Trek Thread

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Zablorg
Baron of the Burrito
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 2:06 am

Re: Trek Thread

#676 Post by Zablorg »


http://youtube.com/watch?v=edflm7Hh3hs

poor worf
Top
User avatar
RogueIce
#YOLO
Posts: 2089
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:57 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#677 Post by RogueIce »

Those Cadet uniforms were pretty snappy. Granted it's the same color scheme DS9 ended up using, but the TNG collars were better than the turtleneck shirts. Especially when the shirts seemed to be purple for some reason.
Top
User avatar
adr
Moon Prism Power, Make Up!
Posts: 1462
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:59 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#678 Post by adr »

Michael dorn does a really good mr worf impression
In the name of the moon, I will punish you!
Top
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#679 Post by Darth Tedious »

Hey is this the for-real-actual poster and whatnot?

Image
adr rox worship him or suffer large
and so forth, etc.
also STAR TREK
Top
User avatar
Bounty
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#680 Post by Bounty »

Looks legit.
The preview screening had a scene with the Enterprise hiding under water.
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.
Top
User avatar
Sandman
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:21 pm
Location: The Dreaming

Re: Trek Thread

#681 Post by Sandman »

Basically, this is what happens when Captain Kirk gets very drunk and decides to take the Horatio Hornblower comparison a wee bit too seriously.
Top
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#682 Post by Darth Tedious »

Star Trek: Into Darkness the sea
wtf? Hiding in water? Really? Crazy
adr rox worship him or suffer large
and so forth, etc.
also STAR TREK
Top
User avatar
Sandman
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:21 pm
Location: The Dreaming

Re: Trek Thread

#683 Post by Sandman »

The trailer actually seemed to show the Enterprise crashing into the ocean, so I don't think it's 'hiding', exactly...

Edited to hide spoilers on request. Highlight above to reveal.
Last edited by Sandman on Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#684 Post by Darth Tedious »

argh, spoiler tags!
Don't want to give away what was in the trailer lol
adr rox worship him or suffer large
and so forth, etc.
also STAR TREK
Top
User avatar
Sandman
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:21 pm
Location: The Dreaming

Re: Trek Thread

#685 Post by Sandman »

Darth Tedious wrote:argh, spoiler tags!
Don't want to give away what was in the trailer lol
Fixed anyway, just in case someone complains seriously about it.
Top
Dr Roberts
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:06 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#686 Post by Dr Roberts »

So the new movie has Cumberbatch confirmed as Gary Mitchell right because despite all the evidence I have a friend who claims he is Khan citing a vid where Quinto called Benedict Khan by mistake.
Just having fun.
Top
User avatar
Instant Sunrise
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:49 am
Location: Orange County

Re: Trek Thread

#687 Post by Instant Sunrise »

well the enterprise was designed to fly in space, so it can withstand between 0 and 1 atmospheres.
Hi, I'm Liz!
Top
User avatar
Bounty
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#688 Post by Bounty »

Darth Tedious wrote:Star Trek: Into Darkness the sea
wtf? Hiding in water? Really? Crazy
Hiding from a primitive civilization. I hope it makes sense in context.
So the new movie has Cumberbatch confirmed as Gary Mitchell right because despite all the evidence I have a friend who claims he is Khan citing a vid where Quinto called Benedict Khan by mistake.
Officially he's still some new dude called Anderson or something. I'd say Mitchell's as good a guess as any, though I've heard a halfway convincing amusing theory that it's actually captain April and the movie's a remake of that TAS episode where aging runs sdrawkcab.

Also the Star Trek nerd in me is obliged to point out that the Intrepid-class starship was rated for submarine duty provided the engines were suitably waterproofed :techno:
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.
Top
Dr Roberts
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:06 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#689 Post by Dr Roberts »

Just read that the guy who plays Bones said He's Gary.
Just having fun.
Top
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#690 Post by Darth Tedious »

Bounty wrote:
Darth Tedious wrote:Star Trek: Into Darkness the sea
wtf? Hiding in water? Really? Crazy
Hiding from a primitive civilization. I hope it makes sense in context.
That makes even less sense!
Ah well, it's nuTrek, I don't expect it to make sense
Bounty wrote:Also the Star Trek nerd in me is obliged to point out that the Intrepid-class starship was rated for submarine duty provided the engines were suitably waterproofed :techno:
Did that fact only emerge after Fluidic Space was invented?
adr rox worship him or suffer large
and so forth, etc.
also STAR TREK
Top
User avatar
Stofsk
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#691 Post by Stofsk »

Darth Tedious wrote:
Bounty wrote:Also the Star Trek nerd in me is obliged to point out that the Intrepid-class starship was rated for submarine duty provided the engines were suitably waterproofed :techno:
Did that fact only emerge after Fluidic Space was invented?
I don't care what anyone says, 'Scorpion' was an epic two-parter and one of the best stories Voyager ever told. Fluidic space be damned.

i just felt like throwing that in there, carry on
Top
Dr Roberts
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:06 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#692 Post by Dr Roberts »

It was promising with realizing the laws of Physics would be different, then they ignored it completely.
Just having fun.
Top
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#693 Post by Darth Tedious »

Stofsk wrote:
Darth Tedious wrote:
Bounty wrote:Also the Star Trek nerd in me is obliged to point out that the Intrepid-class starship was rated for submarine duty provided the engines were suitably waterproofed :techno:
Did that fact only emerge after Fluidic Space was invented?
I don't care what anyone says, 'Scorpion' was an epic two-parter and one of the best stories Voyager ever told. Fluidic space be damned.

i just felt like throwing that in there, carry on
I'm going to not just let that slide

Scorpion was awesome and I totally agree
Fluidic space did not ruin it
adr rox worship him or suffer large
and so forth, etc.
also STAR TREK
Top
User avatar
Sandman
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:21 pm
Location: The Dreaming

Re: Trek Thread

#694 Post by Sandman »

Who the hell honestly complained that fluidic space of all things ruined Scorpion?
Top
Dr Roberts
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:06 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#695 Post by Dr Roberts »

I thought the concept behind Scorpion was pretty neat. The handling of it, not so much...
Just having fun.
Top
User avatar
timmy
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:56 am

Re: Trek Thread

#696 Post by timmy »

Image

Snar snar snar
"also it really shits my mum so it's a good way of winding her up"

-thejester
Top
Dr Roberts
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:06 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#697 Post by Dr Roberts »

That made me laugh more than I should have.
Just having fun.
Top
User avatar
uraniun235
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:54 am

Re: Trek Thread

#698 Post by uraniun235 »

Darth Tedious wrote:Did that fact only emerge after Fluidic Space was invented?
I think it came up in the one episode where they find the planetoid made completely out of water, and there's something deep in the waterball that they need, and supposedly Voyager could be made waterproof but it would take too long so let's use the Delta Flyer...


it's been years and years since I've seen that episode why in christ do I still remember that
Top
User avatar
Bounty
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: Trek Thread

#699 Post by Bounty »

Because it was one of the decent ones. Also, because we're nerds.
People in glass trousers shouldn't shit bricks.
Top
User avatar
timmy
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:56 am

Re: Trek Thread

#700 Post by timmy »

I don't see why, with SIF in play, a starship couldn't survive underwater

Not sure whether they use the standard propulsion systems or use tractor/repulsors to get around
"also it really shits my mum so it's a good way of winding her up"

-thejester
Top
Post Reply

Return to “New Testing”