New Testingstan

starku wrote:What the fuck are you talking about did you refuse to join the br party and now can't use them

Cause if you have rejected a media format because fat lamers use it, that's pretty fat and lame

I haven't had a reason to upgrade. My eyes aren't good enough to see a picture improvement, and I have yet to see any extra features worth using.

I know that in time I'll see a feature worth getting, but until then I'm cool with DVD.

Gands wrote:

starku wrote:What the fuck are you talking about did you refuse to join the br party and now can't use them

Cause if you have rejected a media format because fat lamers use it, that's pretty fat and lame

I haven't had a reason to upgrade. My eyes aren't good enough to see a picture improvement, and I have yet to see any extra features worth using.

I know that in time I'll see a feature worth getting, but until then I'm cool with DVD.

What size/type TV do you have?

a lot of blurays come with the bluray version, dvd version and digital download all in one standard box

it's win/win as far as i see it

Flagg wrote:What size/type TV do you have?

I'm pretty sure it's this one.

http://www.samsung.com/au/consumer/tv-a ... D550K7MXXY

Yeah, you will notice a difference, but not a huge one with that TV. Mine is too big for DVD's.

I figure I'll notice when I eventually get a bigger television, but I'm not there so I don't care.

at least with my camera shit i'm not singing obnoxiously off-key

and by camera shit i mean my e-pl1, two lenses and a cheapo tripod

i can't imagine most nerds would go for an e-pl1

I can't imagine why you're trying to justify yourself to stark :/

Gands wrote:I haven't had a reason to upgrade. My eyes aren't good enough to see a picture improvement, and I have yet to see any extra features worth using.

I know that in time I'll see a feature worth getting, but until then I'm cool with DVD.

The difference can be seen on a 13" laptop. That 480p image on a 1280x720 screen is going to look worse than the 720p image if the studio didn't fuck up the transfer.

Edit: If you can't tell the difference between DVD and Blu-ray here, I guess it's best you don't upgrade in the future.

starku wrote:Gotta make 'owning a movie' a 'hobbby' by making it more exclusive and expensive, because everyone wants to feel super unique and pro

Otherwise how will anyone KNOW??

I get them when they're cheap. I got BB and TDK for $4.99/piece after giving the store two DVDs. Also note that the only available Blu-ray of Scarface when it was originally released was a steelbook and I got it by trading in two BDs. I could have pirated it, sure, but I didn't want to. But I'm a fatty nerd.

Edit: Owning a movie is not a hobby. The hobby is watching films and analyzing them for entertainment. Writing about them too, which I love.

Oxymoron wrote:Well, I know I sometimes like to pick up collectors editions of things, or shit like that

but it's not because of "what will other people think of me" bullshit, but because I'm a fan of the work and would like "more" than just the movie/game/book/disc/whatever.

like, "expanding" the experience, you see ?

Yes. I happen to like the look of steelbooks more. But they are expensive, so I get them when they're cheaper or the same price as the amaray releases (blue cases), as was the case with BB and TDK. The only reason I'm considering the TDKR steelbook if it gets one is for consistency.

Does TDK on BR have a commentary track?

Gands wrote:Does TDK on BR have a commentary track?

No. Nolan doesn't do them.

I figured as much.

Are there any good BR only special features out there yet?

Gands wrote:I figured as much.

Are there any good BR only special features out there yet?

I take that back. He did one for Memento and Insomnia.

Yes. Maximum Movie Mode is very cool. A host interrupts the movie to talk about the production.

Picture in Picture is also cool. Little video overlays pop up while you watch the movie to show various behind the scenes.

Criterion is seen as the best studio for bonus features, but their shit routinely costs $30+ (the 2-3 disc sets are more than some TV sets), so I only buy what I know I'll watch again.

isn't the whole nerd thing largely created by marketers?
I mean, there's socially awkward people obsessing over a subject, but turning it into a 'culture'

starku wrote:The very term collectors edition is chain around the neck of nerds

It's an insight into how marketers know nerds think

It depends. If a collector's edition has a shitload of bonus features and new content that are up my alley (like the LotR Extended sets) I'll trade my other copy and get those. But shit like "buy this to get this photo book and trading cards", I pass. It';s like those Potter fans that buy the ultimate editions for terrible documentaries, a photo book, and trading cards. they keep getting suckered. The Wizards set is out soon and it's going to cost at least $250 and it has all of the same shit with very little new.

Edit: The problem with Blu-ray is that you must research prior to buying. You don't want to get saddled with the Universal catalogue butchering (The Big Lebowski, The Mummy, The Mummy Returns, Jurassic park, Back to the Future, etc).

so would it be better if it was like "special edition" or something but not collector

i am exhausted as hell so reading comprehension probably sucks

Losonti Tokash wrote:so would it be better if it was like "special edition" or something but not collector

i am exhausted as hell so reading comprehension probably sucks

Who the fuck knows. This thread has turned into LOL AT CRIPPLE TUCKER FOR LIKING THE LOOK OF X AND Y AND MOVIES != HOBBY.

Collector's Edition is a buzzword anyway. I don't give a shit about resell value. However, I could easily sell my Zodiac Blu-ray for 5x what I paid for it because it's out of print.

evilsoup wrote:isn't the whole nerd thing largely created by marketers?
I mean, there's socially awkward people obsessing over a subject, but turning it into a 'culture'

I don't think that the term was originated by marketers, but now it's all marketing.

I'd be fascinated to know when marketing took control of it.

I'm not sure I get Stark's point here.

You want to know how far people take Blu-ray collecting? Many refuse to buy a release they want if there's no slipcover. Some routinely return items to Amazon if there's a damaged slipcover. When I bought Pulp fiction, I tore it up and used it as an avatar to troll those people.

of course the term isn't originally a marketing one, but the whole nerd culture is largely built on marketing for video games &etc.
Well, largely
some of it probably is legitimately home-grown
IDK

what's a slipcover?

evilsoup wrote:what's a slipcover?

A bit of cardboard that goes over the case. http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn2/ ... s1Slip.jpg