so he's been peeing on the toilet
and i axed him if he gottas poop there too
he says no
i say try anyway
he sits there for a bit but insists no need
so i let him up
he goes to the kitchen
and promptly poops his pants
my god
39 on sundayAaron wrote:Are coffee and I seriously the oldest ones here?
I was born in late 1986! I'm also 25!adr wrote:i'm 25
born in late 1986
but i'm so set in my ways already that i prolly come across as some cranky geezer!
It's the Stephen Conroy approach.Zod wrote:Welcome to America, Canuckians.
ftfyQuestor wrote:Don't they know thatthe InternetEntertainment Media is a HUMAN RIGHT!!!!!!1!11!!
Thank fuck, I'm not the oldest guy here then.Darth Nostril wrote:39 on sundayAaron wrote:Are coffee and I seriously the oldest ones here?
y u so hurtfulstarku wrote:It's more 'I'M A JUGGALO WOOP WOOP' or 'amazingly narrowminded' than old actuslly
I was thinking more like "Gee this would never be abused by unscrupulous officials looking for personal gain to intimidate opponents."weemadando wrote:It's the Stephen Conroy approach.Zod wrote:Welcome to America, Canuckians.
"We need to block the internet and filter everything that people do?"
"But why? Don't you realise the limitations of the technology and the infrastructure costs involved?"
"PAEDOPHILE! YOU JUST WANT YOUR CHILD PORN!"
Completely unsurprisingly such events have occurred even with Australia's current Internet blacklist.Zod wrote:
I was thinking more like "Gee this would never be abused by unscrupulous officials looking for personal gain to intimidate opponents."
A little of column A a little of column B. Anything to break up the fucking bandwagoning one sided circle jerks that turned the place into a festering pile of shit with small snippets of interesting scattered about.Crazedwraith wrote:This facebook thread is hilarious. "shooting things is not a violent action" Classic.
I find it hard to tell sometimes Fanboy, adr, whether you're arguing against these things because you actually believe it's not true or just because SDN people said it.
how dare you insinuate that there's any trolls on the internetCrazedwraith wrote:I find it hard to tell sometimes Fanboy, adr, whether you're arguing against these things because you actually believe it's not true or just because SDN people said it.
Me too!!Darth Fanboy wrote:A little of column A a little of column B.
And you don't think there's going to be a difference in the impact to the kid between 'take away the laptop' and 'violently blast the laptop to shit'? Yes, the end result, not having a laptop is the same but it doesn't mean the impact of the kid is the same in both cases.Darth Fanboy wrote:And no I don't think that shooting the laptop was violent towards the girl, violent towards the laptop? Well I guess but its not like you can intimidate something that...isn't alive.
Whitney Houston for example.
im sorry i dont know what came over meadr wrote:
how dare you insinuate that there's any trolls on the internet