Trek Thread

Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger.
Message
Author
User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Trek Thread

#51 Post by Veef »

man this movie is giving me a huge man-crush on Ricardo Montalban and his pecs

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Trek Thread

#52 Post by Veef »

Now I'm watching Star Trek 4

stop saying WESSELS :argh:

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Trek Thread

#53 Post by adr-admin »

star trek 4 is awesome and i'll hear no bad thing about it

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Trek Thread

#54 Post by Veef »

yeah i know it's great

man that time travel sequence was weird

did they really throw a mannequin into a pool

Dooey Jo
Posts: 568
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:35 am

Re: Trek Thread

#55 Post by Dooey Jo »

is that the one with the whales and shit?

it's awesome

the guy is all "fuck this chemotherapy shit i've got this" or something

and spock on the bus is all "i'll fuck this music guy up"
DracuLax - when even Death can't scare the shit out of you

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Trek Thread

#56 Post by adr-admin »

that was so real

people got FUCKED UP in that movie

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Trek Thread

#57 Post by Veef »

<3 Deforest Kelley

he was such a good guy

User avatar
Darth Tedious
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#58 Post by Darth Tedious »

ST4 proved that Trek can be at it's best when it isn't taking itself too seriously.

LOL wessels.

Spock did a little too much LDS back in the '60s.
adr rox worship him or suffer large
and so forth, etc.
also STAR TREK

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Trek Thread

#59 Post by Veef »

i'm watching nemesis

i think this whole movie can be summarized by the part where Patrick Stewart is grinning like a hillbilly in the Argo

User avatar
Veef
Posts: 2065
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:52 am

Re: Trek Thread

#60 Post by Veef »

also when picard and data escape the reman ship in the mini shuttle they totally burst through a huge glass window on the back of the ship

Image

User avatar
Nietzslime
Give these people air!
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:57 am

Re: Trek Thread

#61 Post by Nietzslime »

VF5SS wrote:i'm watching nemesis

i think this whole movie can be summarized by the part where Patrick Stewart is grinning like a hillbilly in the Argo
that's sounds like a much more entertaining movie than nemesis
Europe: Genocide-free since at least 1996.

User avatar
timmy
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:56 am

Re: Trek Thread

#62 Post by timmy »

I know I'm late to this party but my mother had reservations about me watching TMNT initially(she caved under the inertia of it at the time(1991), thank god.

By way of contrast my seven year old daughter is counting down until 9th November so we can play through Modern Warfare 3 together. I feel slightly guilty about this; but she has extended family members in the armed forces and I explain as we go that this is what some people in the army do(with the addendum that most of what happens in the military is Hurry-Up-And-Wait etc)

Am I robbing her of innocence?

And are we going to talk Trek?
"also it really shits my mum so it's a good way of winding her up"

-thejester

Aaron
El Duderino
Posts: 2833
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:07 am

Re: Trek Thread

#63 Post by Aaron »

Dude, my 10 year old is playing Gears with me right now. Just emphasize that most of what we do is not what's in games.

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Trek Thread

#64 Post by Zod »

timmy wrote:I know I'm late to this party but my mother had reservations about me watching TMNT initially(she caved under the inertia of it at the time(1991), thank god.

By way of contrast my seven year old daughter is counting down until 9th November so we can play through Modern Warfare 3 together. I feel slightly guilty about this; but she has extended family members in the armed forces and I explain as we go that this is what some people in the army do(with the addendum that most of what happens in the military is Hurry-Up-And-Wait etc)

Am I robbing her of innocence?

And are we going to talk Trek?
Nobody should make their children play shitty games. I mean MW3? Ew.
Image

User avatar
Stofsk
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#65 Post by Stofsk »

yeah shit timmy

you should get bf3 and bring your daughter into the mix

User avatar
timmy
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:56 am

Re: Trek Thread

#66 Post by timmy »

I have a confession to make

She has sat next to me a few times when we've been playing BC2

Every time you use your usual epithets to describe the ethics of members of the opposing force she raises her eyebrows in silent scandal and mouths 'he said the naughtiest word!'
"also it really shits my mum so it's a good way of winding her up"

-thejester

User avatar
Stofsk
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#67 Post by Stofsk »

:o

:lol:

:oops:

shit timmy

why you have to go and make me feel guilty now

User avatar
timmy
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:56 am

Re: Trek Thread

#68 Post by timmy »

Haha yeah because she's never hear words like that before; I understand schoolchildren these days are upstanding citizens and above taboo material.
"also it really shits my mum so it's a good way of winding her up"

-thejester

User avatar
Stofsk
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:05 am

Re: Trek Thread

#69 Post by Stofsk »

well if i knew that the little lady was on the other end of the line i'd have maintained my composure y'dig

User avatar
timmy
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:56 am

Re: Trek Thread

#70 Post by timmy »

Well the deal was kind of 'if you're not going to go to bed then you can stay up for another half hour and watch me play BC2, but you're not allowed to talk above a stage whisper.'
"also it really shits my mum so it's a good way of winding her up"

-thejester

Aaron
El Duderino
Posts: 2833
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:07 am

Re: Trek Thread

#71 Post by Aaron »

Good thing your not playing with Dan, Zak, Brandon and I then. ;)

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Trek Thread

#72 Post by adr-admin »

So the Borg are Star Trek's commentary on democracy.

With all the individuals plugged into the collective, there is no leader, there are no representatives. All decisions are made by collective - direct democracy as perfect as it can be.

Yet the drones, with all this individual power making up the collective, were still totally subservient to the state - the tyranny of the majority.

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Trek Thread

#73 Post by Zod »

adr wrote:So the Borg are Star Trek's commentary on democracy.

With all the individuals plugged into the collective, there is no leader, there are no representatives. All decisions are made by collective - direct democracy as perfect as it can be.

Yet the drones, with all this individual power making up the collective, were still totally subservient to the state - the tyranny of the majority.
except for the whole queen thing
Image

adr-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1824
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Trek Thread

#74 Post by adr-admin »

OK, so the queen. The queen isn't literally an individual leading the Borg. She's a metaphor, a personification of the collective.

People find that strange because sometimes she gives verbal orders to the drones, contradicting their action. If they are the collective and so is she, shouldn't they already agree?

Maybe not.

See, for every decision made, somebody isn't going to like it. There might be a majority, but probably a different majority for each decision, and in the perfect direct democracy of the collective, every decision is made this way.

Thus, every person in it is oppressed to the will of the others - hence, drones - and drones who the majority of the time actually won't agree with what the Queen represents.

The majority of the collective didn't want to attack Data (or whatever that scene was), because it didn't affect them personally, see individual actors in a democracy are often fairly selfish, and we hope this balances out to the good of the whole. The drones in Engineering wanted to attack - it affected them - so they were going to... until the majority opinion, represented through the queen - shut them down.


Normally, the Borg would sort this out instantly, but the movie wanted the viewer to actually see the disagreement, so Frakes slowed it down and personified it to make a point.


The thing is, where you get the power isn't the problem... it's the power itself. Democracy doesn't magically mean freedom - tyranny is not only possible, but just as likely even with a perfect implementation like the Borg have. The will of the majority of individuals don't necessarily add up to what individuals really want.

(the Borg metaphor is also seen against capitalism and the free market. The free market is the same kind of thing, a democracy with deep flaws.)

User avatar
Zod
perkele
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:04 am

Re: Trek Thread

#75 Post by Zod »

eh, i always thought the borg were supposed to be a metaphor about communism
Image

Post Reply