more resources, and maybe find some exceptions, than to assume they're on equal ground.
Image

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1764 Post by Zod »

Infinity Biscuit wrote:The use of livestock in marginal lands, not being fed grain or straw from cropland does mean you're not using land resources you could otherwise, right, but you're still using more water, contributing more to erosion, and other things like that than if you didn't use that land at all. I think at that point it could be debatable as no longer quite so lopsided since if you go that far the effects are fairly minimal, but Zod was apparently thinking it could actually be better in those regards to raise meat, and not even necessarily restricting it to marginal areas.
Point out where I said so, otherwise fuck off about what I was "thinking".
Image

Infinity Biscuit
Battering Ram of Love
Posts: 928
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:36 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1765 Post by Infinity Biscuit »

You asked if meat was still more resource-intensive even including stuff like erosion? If you already figured that it was, that seems a weird thing to ask. Note the use of "could be" rather than "is" :P
Image

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1766 Post by Zod »

Infinity Biscuit wrote:You asked if meat was still more resource-intensive even including stuff like erosion? If you already figured that it was, that seems a weird thing to ask. Note the use of "could be" rather than "is" :P
No, I didn't. Good fucking Christ are you illiterate? It's right up there less than a page back.
Image

User avatar
Oxymoron
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1767 Post by Oxymoron »

Geez, Zod, don't you think you're over-reacting a little ?
No.

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1768 Post by Zod »

Oxymoron wrote:Geez, Zod, don't you think you're over-reacting a little ?
Not really, since it seems that some people like to find whatever excuse they can get to ride my ass for whatever reason.
Image

User avatar
RogueIce
#YOLO
Posts: 2089
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:57 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1769 Post by RogueIce »

Zod wrote:Not really, since it seems that some people like to find whatever excuse they can get to ride my ass for whatever reason.
Where's Ein when you need him? :v

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1770 Post by Zod »

RogueIce wrote:
Zod wrote:Not really, since it seems that some people like to find whatever excuse they can get to ride my ass for whatever reason.
Where's Ein when you need him? :v
Doesn't count. :P
Image

Losonti Tokash
Posts: 1456
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1771 Post by Losonti Tokash »

Zod, I think you need to chill out.

User avatar
adr
Moon Prism Power, Make Up!
Posts: 1462
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1772 Post by adr »

i just saw this on the facebook and it was an interesting read

http://fozmeadows.wordpress.com/2012/12 ... political/

about women and people of color in history and in fantasy
In the name of the moon, I will punish you!

Aaron
El Duderino
Posts: 2833
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:07 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1773 Post by Aaron »

You know, I feel like Mass Effect had the perfect opportunity to portray a multi-national future and fell short. It was good that i could be whatever colour I wanted but the VA was obviously North American. It would have been interesting to have your character be from Zimbabwe or something and explore how that effects her life. Does racism still exist, is Zimbabwe a full partner in the SA or are they ostracised like today?

Dooey Jo
Posts: 568
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:35 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1774 Post by Dooey Jo »

there is currently an amazing debacle ongoing in the land of sweden

see we have this tradition where every christmas eve at 3 p.m. whole families are forced at gunpoint by parents to watch a hour of old disney cartoons, some from the '30s

and this year disney decided to remove some good ol' fashioned racist caricatures which sometimes accidentally appeared in cartoons from the '30s
(it should be noted that said caricatures were not present until sometime in the '80s when they did some sort of restoration of the clips, because jesus christ the '30s were not something to be proud of)

naturally this is FUCKING OUTRAGEOUS :duchess: :duchess: :duchess:

because apparently we swedes are so post-racism that it's totally fine to show huge-nosed cartoons jews wobbling about, and black-faced dolls saying "mammy", as family entertainment.
i mean, it's not like we have a growing, explicitly racist party in parliament or anything, or that non-whites are almost openly discriminated against, or have a city becoming world-famous for its anti-semitism

clearly getting rid of racist stereotypes in family entertainment is the bad decision here :fukyu:

i almost wish disney would have released an additional statement with the removal: "you crazy fucks are already too fucking racist to handle this shit, what the hell is wrong with you?"
DracuLax - when even Death can't scare the shit out of you

thejester
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:24 am

Re: The Return of Testing Chat Thread

#1775 Post by thejester »

Haha you can't seriously be objecting to that. Maybe ban Tintin in the Congo while you're at it?

Locked